接受冠状动脉造影的高血压患者中心主动脉血压的侵入性评估、β受体阻滞剂与非β受体阻滞剂的差异影响及其与冠状动脉疾病严重程度的相关性

Q4 Medicine
S. Behera, A. Pradhan, R. Sethi, R. Saran, V. Narain, S. Dwivedi, S. Chandra
{"title":"接受冠状动脉造影的高血压患者中心主动脉血压的侵入性评估、β受体阻滞剂与非β受体阻滞剂的差异影响及其与冠状动脉疾病严重程度的相关性","authors":"S. Behera, A. Pradhan, R. Sethi, R. Saran, V. Narain, S. Dwivedi, S. Chandra","doi":"10.5530/JCDR.2019.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-invasively measured brachial arterial pressure is accepted as the standard method for blood pressure measurement. However, systolic pressure varies throughout the arterial tree such that central systolic pressure is actually lower than corresponding brachial pressure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the differential effects of commonly used antihypertensive drugs on central aortic pressure measured invasively. Methods and Results: This was a prospective, single-centre and observational study. During the time period November 2009 to November 2010, a total of 170 patients with chronic stable angina and systemic hypertension were enrolled. Detailed medical history and physical examinations were performed. Laboratory investigations were noted. Brachial and central aortic pressures were recorded and compared. Demographic and clinical parameters were comparable among patients in different antihypertensive therapy groups. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference and mean pulse pressure (PP) ratio values between beta blocker and non-beta blocker groups were significantly different, (p<0.0001) and (p=<0.0001) respectively. Mean central SBP difference and mean pulse pressure ratio values between beta blocker arm and beta blocker combination groups arm were significantly different too, (p <0.0001 and p=0.0005 respectively). Mean SBP difference and mean PP ratio were also significantly different for beta blocker monotherapy as compared with non-beta blocker drugs individually. In each antihypertensive therapy group, moderate and severe coronary artery disease groups had significantly higher central PP levels. Conclusion: Different classes of antihypertensives have differential impact on central blood pressures. Central systolic and pulse pressures cannot be inferred accurately from brachial blood pressures. Thus, there is potential for under treatment or overtreatment of hypertension based on brachial blood pressure targets.","PeriodicalId":15222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invasive Assessment of Central Aortic Blood Pressure, Differential Impact of Beta Blocker vs. Non-Beta Blockers and their Correlation with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography\",\"authors\":\"S. Behera, A. Pradhan, R. Sethi, R. Saran, V. Narain, S. Dwivedi, S. Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/JCDR.2019.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Non-invasively measured brachial arterial pressure is accepted as the standard method for blood pressure measurement. However, systolic pressure varies throughout the arterial tree such that central systolic pressure is actually lower than corresponding brachial pressure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the differential effects of commonly used antihypertensive drugs on central aortic pressure measured invasively. Methods and Results: This was a prospective, single-centre and observational study. During the time period November 2009 to November 2010, a total of 170 patients with chronic stable angina and systemic hypertension were enrolled. Detailed medical history and physical examinations were performed. Laboratory investigations were noted. Brachial and central aortic pressures were recorded and compared. Demographic and clinical parameters were comparable among patients in different antihypertensive therapy groups. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference and mean pulse pressure (PP) ratio values between beta blocker and non-beta blocker groups were significantly different, (p<0.0001) and (p=<0.0001) respectively. Mean central SBP difference and mean pulse pressure ratio values between beta blocker arm and beta blocker combination groups arm were significantly different too, (p <0.0001 and p=0.0005 respectively). Mean SBP difference and mean PP ratio were also significantly different for beta blocker monotherapy as compared with non-beta blocker drugs individually. In each antihypertensive therapy group, moderate and severe coronary artery disease groups had significantly higher central PP levels. Conclusion: Different classes of antihypertensives have differential impact on central blood pressures. Central systolic and pulse pressures cannot be inferred accurately from brachial blood pressures. Thus, there is potential for under treatment or overtreatment of hypertension based on brachial blood pressure targets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/JCDR.2019.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/JCDR.2019.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无创测量肱动脉压是公认的血压测量的标准方法。然而,收缩压在整个动脉树中变化,因此中央收缩压实际上低于相应的肱压力。该研究的目的是评估常用降压药对有创测量的中央主动脉压的不同影响。方法和结果:这是一项前瞻性、单中心和观察性研究。在2009年11月至2010年11月期间,共纳入170例慢性稳定型心绞痛和全身性高血压患者。进行详细的病史和体格检查。已注意到实验室的调查。记录肱动脉和中央主动脉压并进行比较。不同抗高血压治疗组患者的人口学和临床参数具有可比性。阻滞剂组与非阻滞剂组的平均收缩压(SBP)差值和平均脉压(PP)比值差异有统计学意义,分别为(p<0.0001)和(p=<0.0001)。β受体阻滞剂组与β受体阻滞剂联合用药组的平均中央收缩压差和平均脉压比值也有显著差异(p <0.0001, p=0.0005)。受体阻滞剂单药治疗与非受体阻滞剂单药治疗相比,平均收缩压差和平均PP比值也有显著差异。在各降压治疗组中,中度和重度冠心病组中心PP水平均显著升高。结论:不同类型的降压药对中心血压有不同的影响。中央收缩压和脉压不能从肱血压准确推断。因此,基于肱血压靶点的高血压存在治疗不足或过度治疗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invasive Assessment of Central Aortic Blood Pressure, Differential Impact of Beta Blocker vs. Non-Beta Blockers and their Correlation with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography
Background: Non-invasively measured brachial arterial pressure is accepted as the standard method for blood pressure measurement. However, systolic pressure varies throughout the arterial tree such that central systolic pressure is actually lower than corresponding brachial pressure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the differential effects of commonly used antihypertensive drugs on central aortic pressure measured invasively. Methods and Results: This was a prospective, single-centre and observational study. During the time period November 2009 to November 2010, a total of 170 patients with chronic stable angina and systemic hypertension were enrolled. Detailed medical history and physical examinations were performed. Laboratory investigations were noted. Brachial and central aortic pressures were recorded and compared. Demographic and clinical parameters were comparable among patients in different antihypertensive therapy groups. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference and mean pulse pressure (PP) ratio values between beta blocker and non-beta blocker groups were significantly different, (p<0.0001) and (p=<0.0001) respectively. Mean central SBP difference and mean pulse pressure ratio values between beta blocker arm and beta blocker combination groups arm were significantly different too, (p <0.0001 and p=0.0005 respectively). Mean SBP difference and mean PP ratio were also significantly different for beta blocker monotherapy as compared with non-beta blocker drugs individually. In each antihypertensive therapy group, moderate and severe coronary artery disease groups had significantly higher central PP levels. Conclusion: Different classes of antihypertensives have differential impact on central blood pressures. Central systolic and pulse pressures cannot be inferred accurately from brachial blood pressures. Thus, there is potential for under treatment or overtreatment of hypertension based on brachial blood pressure targets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信