成人急诊科患者COVID-19疫苗犹豫

Catherine Hobbs, Mira C. Patel
{"title":"成人急诊科患者COVID-19疫苗犹豫","authors":"Catherine Hobbs, Mira C. Patel","doi":"10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction \nVaccine hesitancy is a nationally resonant issue that must be evaluated to address the spread and overwhelming complications of COVID-19 in the United States. Emergency departments (EDs) often serve disadvantaged populations who may experience disproportionate pandemic complications. We sought to gain an updated understanding of vaccine hesitancy levels in a single ED, especially following wide-scale distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and during the spread of the Delta COVID-19 variant. \nMethods \nWe surveyed a convenience sample of non-COVID positive ED patients at an urban level 1 trauma center to measure patients’ vaccine rates for COVID-19 and influenza. We obtained demographics and perspectives by interview on reasons why COVID-19 vaccination was or was not obtained utilizing previously published instruments. \nResults \nAmong 100 patients enrolled, 78% were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 22% were unvaccinated. The sample of participants was majority white, middle-aged, educated beyond high school, and medically-insured. Vaccine hesitancy was not significantly linked to any demographic groups, other than a slightly significant relationship with those with lower education levels and those who identified as white. Of the unvaccinated participants, the most frequent reason for refusing the vaccine was concern about the side effects or safety. \nConclusion \nOur data suggests vaccine hesitancy persists in about 1 out of 5 emergency department patients. Education on COVID-19 vaccine safety may improve uptake.","PeriodicalId":93630,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Adult Emergency Department Patients\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Hobbs, Mira C. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction \\nVaccine hesitancy is a nationally resonant issue that must be evaluated to address the spread and overwhelming complications of COVID-19 in the United States. Emergency departments (EDs) often serve disadvantaged populations who may experience disproportionate pandemic complications. We sought to gain an updated understanding of vaccine hesitancy levels in a single ED, especially following wide-scale distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and during the spread of the Delta COVID-19 variant. \\nMethods \\nWe surveyed a convenience sample of non-COVID positive ED patients at an urban level 1 trauma center to measure patients’ vaccine rates for COVID-19 and influenza. We obtained demographics and perspectives by interview on reasons why COVID-19 vaccination was or was not obtained utilizing previously published instruments. \\nResults \\nAmong 100 patients enrolled, 78% were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 22% were unvaccinated. The sample of participants was majority white, middle-aged, educated beyond high school, and medically-insured. Vaccine hesitancy was not significantly linked to any demographic groups, other than a slightly significant relationship with those with lower education levels and those who identified as white. Of the unvaccinated participants, the most frequent reason for refusing the vaccine was concern about the side effects or safety. \\nConclusion \\nOur data suggests vaccine hesitancy persists in about 1 out of 5 emergency department patients. Education on COVID-19 vaccine safety may improve uptake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言疫苗犹豫是一个引起全国共鸣的问题,必须对其进行评估,以解决新冠肺炎在美国的传播和严重并发症。急诊科通常为弱势人群提供服务,他们可能会经历不成比例的流行病并发症。我们试图获得对单个ED中疫苗犹豫水平的最新了解,特别是在新冠肺炎疫苗大规模分发之后以及在新冠肺炎德尔塔变异株传播期间。方法我们在城市一级创伤中心对非COVID阳性ED患者进行方便抽样调查,以测量患者的新冠肺炎和流感疫苗接种率。我们通过访谈获得了人口统计数据和观点,了解新冠肺炎疫苗接种是或不是利用先前发表的工具获得的。结果在100名入选患者中,78%的患者接种了新冠肺炎疫苗,22%的患者未接种疫苗。参与者的样本大多是白人、中年人、受过高中以上教育并有医疗保险。疫苗犹豫与任何人口群体都没有显著联系,只是与教育水平较低的人群和被认定为白人的人群有轻微的显著关系。在未接种疫苗的参与者中,拒绝接种疫苗的最常见原因是担心副作用或安全性。结论我们的数据表明,大约五分之一的急诊科患者对疫苗犹豫不决。新冠肺炎疫苗安全性教育可能会提高接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Adult Emergency Department Patients
Introduction Vaccine hesitancy is a nationally resonant issue that must be evaluated to address the spread and overwhelming complications of COVID-19 in the United States. Emergency departments (EDs) often serve disadvantaged populations who may experience disproportionate pandemic complications. We sought to gain an updated understanding of vaccine hesitancy levels in a single ED, especially following wide-scale distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and during the spread of the Delta COVID-19 variant. Methods We surveyed a convenience sample of non-COVID positive ED patients at an urban level 1 trauma center to measure patients’ vaccine rates for COVID-19 and influenza. We obtained demographics and perspectives by interview on reasons why COVID-19 vaccination was or was not obtained utilizing previously published instruments. Results Among 100 patients enrolled, 78% were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 22% were unvaccinated. The sample of participants was majority white, middle-aged, educated beyond high school, and medically-insured. Vaccine hesitancy was not significantly linked to any demographic groups, other than a slightly significant relationship with those with lower education levels and those who identified as white. Of the unvaccinated participants, the most frequent reason for refusing the vaccine was concern about the side effects or safety. Conclusion Our data suggests vaccine hesitancy persists in about 1 out of 5 emergency department patients. Education on COVID-19 vaccine safety may improve uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信