认知考试重要性和考生情绪对低风险考试中花费努力的影响:一个纵向面板模型

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Finney, Paulius Satkus, B. Perkins
{"title":"认知考试重要性和考生情绪对低风险考试中花费努力的影响:一个纵向面板模型","authors":"S. Finney, Paulius Satkus, B. Perkins","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Test-taking effort relates to performance on low-stakes tests; thus, researchers and assessment practitioners have investigated what influences students to put forth effort when completing these tests. Using a longitudinal design, we evaluated the often-cited effect of perceived test importance on test-taking effort. More specifically, a 29-item low-stakes institutional accountability test was split into three subtests. College students completed measures of perceived test importance and test-taking effort after each subtest, in addition to measures of test emotions (anger, pride). Emotions were assessed and modeled to provide a rigorous test of the unique relation between perceived test importance and effort. Using a panel model with autoregressive effects, we found perceived test importance had no significant direct or indirect effects on effort during the test. Emotions, however, were predictive of subsequent effort. These results can inform interventions to increase test-taking effort by calling attention to variables other than perceived test importance.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"159 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Perceived Test Importance and Examinee Emotions on Expended Effort during A Low-Stakes Test: A Longitudinal Panel Model\",\"authors\":\"S. Finney, Paulius Satkus, B. Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Test-taking effort relates to performance on low-stakes tests; thus, researchers and assessment practitioners have investigated what influences students to put forth effort when completing these tests. Using a longitudinal design, we evaluated the often-cited effect of perceived test importance on test-taking effort. More specifically, a 29-item low-stakes institutional accountability test was split into three subtests. College students completed measures of perceived test importance and test-taking effort after each subtest, in addition to measures of test emotions (anger, pride). Emotions were assessed and modeled to provide a rigorous test of the unique relation between perceived test importance and effort. Using a panel model with autoregressive effects, we found perceived test importance had no significant direct or indirect effects on effort during the test. Emotions, however, were predictive of subsequent effort. These results can inform interventions to increase test-taking effort by calling attention to variables other than perceived test importance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1756254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

参加考试的努力与低风险考试的表现有关;因此,研究人员和评估从业者调查了是什么影响学生在完成这些测试时付出努力。使用纵向设计,我们评估了经常被引用的感知考试重要性对考试努力的影响。更具体地说,一个29项的低风险机构问责测试被分成三个子测试。除了测试情绪(愤怒、骄傲)外,大学生们还在每个子测试后完成了感知考试重要性和考试努力程度的测试。情绪被评估和建模,以提供感知测试重要性和努力之间的独特关系的严格测试。使用具有自回归效应的面板模型,我们发现感知测试重要性对测试期间的努力没有显著的直接或间接影响。然而,情绪可以预测随后的努力。这些结果可以告知干预措施,通过引起对变量的注意而不是感知到的测试重要性来增加考试的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Perceived Test Importance and Examinee Emotions on Expended Effort during A Low-Stakes Test: A Longitudinal Panel Model
ABSTRACT Test-taking effort relates to performance on low-stakes tests; thus, researchers and assessment practitioners have investigated what influences students to put forth effort when completing these tests. Using a longitudinal design, we evaluated the often-cited effect of perceived test importance on test-taking effort. More specifically, a 29-item low-stakes institutional accountability test was split into three subtests. College students completed measures of perceived test importance and test-taking effort after each subtest, in addition to measures of test emotions (anger, pride). Emotions were assessed and modeled to provide a rigorous test of the unique relation between perceived test importance and effort. Using a panel model with autoregressive effects, we found perceived test importance had no significant direct or indirect effects on effort during the test. Emotions, however, were predictive of subsequent effort. These results can inform interventions to increase test-taking effort by calling attention to variables other than perceived test importance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信