普遍主义的问题?芬兰早期儿童教育和照料机会的合理性

Q2 Social Sciences
Salla Fjällström, Kirsti Karila, M. Paananen
{"title":"普遍主义的问题?芬兰早期儿童教育和照料机会的合理性","authors":"Salla Fjällström, Kirsti Karila, M. Paananen","doi":"10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Universal access to early childhood education and care (ECEC) has become a policy goal in many countries. In comparing and categorising national ECEC systems, Finnish ECEC has been presented as an example of a universal system. However, as municipalities are responsible for the provision of ECEC services in Finland, it is important to examine how access to ECEC is locally rationalised: how universal is Finnish ECEC after all? Drawing on discursive institutionalism, we analysed what kinds of rationalities administrators of local ECEC services constructed in terms of access to ECEC concerning four-year-old children, and what kind of possible preconditions were constructed in these rationalities. As a result, we found three different but intertwined rationalities of access to ECEC: equality of access for all children, a real need for ECEC, and the parents’ choice. The parents’ position in the labour market, the level of concern for the child or family, and the parents’ decision emerged as constructed preconditions for access. Our examination illustrates the importance of examining local-level policy discourses in order to understand the historical and social constructions of access to ECEC.","PeriodicalId":52346,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":"207 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A matter of universalism? Rationalities of access in Finnish early childhood education and care\",\"authors\":\"Salla Fjällström, Kirsti Karila, M. Paananen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Universal access to early childhood education and care (ECEC) has become a policy goal in many countries. In comparing and categorising national ECEC systems, Finnish ECEC has been presented as an example of a universal system. However, as municipalities are responsible for the provision of ECEC services in Finland, it is important to examine how access to ECEC is locally rationalised: how universal is Finnish ECEC after all? Drawing on discursive institutionalism, we analysed what kinds of rationalities administrators of local ECEC services constructed in terms of access to ECEC concerning four-year-old children, and what kind of possible preconditions were constructed in these rationalities. As a result, we found three different but intertwined rationalities of access to ECEC: equality of access for all children, a real need for ECEC, and the parents’ choice. The parents’ position in the labour market, the level of concern for the child or family, and the parents’ decision emerged as constructed preconditions for access. Our examination illustrates the importance of examining local-level policy discourses in order to understand the historical and social constructions of access to ECEC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"207 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1816372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

普及幼儿教育和保育(ECEC)已成为许多国家的政策目标。在比较和分类国家ECEC制度时,芬兰ECEC已被作为一个普遍制度的例子提出。然而,由于芬兰的市政当局负责提供ECEC服务,重要的是要检查如何在当地合理使用ECEC:芬兰ECEC到底有多普遍?本文运用话语制度主义理论,分析了地方幼儿教育服务的管理者在四岁儿童幼儿教育的可及性方面构建了何种理性,以及在这些理性中构建了何种可能的前提条件。结果,我们发现了三种不同但相互交织的获得ECEC的理性:所有儿童获得ECEC的机会平等,对ECEC的真正需求,以及父母的选择。父母在劳动力市场上的地位,对孩子或家庭的关心程度,以及父母的决定,都成为获得就业机会的先决条件。我们的研究说明了为了理解进入ECEC的历史和社会结构,研究地方层面政策话语的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A matter of universalism? Rationalities of access in Finnish early childhood education and care
ABSTRACT Universal access to early childhood education and care (ECEC) has become a policy goal in many countries. In comparing and categorising national ECEC systems, Finnish ECEC has been presented as an example of a universal system. However, as municipalities are responsible for the provision of ECEC services in Finland, it is important to examine how access to ECEC is locally rationalised: how universal is Finnish ECEC after all? Drawing on discursive institutionalism, we analysed what kinds of rationalities administrators of local ECEC services constructed in terms of access to ECEC concerning four-year-old children, and what kind of possible preconditions were constructed in these rationalities. As a result, we found three different but intertwined rationalities of access to ECEC: equality of access for all children, a real need for ECEC, and the parents’ choice. The parents’ position in the labour market, the level of concern for the child or family, and the parents’ decision emerged as constructed preconditions for access. Our examination illustrates the importance of examining local-level policy discourses in order to understand the historical and social constructions of access to ECEC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信