{"title":"编辑简介","authors":"Catharine Dann Roeber","doi":"10.1086/723779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ARCHITECTURE often sparks strong opinions. Who has not glanced at a residence or entered a museum and felt either admiration (“I love that house!”) or dislike (“That place is SO ugly!”)? The livelihood of architectural historians, journalists, and reviewers of the built environment has long rested on their ability to evaluate buildings for professional and avocational readers alike. One thing is certain, though, opinions about a building’s success vary widely and often relate to perceptions about whether it expresses an “original” idea in wood, stone, glass, metal, and other materials. But what is original? Can repurposed design elements or architectural fabric count as something new? Does critical acclaim or functional utility even matter if the built environment satisfies its patrons? Articles in this issue of Winterthur Portfolio discuss two buildings, a little-known private home and a well-known museum, and the varied responses to the structures’ mimetic attributes. Amy D. Finstein’s “A Gropius-Breuer House like Notable Others: Consumerism, Copying, and Connoisseurship in an Unsung Commission” and Sandra Tomc’s “The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum: AVenice Spectacle” highlight buildings that were, in their own ways, intentionally not “original” but rather demonstrated international design conversations in American settings. We see individuals ranging from a wealthy socialite to an up-and-coming doctor incorporating European references into their American buildings. By taking a closer look at these two projects and their patrons, the contexts for their creation, rather than value judgments such as original or derivative, take center stage. By highlighting the Abele House in Framingham, Massachusetts (1941), as an important material expression of midcentury consumer culture, Finstein counters critics’ and scholars’ dismissal of it as a not altogether successful mashup of famed architects’ Walter Gropius’s and Marcel Breuer’s own houses nearby. She argues that, for Abele, selecting elements","PeriodicalId":43437,"journal":{"name":"WINTERTHUR PORTFOLIO-A JOURNAL OF AMERICAN MATERIAL CULTURE","volume":"56 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Catharine Dann Roeber\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ARCHITECTURE often sparks strong opinions. Who has not glanced at a residence or entered a museum and felt either admiration (“I love that house!”) or dislike (“That place is SO ugly!”)? The livelihood of architectural historians, journalists, and reviewers of the built environment has long rested on their ability to evaluate buildings for professional and avocational readers alike. One thing is certain, though, opinions about a building’s success vary widely and often relate to perceptions about whether it expresses an “original” idea in wood, stone, glass, metal, and other materials. But what is original? Can repurposed design elements or architectural fabric count as something new? Does critical acclaim or functional utility even matter if the built environment satisfies its patrons? Articles in this issue of Winterthur Portfolio discuss two buildings, a little-known private home and a well-known museum, and the varied responses to the structures’ mimetic attributes. Amy D. Finstein’s “A Gropius-Breuer House like Notable Others: Consumerism, Copying, and Connoisseurship in an Unsung Commission” and Sandra Tomc’s “The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum: AVenice Spectacle” highlight buildings that were, in their own ways, intentionally not “original” but rather demonstrated international design conversations in American settings. We see individuals ranging from a wealthy socialite to an up-and-coming doctor incorporating European references into their American buildings. By taking a closer look at these two projects and their patrons, the contexts for their creation, rather than value judgments such as original or derivative, take center stage. By highlighting the Abele House in Framingham, Massachusetts (1941), as an important material expression of midcentury consumer culture, Finstein counters critics’ and scholars’ dismissal of it as a not altogether successful mashup of famed architects’ Walter Gropius’s and Marcel Breuer’s own houses nearby. She argues that, for Abele, selecting elements\",\"PeriodicalId\":43437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WINTERTHUR PORTFOLIO-A JOURNAL OF AMERICAN MATERIAL CULTURE\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WINTERTHUR PORTFOLIO-A JOURNAL OF AMERICAN MATERIAL CULTURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WINTERTHUR PORTFOLIO-A JOURNAL OF AMERICAN MATERIAL CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
建筑常常引发强烈的意见。谁看过一所住宅或走进博物馆,不是赞叹(“我爱那所房子!”)就是厌恶(“那地方真丑!”)?长期以来,建筑历史学家、记者和建筑环境评论家的生计一直依赖于他们为专业读者和业余读者评估建筑的能力。不过,有一点是肯定的,人们对一栋建筑是否成功的看法千差万别,而且往往与人们对它是否用木材、石头、玻璃、金属和其他材料表达了“原创”想法的看法有关。但什么是原创?重新设计的设计元素或建筑结构可以算作新事物吗?如果建筑环境满足了它的赞助人,那么对它的评价或功能效用是否重要呢?本期《Winterthur作品集》的文章讨论了两座建筑,一个鲜为人知的私人住宅和一个知名的博物馆,以及对建筑模仿属性的不同反应。艾米·d·芬斯坦(Amy D. Finstein)的《格罗皮乌斯-布鲁尔住宅:默默无闻的委员会中的消费主义、复制和鉴赏力》(A Gropius-Breuer House)和桑德拉·汤姆(Sandra Tomc)的《伊莎贝拉·斯图尔特·加德纳博物馆:大街奇观》(The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum: AVenice奇观)突出了这些建筑,它们以自己的方式故意不“原创”,而是展示了美国背景下的国际设计对话。我们看到,从富有的社交名媛到前途无量的医生,各种各样的人都在他们的美国建筑中融入了欧洲元素。通过仔细观察这两个项目及其赞助人,它们的创作背景,而不是诸如原创或衍生之类的价值判断,占据了中心位置。芬斯坦强调了马萨诸塞州弗雷明汉的阿贝尔之家(1941年),作为中世纪消费文化的重要物质表达,反驳了评论家和学者对它的贬低,认为它是著名建筑师沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯和马塞尔·布鲁尔自己的房子附近的不完全成功的混在一起。她认为,对于阿贝尔来说,选择元素
ARCHITECTURE often sparks strong opinions. Who has not glanced at a residence or entered a museum and felt either admiration (“I love that house!”) or dislike (“That place is SO ugly!”)? The livelihood of architectural historians, journalists, and reviewers of the built environment has long rested on their ability to evaluate buildings for professional and avocational readers alike. One thing is certain, though, opinions about a building’s success vary widely and often relate to perceptions about whether it expresses an “original” idea in wood, stone, glass, metal, and other materials. But what is original? Can repurposed design elements or architectural fabric count as something new? Does critical acclaim or functional utility even matter if the built environment satisfies its patrons? Articles in this issue of Winterthur Portfolio discuss two buildings, a little-known private home and a well-known museum, and the varied responses to the structures’ mimetic attributes. Amy D. Finstein’s “A Gropius-Breuer House like Notable Others: Consumerism, Copying, and Connoisseurship in an Unsung Commission” and Sandra Tomc’s “The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum: AVenice Spectacle” highlight buildings that were, in their own ways, intentionally not “original” but rather demonstrated international design conversations in American settings. We see individuals ranging from a wealthy socialite to an up-and-coming doctor incorporating European references into their American buildings. By taking a closer look at these two projects and their patrons, the contexts for their creation, rather than value judgments such as original or derivative, take center stage. By highlighting the Abele House in Framingham, Massachusetts (1941), as an important material expression of midcentury consumer culture, Finstein counters critics’ and scholars’ dismissal of it as a not altogether successful mashup of famed architects’ Walter Gropius’s and Marcel Breuer’s own houses nearby. She argues that, for Abele, selecting elements