{"title":"秋水仙碱治疗新冠肺炎-Colcorona试验","authors":"P. L. D. Luz","doi":"10.33696/diabetes.3.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colcorona was a multicenter, international study promoted by the Montreal Heart Institute, Canada, whose main objective was to test the effects of colchicine in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [1]. So far, the majority of studies addressed hospitalized patients which is understandable since mortality occurs mainly among those individuals. The Colcorona, however, focused specifically in non-hospitalized patients because preventing hospitalization and death are important therapeutic targets. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, one or more risk factors, including arterial hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, coronary disease, fever, age ≥ 70 years or obesity. Diagnosis was based on positive PCR from nasal swab. Given restriction in PCR swab at beginning of the pandemic, a minority of patients were enrolled based on clinical criteria. The initial intention was to enroll 6,000 patients in a randomized, double-blind approach, comparing colchicine – 0.5 mg twice daily for the initial 3 days, followed by 0.5 mg daily for the following 27 days vs. a placebo. However, the study was terminated with 75% of enrollment for logistical reasons; thus 4,488 patients were included of whom 2,235 received colchicine and 2,253 the placebo [1].","PeriodicalId":73706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes and clinical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colchicine in COVID-19 —The Colcorona Trial\",\"authors\":\"P. L. D. Luz\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/diabetes.3.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colcorona was a multicenter, international study promoted by the Montreal Heart Institute, Canada, whose main objective was to test the effects of colchicine in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [1]. So far, the majority of studies addressed hospitalized patients which is understandable since mortality occurs mainly among those individuals. The Colcorona, however, focused specifically in non-hospitalized patients because preventing hospitalization and death are important therapeutic targets. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, one or more risk factors, including arterial hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, coronary disease, fever, age ≥ 70 years or obesity. Diagnosis was based on positive PCR from nasal swab. Given restriction in PCR swab at beginning of the pandemic, a minority of patients were enrolled based on clinical criteria. The initial intention was to enroll 6,000 patients in a randomized, double-blind approach, comparing colchicine – 0.5 mg twice daily for the initial 3 days, followed by 0.5 mg daily for the following 27 days vs. a placebo. However, the study was terminated with 75% of enrollment for logistical reasons; thus 4,488 patients were included of whom 2,235 received colchicine and 2,253 the placebo [1].\",\"PeriodicalId\":73706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of diabetes and clinical research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of diabetes and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/diabetes.3.046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/diabetes.3.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Colcorona was a multicenter, international study promoted by the Montreal Heart Institute, Canada, whose main objective was to test the effects of colchicine in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [1]. So far, the majority of studies addressed hospitalized patients which is understandable since mortality occurs mainly among those individuals. The Colcorona, however, focused specifically in non-hospitalized patients because preventing hospitalization and death are important therapeutic targets. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, one or more risk factors, including arterial hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, coronary disease, fever, age ≥ 70 years or obesity. Diagnosis was based on positive PCR from nasal swab. Given restriction in PCR swab at beginning of the pandemic, a minority of patients were enrolled based on clinical criteria. The initial intention was to enroll 6,000 patients in a randomized, double-blind approach, comparing colchicine – 0.5 mg twice daily for the initial 3 days, followed by 0.5 mg daily for the following 27 days vs. a placebo. However, the study was terminated with 75% of enrollment for logistical reasons; thus 4,488 patients were included of whom 2,235 received colchicine and 2,253 the placebo [1].