有或没有度洛西汀的盆底肌肉锻炼或治疗的疗效:系统回顾和网络meta分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
J. Park, A-Nam Kwon, T. Noh, Y. Gwon, S. Shim, J. Kim
{"title":"有或没有度洛西汀的盆底肌肉锻炼或治疗的疗效:系统回顾和网络meta分析","authors":"J. Park, A-Nam Kwon, T. Noh, Y. Gwon, S. Shim, J. Kim","doi":"10.1080/13685538.2022.2069238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI) is a serious complication despite surgical advances. Treatment options for PPUI include conservative care like Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME), which is a physiotherapy performed by the patients themselves; Pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), a physiotherapy performed under the guidance of a therapist, and duloxetine treatment; and surgical interventions. In this study, network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed for direct comparison of these treatment options. Materials and Methods The NMA pooled the odds ratios and 95% credible intervals using the number of patients achieving urinary continence and the total number of patients in an intention-to-treat population. The treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities and the rankograms. Results The pooled overall ORs of patients achieving urinary continence compared with no treatment was 1.73 (95% CrI: 0.657, 4.71) in PFME, 2.62 (95% CrI: 0.553, 13.5) in PFME plus Duloxetine, and 4.05 (95% CrI: 1.70, 10.2) in PFMT. The SUCRA values of ranking probabilities for each treatment showed high rates of continence in the order of PFMT, PFME plus Duloxetine, and PFME. Conclusion The results suggest that patients with PPUI should undergo PFMT and consider duloxetine as an additional treatment option.","PeriodicalId":55542,"journal":{"name":"Aging Male","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercise or therapy with or without duloxetine: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Park, A-Nam Kwon, T. Noh, Y. Gwon, S. Shim, J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13685538.2022.2069238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI) is a serious complication despite surgical advances. Treatment options for PPUI include conservative care like Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME), which is a physiotherapy performed by the patients themselves; Pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), a physiotherapy performed under the guidance of a therapist, and duloxetine treatment; and surgical interventions. In this study, network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed for direct comparison of these treatment options. Materials and Methods The NMA pooled the odds ratios and 95% credible intervals using the number of patients achieving urinary continence and the total number of patients in an intention-to-treat population. The treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities and the rankograms. Results The pooled overall ORs of patients achieving urinary continence compared with no treatment was 1.73 (95% CrI: 0.657, 4.71) in PFME, 2.62 (95% CrI: 0.553, 13.5) in PFME plus Duloxetine, and 4.05 (95% CrI: 1.70, 10.2) in PFMT. The SUCRA values of ranking probabilities for each treatment showed high rates of continence in the order of PFMT, PFME plus Duloxetine, and PFME. Conclusion The results suggest that patients with PPUI should undergo PFMT and consider duloxetine as an additional treatment option.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Male\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Male\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2022.2069238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Male","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2022.2069238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPUI)是一个严重的并发症,尽管手术进展。PPUI的治疗选择包括保守治疗,如盆底肌肉运动(PFME),这是一种由患者自己进行的物理治疗;盆底肌肉治疗(PFMT),在治疗师指导下进行的物理治疗,以及度洛西汀治疗;还有手术干预。本研究采用网络元分析(NMA)对这些治疗方案进行直接比较。材料和方法NMA使用实现尿失禁的患者数量和意向治疗人群中的患者总数合并优势比和95%可信区间。根据累积排序曲线(SUCRA)概率和排序图下的表面对处理进行排序。结果与未治疗相比,PFME组患者尿失禁的总ORs为1.73 (95% CrI: 0.657, 4.71), PFME +度洛西汀组为2.62 (95% CrI: 0.553, 13.5), PFMT组为4.05 (95% CrI: 1.70, 10.2)。各治疗的排序概率SUCRA值显示,在PFMT、PFME +度洛西汀和PFME治疗中,尿失禁率较高。结论PPUI患者应接受PFMT治疗,并考虑度洛西汀作为附加治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercise or therapy with or without duloxetine: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis
Abstract Objectives Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI) is a serious complication despite surgical advances. Treatment options for PPUI include conservative care like Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME), which is a physiotherapy performed by the patients themselves; Pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), a physiotherapy performed under the guidance of a therapist, and duloxetine treatment; and surgical interventions. In this study, network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed for direct comparison of these treatment options. Materials and Methods The NMA pooled the odds ratios and 95% credible intervals using the number of patients achieving urinary continence and the total number of patients in an intention-to-treat population. The treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities and the rankograms. Results The pooled overall ORs of patients achieving urinary continence compared with no treatment was 1.73 (95% CrI: 0.657, 4.71) in PFME, 2.62 (95% CrI: 0.553, 13.5) in PFME plus Duloxetine, and 4.05 (95% CrI: 1.70, 10.2) in PFMT. The SUCRA values of ranking probabilities for each treatment showed high rates of continence in the order of PFMT, PFME plus Duloxetine, and PFME. Conclusion The results suggest that patients with PPUI should undergo PFMT and consider duloxetine as an additional treatment option.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging Male
Aging Male 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Aging Male , the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, is a multidisciplinary publication covering all aspects of male health throughout the aging process. The Journal is a well-recognized and respected resource for anyone interested in keeping up to date with developments in this field. It is published quarterly in one volume per year. The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material that provide researchers with an integrated perspective on this new, emerging specialty. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Diagnosis and treatment of late-onset hypogonadism Metabolic syndrome and related conditions Treatment of erectile dysfunction and related disorders Prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信