{"title":"韩国语缺口P/Case下降的实验研究","authors":"Jeong-Seok Kim","doi":"10.1075/consl.22038.kim","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka\n right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and\n PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to\n investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The\n experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a\n costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments\n (in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep\n the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al.\n 2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion\n analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000;\n Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson\n 2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental investigation of P/Case‑drop in Korean gapping\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Seok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/consl.22038.kim\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka\\n right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and\\n PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to\\n investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The\\n experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a\\n costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments\\n (in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep\\n the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al.\\n 2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion\\n analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000;\\n Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson\\n 2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22038.kim\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22038.kim","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An experimental investigation of P/Case‑drop in Korean gapping
This study examines two syntactic analyses of P/Case-drop in Korean gapping (aka
right-node-raising or right-peripheral ellipsis): LF copying (Abe & Hoshi 1997) and
PF deletion (Kim 1997). We employ two online acceptability rating experiments to
investigate to what extent the distribution of P/Case-drop is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. The
experimental findings suggest that (a) linear non-parallelism elicits a processing cost for gapping and (b) P/Case-drop is a
costly operation, which results in higher frequencies of PP fragments (in relation to NP fragments) and Case-marked NP fragments
(in relation to Case-less NP fragments). We argue that the parallelism effect follows from the parser’s general preference to keep
the structure of each conjunct maximally parallel in a coordination structure (Kim et al.
2020). Given this, we conclude that P/Case-drop phenomena in Korean gapping are better explained by a PF deletion
analysis, supplemented with extra deletion (An 2016, 2019; Erschler 2022) and ellipsis parallelism (Frazier, Munn & Clifton 2000; Kehler 2000;
Frazier & Clifton 2001; Carlson
2002), rather than by an LF copying analysis.
期刊介绍:
Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.