附属承包商:雅典的蒂蒙、合作写作与戏剧资本主义

IF 0.1 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Raphael Magarik
{"title":"附属承包商:雅典的蒂蒙、合作写作与戏剧资本主义","authors":"Raphael Magarik","doi":"10.1353/jem.2019.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:William Shakespeare and Thomas Middleton's Timon of Athens is not only a co-authored play but also a play about co-authorship. Timon contrasts the stultifying effects of artistic patronage with the exchange of alienated labor, explaining in the process both the peculiarities of the Alcibiades subplot and the significance of Middleton's comedy. Engaging and assessing recent scholarship on collaboration, this article argues that Renaissance theatrical collaboration represents not an original state prior to the imposition of individualist Romantic ideology, but rather an innovative result of newly flexible, complex, and capitalist theatrical economies. Thinking of collaboration in economic terms foregrounds its links to alienation and to exploitation, accounting for inequalities and asymmetries between writers. Using this approach, we can see that Timon charts the collapse of patronage relations and the emergence of a newly impersonal, capitalist basis for exchange.","PeriodicalId":42614,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"28 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jem.2019.0015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dependent Contractors: Timon of Athens, Collaborative Writing, and Theatrical Capitalism\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Magarik\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jem.2019.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:William Shakespeare and Thomas Middleton's Timon of Athens is not only a co-authored play but also a play about co-authorship. Timon contrasts the stultifying effects of artistic patronage with the exchange of alienated labor, explaining in the process both the peculiarities of the Alcibiades subplot and the significance of Middleton's comedy. Engaging and assessing recent scholarship on collaboration, this article argues that Renaissance theatrical collaboration represents not an original state prior to the imposition of individualist Romantic ideology, but rather an innovative result of newly flexible, complex, and capitalist theatrical economies. Thinking of collaboration in economic terms foregrounds its links to alienation and to exploitation, accounting for inequalities and asymmetries between writers. Using this approach, we can see that Timon charts the collapse of patronage relations and the emergence of a newly impersonal, capitalist basis for exchange.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jem.2019.0015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2019.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2019.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

莎士比亚和米德尔顿的《雅典的提蒙》既是一部合作戏剧,也是一部关于合作的戏剧。蒂蒙将艺术赞助的乏味效果与异化劳动的交换进行了对比,在这个过程中解释了阿尔西比亚德斯次要情节的特点和米德尔顿喜剧的意义。本文参与并评估了最近关于合作的学术研究,认为文艺复兴时期的戏剧合作不是个人主义浪漫主义意识形态强加之前的原始状态,而是新的灵活、复杂和资本主义戏剧经济的创新结果。从经济角度思考合作,突出了其与异化和剥削的联系,解释了作家之间的不平等和不对称。使用这种方法,我们可以看到蒂蒙描绘了赞助关系的崩溃和新的非个人资本主义交换基础的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dependent Contractors: Timon of Athens, Collaborative Writing, and Theatrical Capitalism
abstract:William Shakespeare and Thomas Middleton's Timon of Athens is not only a co-authored play but also a play about co-authorship. Timon contrasts the stultifying effects of artistic patronage with the exchange of alienated labor, explaining in the process both the peculiarities of the Alcibiades subplot and the significance of Middleton's comedy. Engaging and assessing recent scholarship on collaboration, this article argues that Renaissance theatrical collaboration represents not an original state prior to the imposition of individualist Romantic ideology, but rather an innovative result of newly flexible, complex, and capitalist theatrical economies. Thinking of collaboration in economic terms foregrounds its links to alienation and to exploitation, accounting for inequalities and asymmetries between writers. Using this approach, we can see that Timon charts the collapse of patronage relations and the emergence of a newly impersonal, capitalist basis for exchange.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信