{"title":"本体论转向的新万物有灵论者与信仰概念","authors":"L. Hedrick","doi":"10.1086/723755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to demonstrate ways in which new materialist scholarship has been underappreciated in religious studies, particularly with regard to its complications of belief talk; second, to suggest how this underappreciation is, in part, due to a prior misunderstanding of what is “new” about new materialism; and third, to explore underrealized constructive resources posed by thinking with new animism and the closely related ontological turn in anthropology that can help scholars of religion engage difference without resorting to belief-talk.","PeriodicalId":45199,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ontological Turn’s New Animists and the Concept of Belief\",\"authors\":\"L. Hedrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to demonstrate ways in which new materialist scholarship has been underappreciated in religious studies, particularly with regard to its complications of belief talk; second, to suggest how this underappreciation is, in part, due to a prior misunderstanding of what is “new” about new materialism; and third, to explore underrealized constructive resources posed by thinking with new animism and the closely related ontological turn in anthropology that can help scholars of religion engage difference without resorting to belief-talk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Ontological Turn’s New Animists and the Concept of Belief
The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to demonstrate ways in which new materialist scholarship has been underappreciated in religious studies, particularly with regard to its complications of belief talk; second, to suggest how this underappreciation is, in part, due to a prior misunderstanding of what is “new” about new materialism; and third, to explore underrealized constructive resources posed by thinking with new animism and the closely related ontological turn in anthropology that can help scholars of religion engage difference without resorting to belief-talk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Religion is one of the publications by which the Divinity School of The University of Chicago seeks to promote critical, hermeneutical, historical, and constructive inquiry into religion. While expecting articles to advance scholarship in their respective fields in a lucid, cogent, and fresh way, the Journal is especially interested in areas of research with a broad range of implications for scholars of religion, or cross-disciplinary relevance. The Editors welcome submissions in theology, religious ethics, and philosophy of religion, as well as articles that approach the role of religion in culture and society from a historical, sociological, psychological, linguistic, or artistic standpoint.