韩国语缺口P/Case下降的实验研究

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jeong-Seok Kim
{"title":"韩国语缺口P/Case下降的实验研究","authors":"Jeong-Seok Kim","doi":"10.1075/consl.22038.kim","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka\n right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and\n PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to\n investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The\n experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a\n costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments\n (in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep\n the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al.\n 2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion\n analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000;\n Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson\n 2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental investigation of P/Case‑drop in Korean gapping\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Seok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/consl.22038.kim\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka\\n right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and\\n PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to\\n investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The\\n experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a\\n costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments\\n (in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep\\n the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al.\\n 2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion\\n analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000;\\n Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson\\n 2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22038.kim\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22038.kim","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了朝鲜语gapping中P/格下降的两种句法分析:LF复制(Abe&Hoshi,1997)和PF删除(Kim,1997)。我们采用了两个在线可接受性评级实验来调查P/Case下降的分布在多大程度上受到语法和语法外约束的控制。实验结果表明,(a)线性非平行性引起间隙的处理成本,(b)P/Case下降是一种成本高昂的操作,这导致PP片段(相对于NP片段)和Case标记的NP片段(相对于无Case NP片段)的频率更高。我们认为,并行性效应源于解析器的普遍偏好,即在协调结构中保持每个连词的结构最大程度并行(Kim等人,2020)。考虑到这一点,我们得出结论,韩语间断中的P/Case下降现象可以通过PF缺失分析得到更好的解释,并辅以额外的缺失(An 20162019;Erschler 2022)和省略平行性(Frazier,Munn&Clifton 2000;Kehler 2000;Frazier和Clifton 2001;Carlson 2002),而不是通过LF复制分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An experimental investigation of P/Case‑drop in Korean gapping
This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments (in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al. 2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000; Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson 2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信