定义语言推理

IF 0.6 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Roy Dielemans, P. Coppen
{"title":"定义语言推理","authors":"Roy Dielemans, P. Coppen","doi":"10.1075/dujal.19038.die","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Until recently, throughout the world, linguistic theory was virtually absent in secondary education, mostly limited to\n grammar teaching still based on 19th century linguistic theory. There is a growing call, however, for enriching grammar teaching with modern\n linguistic insights, integrating higher order critical thinking skills, like reasoning. This study tries to lay the groundwork for a model\n of linguistic reasoning in particular.\n Based on a well-established model for historical reasoning (Van Boxtel & Van Drie,\n 2018), a linguistic model is developed in two steps. First, the components of the historical model are theoretically analysed and\n transposed to the linguistic domain, and second, the model is applied in qualitative analysis of linguistic experts’ reasoning.\n It is found that the model fits linguistic reasoning fairy well: all central components can be observed, and are evenly\n distributed over different experts. It is concluded that the linguistic reasoning model can be used in the development of a new grammar\n pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":42420,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining linguistic reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Roy Dielemans, P. Coppen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/dujal.19038.die\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Until recently, throughout the world, linguistic theory was virtually absent in secondary education, mostly limited to\\n grammar teaching still based on 19th century linguistic theory. There is a growing call, however, for enriching grammar teaching with modern\\n linguistic insights, integrating higher order critical thinking skills, like reasoning. This study tries to lay the groundwork for a model\\n of linguistic reasoning in particular.\\n Based on a well-established model for historical reasoning (Van Boxtel & Van Drie,\\n 2018), a linguistic model is developed in two steps. First, the components of the historical model are theoretically analysed and\\n transposed to the linguistic domain, and second, the model is applied in qualitative analysis of linguistic experts’ reasoning.\\n It is found that the model fits linguistic reasoning fairy well: all central components can be observed, and are evenly\\n distributed over different experts. It is concluded that the linguistic reasoning model can be used in the development of a new grammar\\n pedagogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19038.die\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19038.die","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

直到最近,在世界范围内,语言理论在中学教育中几乎是缺席的,主要局限于语法教学,仍然基于19世纪的语言理论。然而,越来越多的人呼吁用现代语言学的见解来丰富语法教学,整合更高层次的批判性思维技能,比如推理。本研究试图为语言推理模型奠定基础。基于一个成熟的历史推理模型(Van Boxtel & Van Drie, 2018),语言模型分两个步骤开发。首先,对历史模型的组成部分进行理论分析,并将其转置到语言领域;其次,将该模型应用于语言专家推理的定性分析。结果表明,该模型很好地符合语言推理规则,所有的中心分量都能被观察到,并且均匀地分布在不同的专家身上。语言推理模型可用于发展一种新的语法教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining linguistic reasoning
Until recently, throughout the world, linguistic theory was virtually absent in secondary education, mostly limited to grammar teaching still based on 19th century linguistic theory. There is a growing call, however, for enriching grammar teaching with modern linguistic insights, integrating higher order critical thinking skills, like reasoning. This study tries to lay the groundwork for a model of linguistic reasoning in particular. Based on a well-established model for historical reasoning (Van Boxtel & Van Drie, 2018), a linguistic model is developed in two steps. First, the components of the historical model are theoretically analysed and transposed to the linguistic domain, and second, the model is applied in qualitative analysis of linguistic experts’ reasoning. It is found that the model fits linguistic reasoning fairy well: all central components can be observed, and are evenly distributed over different experts. It is concluded that the linguistic reasoning model can be used in the development of a new grammar pedagogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics (DuJAL) focuses on promoting Dutch and Belgian work in applied linguistics among an international audience, but also welcomes contributions from other countries. It caters for both the academic society in the field and for language and communication experts working in other contexts, such as institutions involved in language policy, teacher training, curriculum development, assessment, and educational and communication consultancy. DuJAL is the digital continuation of Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, which had been the journal of Anéla, the Dutch Association of Applied Linguistics, for forty years. Like its predecessor, DuJAL wants to offer a platform to young researchers in applied linguistics, i.e. PhD candidates and MA students. In order to maintain a high standard all submissions are subjected to a ‘double blind’ review by at least one external reviewer and two of the editors. Contributions may be written in Dutch, English, German or French.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信