两种不同学习技能教学方法的比较:大流行时期的评价

S. Çelik, E. Karahan, S. Altıntaş, Özge Uçar
{"title":"两种不同学习技能教学方法的比较:大流行时期的评价","authors":"S. Çelik, E. Karahan, S. Altıntaş, Özge Uçar","doi":"10.33457/ijhsrp.1316723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two different techniques, distance and face-to-face education, in the acquisition of learning skills related to the course of an applied undergraduate program course in the ongoing pandemic conditions. This one-group, semi-experimental study was completed with 68 students. \"Participant Information Form\", \"Instruction Form for Preparing Practice Videos\" and \"Guide to Practice Learning Skills\" were used in data collection. The study was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the course was taught through distance education with theoretical information and educational videos. In the second stage, students were asked to apply first aid, record it on video and send the file via the e-lesson system. In the third stage, the applications were explained face to face by the lecturer in the laboratory environment and the students were instructed to do these applications. Data were analyzed using SPSS programme. The mean age of the participants was 20.64±0.91 years, while 69.1% (n=47) were female, and 31.9% (n=21) were male. Among the participants, 26.5% (n=18) had previously received training about first aid, where 55.5% (n=10) of those who had stated that they received this training in high school. It was determined that the grades that the participants received after the face-to-face applied education process were significantly higher than the grades they received after the distance education process (p","PeriodicalId":32502,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR TEACHING LEARNING SKILLS: EVALUATION IN THE PERIOD OF PANDEMIC\",\"authors\":\"S. Çelik, E. Karahan, S. Altıntaş, Özge Uçar\",\"doi\":\"10.33457/ijhsrp.1316723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two different techniques, distance and face-to-face education, in the acquisition of learning skills related to the course of an applied undergraduate program course in the ongoing pandemic conditions. This one-group, semi-experimental study was completed with 68 students. \\\"Participant Information Form\\\", \\\"Instruction Form for Preparing Practice Videos\\\" and \\\"Guide to Practice Learning Skills\\\" were used in data collection. The study was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the course was taught through distance education with theoretical information and educational videos. In the second stage, students were asked to apply first aid, record it on video and send the file via the e-lesson system. In the third stage, the applications were explained face to face by the lecturer in the laboratory environment and the students were instructed to do these applications. Data were analyzed using SPSS programme. The mean age of the participants was 20.64±0.91 years, while 69.1% (n=47) were female, and 31.9% (n=21) were male. Among the participants, 26.5% (n=18) had previously received training about first aid, where 55.5% (n=10) of those who had stated that they received this training in high school. It was determined that the grades that the participants received after the face-to-face applied education process were significantly higher than the grades they received after the distance education process (p\",\"PeriodicalId\":32502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1316723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1316723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

其目的是调查远程和面对面教育这两种不同技术在当前大流行条件下获得与应用本科课程课程相关的学习技能方面的有效性。这项单组半实验研究由68名学生完成。数据收集采用《参与者信息表》、《练习录像制作指导表》和《练习学习技巧指南》。这项研究分三个阶段进行。第一阶段采用远程教学方式,结合理论资料和教学录像进行教学。在第二阶段,学生们被要求应用急救,并将其录制成视频,并通过电子教学系统发送文件。第三阶段,由讲师在实验室环境中对应用程序进行面对面的讲解,指导学生进行应用。数据采用SPSS软件进行分析。参与者平均年龄为20.64±0.91岁,其中女性占69.1% (n=47),男性占31.9% (n=21)。在参与者中,26.5% (n=18)先前接受过急救培训,其中55.5% (n=10)的人表示他们在高中接受过这种培训。结果表明,参与者在接受面对面应用教育后的成绩显著高于接受远程教育后的成绩(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR TEACHING LEARNING SKILLS: EVALUATION IN THE PERIOD OF PANDEMIC
It was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two different techniques, distance and face-to-face education, in the acquisition of learning skills related to the course of an applied undergraduate program course in the ongoing pandemic conditions. This one-group, semi-experimental study was completed with 68 students. "Participant Information Form", "Instruction Form for Preparing Practice Videos" and "Guide to Practice Learning Skills" were used in data collection. The study was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the course was taught through distance education with theoretical information and educational videos. In the second stage, students were asked to apply first aid, record it on video and send the file via the e-lesson system. In the third stage, the applications were explained face to face by the lecturer in the laboratory environment and the students were instructed to do these applications. Data were analyzed using SPSS programme. The mean age of the participants was 20.64±0.91 years, while 69.1% (n=47) were female, and 31.9% (n=21) were male. Among the participants, 26.5% (n=18) had previously received training about first aid, where 55.5% (n=10) of those who had stated that they received this training in high school. It was determined that the grades that the participants received after the face-to-face applied education process were significantly higher than the grades they received after the distance education process (p
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信