跨股TAVI中的血管闭合装置:一组来自现实世界的人

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
REC Interventional Cardiology Pub Date : 2023-06-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24875/RECIC.M23000380
Sofia Martinho, Elisabete Jorge, Vera Marinho, Rui Baptista, Marco Costa, Lino Gonçalves
{"title":"跨股TAVI中的血管闭合装置:一组来自现实世界的人","authors":"Sofia Martinho, Elisabete Jorge, Vera Marinho, Rui Baptista, Marco Costa, Lino Gonçalves","doi":"10.24875/RECIC.M23000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; <i>P</i> = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; <i>P</i> = .019). No other inter-group differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The MANTA Vascular Closure Device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort].\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Martinho, Elisabete Jorge, Vera Marinho, Rui Baptista, Marco Costa, Lino Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/RECIC.M23000380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; <i>P</i> = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; <i>P</i> = .019). No other inter-group differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M23000380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M23000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

它在2020年3月至2022年2月期间以曼塔收盘。主要疗效结果的衡量标准是使用VARC-3定义的CSD失败的发生率。结果:92.2%(n=226)的患者成功关闭了大口径通道。根据VARC-3的定义,没有报告与基于插头的CSD相关的重要血管或出血并发症。CSD失败的患者(7.8%)的股动脉最小直径明显较小(6.6±1.1 vs 7.6±1.4 mm;p=0.005),因此鞘直径与股动脉的比率明显较高(0.78±0.16 vs 0.69±0.15;p=0.019)。各组之间没有其他差异。结论:在这一来自连续TAVI-TF患者的大型未经选择的单中心、现实世界队列中,基于塞子的CSD用于关闭大口径动脉切除术是有效和安全的,从而可以以较低的并发症率管理动脉通路部位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The MANTA Vascular Closure Device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort].

Introduction and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition.

Results: Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; P = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; P = .019). No other inter-group differences were found.

Conclusions: In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信