评价自身免疫性疾病在血液门诊白细胞减少/中性粒细胞减少情况下的临床应用

Devin Malik, P. Kuriakose, J. Philip, A. Hejab, A. Horbal, V. Mendiratta
{"title":"评价自身免疫性疾病在血液门诊白细胞减少/中性粒细胞减少情况下的临床应用","authors":"Devin Malik, P. Kuriakose, J. Philip, A. Hejab, A. Horbal, V. Mendiratta","doi":"10.1182/BLOOD.V130.SUPPL_1.1000.1000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Leukopenia (WBC count of Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we searched for outpatient hematology consults with a diagnosis of leukopenia and/or neutropenia using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes between 2005-2015 at Henry Ford Hospital. Data points included demographics and antibody serology. Patients were excluded if they had a known hematologic disorder, known rheumatologic disorder or were on active chemotherapy. A positive ANA or RF were considered if titers were >1:80 or RF >14 IU/mL, respectively as these are institutional cutoffs. Complete blood counts were reviewed for patients who were not excluded based on above criteria. Hematology and rheumatology notes were reviewed looking for symptoms suggestive of autoimmune conditions or if an alternative diagnosis was made. Results: A total of 561 patients were seen in our outpatient clinic during the 10 year interval with an associated diagnostic code for leukopenia/neutropenia.199 were excluded due to incomplete data or inadequate follow up period, 35 patients for known malignancy, 14 for known rheumatologic disorder, and 122 for being on active chemotherapy. The remaining 191 patients were reviewed for data analysis. Patient demographics are summarized in table 1. A total of 116 patients (61%) were tested for ANA, of which 27 (23%) were positive. 22 of those 27 (81%) patients were referred to rheumatology, 6 of which were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases (22%). RF was tested in 110 patients (58%), of which 15 were positive (14%) all were referred to rheumatology, and 5(42%) were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases. Test results, referral rate and rheumatologic diagnosis are listed in table 2. The majority of patients who were diagnosed with rheumatologic disorders had associated findings suggestive of underlying disease (3 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had mild thrombocytopenia (100-150K/uL), 1 patient with mixed connective tissue disease had Raynaud9s phenomenon, 3 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had arthralgias and 1 had myalgias, all with correlating physical exam or radiographic findings). Other alternative diagnoses for leukopenia/neutropenia included drug induced, viral and bacterial infections, hematologic malignancies, ethnic neutropenia, transient leukopenia, and idiopathic. Conclusion: Ambulatory hematology consults for leukopenia/neutropenia are a common occurrence in practice. Our study showed that 11 patients out of 191 (6%) were found to have an associated rheumatologic disorder, with the majority having other signs/symptoms or associated lab abnormalities suggestive of autoimmune disease. This study shows that testing for ANA and RF in patients with leukopenia/neutropenia are of limited clinical utility in asymptomatic patients with no other lab abnormalities and it should not be part of a routine work up unless directed by symptoms. Primary care providers need to screen for other abnormalities (symptoms/clinical findings) in order to identify patients that would benefit most from subspecialty referral. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.","PeriodicalId":93074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of reviews and research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Testing for Autoimmune Disorders in the Setting of Leukopenia/Neutropenia in an Ambulatory Hematology Clinic\",\"authors\":\"Devin Malik, P. Kuriakose, J. Philip, A. Hejab, A. Horbal, V. Mendiratta\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/BLOOD.V130.SUPPL_1.1000.1000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Leukopenia (WBC count of Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we searched for outpatient hematology consults with a diagnosis of leukopenia and/or neutropenia using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes between 2005-2015 at Henry Ford Hospital. Data points included demographics and antibody serology. Patients were excluded if they had a known hematologic disorder, known rheumatologic disorder or were on active chemotherapy. A positive ANA or RF were considered if titers were >1:80 or RF >14 IU/mL, respectively as these are institutional cutoffs. Complete blood counts were reviewed for patients who were not excluded based on above criteria. Hematology and rheumatology notes were reviewed looking for symptoms suggestive of autoimmune conditions or if an alternative diagnosis was made. Results: A total of 561 patients were seen in our outpatient clinic during the 10 year interval with an associated diagnostic code for leukopenia/neutropenia.199 were excluded due to incomplete data or inadequate follow up period, 35 patients for known malignancy, 14 for known rheumatologic disorder, and 122 for being on active chemotherapy. The remaining 191 patients were reviewed for data analysis. Patient demographics are summarized in table 1. A total of 116 patients (61%) were tested for ANA, of which 27 (23%) were positive. 22 of those 27 (81%) patients were referred to rheumatology, 6 of which were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases (22%). RF was tested in 110 patients (58%), of which 15 were positive (14%) all were referred to rheumatology, and 5(42%) were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases. Test results, referral rate and rheumatologic diagnosis are listed in table 2. The majority of patients who were diagnosed with rheumatologic disorders had associated findings suggestive of underlying disease (3 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had mild thrombocytopenia (100-150K/uL), 1 patient with mixed connective tissue disease had Raynaud9s phenomenon, 3 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had arthralgias and 1 had myalgias, all with correlating physical exam or radiographic findings). Other alternative diagnoses for leukopenia/neutropenia included drug induced, viral and bacterial infections, hematologic malignancies, ethnic neutropenia, transient leukopenia, and idiopathic. Conclusion: Ambulatory hematology consults for leukopenia/neutropenia are a common occurrence in practice. Our study showed that 11 patients out of 191 (6%) were found to have an associated rheumatologic disorder, with the majority having other signs/symptoms or associated lab abnormalities suggestive of autoimmune disease. This study shows that testing for ANA and RF in patients with leukopenia/neutropenia are of limited clinical utility in asymptomatic patients with no other lab abnormalities and it should not be part of a routine work up unless directed by symptoms. Primary care providers need to screen for other abnormalities (symptoms/clinical findings) in order to identify patients that would benefit most from subspecialty referral. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of reviews and research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of reviews and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD.V130.SUPPL_1.1000.1000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of reviews and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD.V130.SUPPL_1.1000.1000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:白细胞减少症(WBC计数方法:在获得机构审查委员会的批准后,我们在2005年至2015年期间在亨利福特医院使用ICD-9和ICD-10诊断代码搜索诊断为白细胞减少症和/或中性粒细胞减少症的门诊血液学咨询。数据点包括人口统计学和抗体血清学sorder或正在接受积极化疗。如果滴度分别>1:80或RF>14 IU/mL,则认为ANA或RF呈阳性,因为这是机构临界值。根据上述标准,对未被排除在外的患者进行了全血细胞计数检查。回顾了血液学和风湿病的记录,寻找提示自身免疫性疾病的症状或是否做出了替代诊断。结果:在10年的时间间隔内,共有561名患者在我们的门诊就诊,其相关诊断代码为白细胞减少症/中性粒细胞减少症。由于数据不完整或随访期不足,199名患者被排除在外,35名患者为已知恶性肿瘤,14名为已知风湿病,122名患者正在接受积极化疗。对其余191名患者进行数据分析。患者人口统计汇总见表1。共有116名患者(61%)接受了ANA检测,其中27名(23%)呈阳性。27名患者中有22名(81%)转诊至风湿病,其中6名被诊断为风湿病(22%)。对110名患者(58%)进行了RF检测,其中15名(14%)呈阳性,全部转诊至风湿病,5名(42%)被诊断为风湿病。表2列出了检测结果、转诊率和风湿病诊断。大多数被诊断为风湿病的患者都有提示潜在疾病的相关发现(3名系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者有轻度血小板减少症(100-150K/uL),1名混合结缔组织疾病患者有雷诺现象,3名类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者有关节痛,1名肌痛,所有这些都具有相关的身体检查或射线照相结果)。白细胞减少症/中性粒细胞减少症的其他替代诊断包括药物诱导的、病毒和细菌感染、血液系统恶性肿瘤、少数民族中性粒细胞减症、短暂性白细胞减少和特发性。结论:白细胞减少/中性粒细胞减少的动态血液学咨询在实践中很常见。我们的研究表明,191名患者中有11名(6%)患有相关的风湿病,大多数患者有其他体征/症状或相关的实验室异常,提示自身免疫性疾病。这项研究表明,白细胞减少症/中性粒细胞减少症患者的ANA和RF检测在没有其他实验室异常的无症状患者中的临床应用有限,除非有症状,否则不应作为常规检查的一部分。初级保健提供者需要筛查其他异常(症状/临床发现),以确定从亚专业转诊中受益最大的患者。披露无需声明相关利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Testing for Autoimmune Disorders in the Setting of Leukopenia/Neutropenia in an Ambulatory Hematology Clinic
Introduction: Leukopenia (WBC count of Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we searched for outpatient hematology consults with a diagnosis of leukopenia and/or neutropenia using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes between 2005-2015 at Henry Ford Hospital. Data points included demographics and antibody serology. Patients were excluded if they had a known hematologic disorder, known rheumatologic disorder or were on active chemotherapy. A positive ANA or RF were considered if titers were >1:80 or RF >14 IU/mL, respectively as these are institutional cutoffs. Complete blood counts were reviewed for patients who were not excluded based on above criteria. Hematology and rheumatology notes were reviewed looking for symptoms suggestive of autoimmune conditions or if an alternative diagnosis was made. Results: A total of 561 patients were seen in our outpatient clinic during the 10 year interval with an associated diagnostic code for leukopenia/neutropenia.199 were excluded due to incomplete data or inadequate follow up period, 35 patients for known malignancy, 14 for known rheumatologic disorder, and 122 for being on active chemotherapy. The remaining 191 patients were reviewed for data analysis. Patient demographics are summarized in table 1. A total of 116 patients (61%) were tested for ANA, of which 27 (23%) were positive. 22 of those 27 (81%) patients were referred to rheumatology, 6 of which were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases (22%). RF was tested in 110 patients (58%), of which 15 were positive (14%) all were referred to rheumatology, and 5(42%) were diagnosed with rheumatologic diseases. Test results, referral rate and rheumatologic diagnosis are listed in table 2. The majority of patients who were diagnosed with rheumatologic disorders had associated findings suggestive of underlying disease (3 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had mild thrombocytopenia (100-150K/uL), 1 patient with mixed connective tissue disease had Raynaud9s phenomenon, 3 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had arthralgias and 1 had myalgias, all with correlating physical exam or radiographic findings). Other alternative diagnoses for leukopenia/neutropenia included drug induced, viral and bacterial infections, hematologic malignancies, ethnic neutropenia, transient leukopenia, and idiopathic. Conclusion: Ambulatory hematology consults for leukopenia/neutropenia are a common occurrence in practice. Our study showed that 11 patients out of 191 (6%) were found to have an associated rheumatologic disorder, with the majority having other signs/symptoms or associated lab abnormalities suggestive of autoimmune disease. This study shows that testing for ANA and RF in patients with leukopenia/neutropenia are of limited clinical utility in asymptomatic patients with no other lab abnormalities and it should not be part of a routine work up unless directed by symptoms. Primary care providers need to screen for other abnormalities (symptoms/clinical findings) in order to identify patients that would benefit most from subspecialty referral. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信