胚胎着床前无细胞DNA无创染色体筛查

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jin Huang, Ya-xin Yao, Yan Zhou, Jialin Jia, Jing Wang, Jun Ren, Ping Liu, Sijia Lu
{"title":"胚胎着床前无细胞DNA无创染色体筛查","authors":"Jin Huang, Ya-xin Yao, Yan Zhou, Jialin Jia, Jing Wang, Jun Ren, Ping Liu, Sijia Lu","doi":"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a widely adopted screening method that can be performed to identify and select embryos with normal ploidy; however, PGT relies on embryo biopsy, that is, polar body, embryo cells, or trophectoderm biopsy, to obtain embryonic DNA, increase its technical limitations. Studies have indicated that biopsy may have an influence on the quality and development of embryos, and increase the chance of abnormal epigenetic modifications. Therefore, non-invasive PGT (niPGT) detection of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has gradually become a hot research topic in the field of assisted reproduction. Studies showed cfDNA could be detected in blastocyst fluid and spent culture medium (SCM) in vitro cultured embryos. The cfDNA collection requires less skill and makes lower risk to embryos. Some studies have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility of SCM-based niPGT approaches. When comparing the ploidy consistency of cfDNA in SCM, its consistency to the conventional PGT for aneuploidies results fluctuated widely, it is critical to recognize the factors influencing accuracy. These contradictory results may be related to factors such as the difference in SCM sampling methods and sampling time, and the definition of consistency. In this review, we aimed to comprehensively summarize how researchers use embryonic cfDNA to conduct niPGT detection. It also systematically reviews the factors affecting the accuracy of the test and its underlying issues, as well as prospective applications. We hope to provide a basis for future niPGT research and a useful reference for the standardized operation of niPGT that can be widely applied in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":20959,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"113 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive chromosome screening for embryo preimplantation using cell-free DNA\",\"authors\":\"Jin Huang, Ya-xin Yao, Yan Zhou, Jialin Jia, Jing Wang, Jun Ren, Ping Liu, Sijia Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a widely adopted screening method that can be performed to identify and select embryos with normal ploidy; however, PGT relies on embryo biopsy, that is, polar body, embryo cells, or trophectoderm biopsy, to obtain embryonic DNA, increase its technical limitations. Studies have indicated that biopsy may have an influence on the quality and development of embryos, and increase the chance of abnormal epigenetic modifications. Therefore, non-invasive PGT (niPGT) detection of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has gradually become a hot research topic in the field of assisted reproduction. Studies showed cfDNA could be detected in blastocyst fluid and spent culture medium (SCM) in vitro cultured embryos. The cfDNA collection requires less skill and makes lower risk to embryos. Some studies have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility of SCM-based niPGT approaches. When comparing the ploidy consistency of cfDNA in SCM, its consistency to the conventional PGT for aneuploidies results fluctuated widely, it is critical to recognize the factors influencing accuracy. These contradictory results may be related to factors such as the difference in SCM sampling methods and sampling time, and the definition of consistency. In this review, we aimed to comprehensively summarize how researchers use embryonic cfDNA to conduct niPGT detection. It also systematically reviews the factors affecting the accuracy of the test and its underlying issues, as well as prospective applications. We hope to provide a basis for future niPGT research and a useful reference for the standardized operation of niPGT that can be widely applied in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

植入前基因检测(PGT)是一种广泛采用的筛选方法,可用于鉴定和选择具有正常倍性的胚胎;然而,PGT依赖于胚胎活检,即极体、胚胎细胞或滋养外胚层活检来获取胚胎DNA,增加了其技术局限性。研究表明,活组织检查可能会影响胚胎的质量和发育,并增加异常表观遗传修饰的机会。因此,无创PGT (niPGT)检测游离DNA (cfDNA)逐渐成为辅助生殖领域的研究热点。研究表明,cfDNA可在体外培养的胚泡液和废培养基(SCM)中检测到。cfDNA采集需要的技能较少,对胚胎的风险也较低。已经进行了一些研究来评估基于scm的niPGT方法的可行性。在比较SCM中cfDNA的倍性一致性时,其与常规PGT非整倍性结果的一致性波动较大,认识到影响准确性的因素是至关重要的。这些矛盾的结果可能与SCM采样方法和采样时间的差异以及一致性的定义等因素有关。在这篇综述中,我们旨在全面总结研究人员如何利用胚胎cfDNA进行niPGT检测。它还系统地回顾了影响测试准确性的因素及其潜在问题,以及未来的应用。希望为今后niPGT的研究提供依据,并为niPGT的规范化操作提供有益的参考,以便在临床中得到广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-invasive chromosome screening for embryo preimplantation using cell-free DNA
Abstract Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a widely adopted screening method that can be performed to identify and select embryos with normal ploidy; however, PGT relies on embryo biopsy, that is, polar body, embryo cells, or trophectoderm biopsy, to obtain embryonic DNA, increase its technical limitations. Studies have indicated that biopsy may have an influence on the quality and development of embryos, and increase the chance of abnormal epigenetic modifications. Therefore, non-invasive PGT (niPGT) detection of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has gradually become a hot research topic in the field of assisted reproduction. Studies showed cfDNA could be detected in blastocyst fluid and spent culture medium (SCM) in vitro cultured embryos. The cfDNA collection requires less skill and makes lower risk to embryos. Some studies have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility of SCM-based niPGT approaches. When comparing the ploidy consistency of cfDNA in SCM, its consistency to the conventional PGT for aneuploidies results fluctuated widely, it is critical to recognize the factors influencing accuracy. These contradictory results may be related to factors such as the difference in SCM sampling methods and sampling time, and the definition of consistency. In this review, we aimed to comprehensively summarize how researchers use embryonic cfDNA to conduct niPGT detection. It also systematically reviews the factors affecting the accuracy of the test and its underlying issues, as well as prospective applications. We hope to provide a basis for future niPGT research and a useful reference for the standardized operation of niPGT that can be widely applied in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
384
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信