开始使用脊髓阿片类药物治疗疼痛的临床研究:一种新的历史回顾方法。

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Igor Kissin
{"title":"开始使用脊髓阿片类药物治疗疼痛的临床研究:一种新的历史回顾方法。","authors":"Igor Kissin","doi":"10.2174/2772432817666220609093243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioids administered into the spinal space by intrathecal or epidural routes can provide potent and prolonged selective analgesia. Compared to the systemic administration of opioids, spinal administration can bring about analgesia with fewer central and systemic adverse effects. For the past 40 years, spinal opioid analgesia has achieved great popularity in various fields of pain treatment. The aim of this work is to identify clinical studies that initiated the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain. To determine the historical role of each of the review's studies we used the combination of two factors: the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of its acknowl-edgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the count of citations indicated a sufficient acknowledgement by the other authors. The citation impact was assessed as the initial citation count - for period of five years after the year of article publication - and the total count. The selection of studies most important for the introduction of spinal opioids to clinical practice was based on two factors - the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of acknowledgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the citation count was indicative of sufficient acknowledgement by other authors. Analysis of the related data shows that the clinical studies initiating the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain belong to two groups of authors - Wang et al. and Behar et al. Both studies were published in 1979 and described delivery of morphine into the spinal space, although the techniques of administration were different: Wang et al. injected morphine intrathecally, Behar et al. administered morphine epidurally. The response to these studies was overwhelming -- close to a dozen reports on this topic were published in 1979 and more than a hundred - in 1980-1981. The total citation response to the Wang et al. article reached 699, and that to Behar et al. - 518. Two earlier records (1900-1901) of the use of intrathecal morphine, by Nicolae Racoviceanu-Pitesti and Otojiro Kitagawa, found no following in medical literature for more than three quarters of a century.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical studies that initiated the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain: A new approach to historical review.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Kissin\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2772432817666220609093243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Opioids administered into the spinal space by intrathecal or epidural routes can provide potent and prolonged selective analgesia. Compared to the systemic administration of opioids, spinal administration can bring about analgesia with fewer central and systemic adverse effects. For the past 40 years, spinal opioid analgesia has achieved great popularity in various fields of pain treatment. The aim of this work is to identify clinical studies that initiated the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain. To determine the historical role of each of the review's studies we used the combination of two factors: the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of its acknowl-edgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the count of citations indicated a sufficient acknowledgement by the other authors. The citation impact was assessed as the initial citation count - for period of five years after the year of article publication - and the total count. The selection of studies most important for the introduction of spinal opioids to clinical practice was based on two factors - the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of acknowledgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the citation count was indicative of sufficient acknowledgement by other authors. Analysis of the related data shows that the clinical studies initiating the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain belong to two groups of authors - Wang et al. and Behar et al. Both studies were published in 1979 and described delivery of morphine into the spinal space, although the techniques of administration were different: Wang et al. injected morphine intrathecally, Behar et al. administered morphine epidurally. The response to these studies was overwhelming -- close to a dozen reports on this topic were published in 1979 and more than a hundred - in 1980-1981. The total citation response to the Wang et al. article reached 699, and that to Behar et al. - 518. Two earlier records (1900-1901) of the use of intrathecal morphine, by Nicolae Racoviceanu-Pitesti and Otojiro Kitagawa, found no following in medical literature for more than three quarters of a century.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772432817666220609093243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772432817666220609093243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物通过鞘内或硬膜外途径进入脊髓间隙可以提供有效和持久的选择性镇痛。与阿片类药物的全身给药相比,脊髓给药可以带来较少的中枢和全身不良反应。在过去的40年里,脊髓阿片类镇痛在疼痛治疗的各个领域都得到了广泛的应用。这项工作的目的是确定开始使用脊髓阿片类药物治疗疼痛的临床研究。为了确定每一篇综述研究的历史作用,我们使用了两个因素的组合:发表时间方面的研究优先级和引用影响形式的承认程度。发表日期被视为主要因素,但前提是引用次数表明其他作者充分承认。引用影响被评估为文章发表后五年的初始引用次数和总次数。选择对将脊柱阿片类药物引入临床实践最重要的研究是基于两个因素——研究发表时间的优先顺序和引用影响形式的认可程度。发表日期被视为主要因素,但前提是引用次数表明其他作者有足够的认可。对相关数据的分析表明,开始使用脊髓阿片类药物治疗疼痛的临床研究属于两组作者——王等人和Behar等人。这两项研究都发表于1979年,描述了将吗啡输送到脊髓间隙,尽管给药技术不同:王等人鞘内注射吗啡,Behar等人硬膜外注射吗啡。对这些研究的反应是压倒性的——1979年发表了近12份关于这一主题的报告,1980-1981年发表了100多份。对王等人文章的总引用回复达到699,对贝哈尔等人的总引用回应达到518。Nicolae Racoviceanu Pitesti和Otojiro Kitagawa的两份关于鞘内吗啡使用的早期记录(1900-1901)在超过四分之三个世纪的医学文献中没有发现后续记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical studies that initiated the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain: A new approach to historical review.

Opioids administered into the spinal space by intrathecal or epidural routes can provide potent and prolonged selective analgesia. Compared to the systemic administration of opioids, spinal administration can bring about analgesia with fewer central and systemic adverse effects. For the past 40 years, spinal opioid analgesia has achieved great popularity in various fields of pain treatment. The aim of this work is to identify clinical studies that initiated the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain. To determine the historical role of each of the review's studies we used the combination of two factors: the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of its acknowl-edgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the count of citations indicated a sufficient acknowledgement by the other authors. The citation impact was assessed as the initial citation count - for period of five years after the year of article publication - and the total count. The selection of studies most important for the introduction of spinal opioids to clinical practice was based on two factors - the study priority in terms of the time of its publication and the degree of acknowledgement in the form of citation impact. The date of publication was regarded as the primary factor, but only if the citation count was indicative of sufficient acknowledgement by other authors. Analysis of the related data shows that the clinical studies initiating the use of spinal opioids for the treatment of pain belong to two groups of authors - Wang et al. and Behar et al. Both studies were published in 1979 and described delivery of morphine into the spinal space, although the techniques of administration were different: Wang et al. injected morphine intrathecally, Behar et al. administered morphine epidurally. The response to these studies was overwhelming -- close to a dozen reports on this topic were published in 1979 and more than a hundred - in 1980-1981. The total citation response to the Wang et al. article reached 699, and that to Behar et al. - 518. Two earlier records (1900-1901) of the use of intrathecal morphine, by Nicolae Racoviceanu-Pitesti and Otojiro Kitagawa, found no following in medical literature for more than three quarters of a century.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信