从粪便中回收苋菜杂草种子的方法比较

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Melissa L. Wilson, Anthony Brusa, Hatley Christensen, Samuel Strack, Eddie Alto, Luis F. Allen, Scott D. Cortus, Chryseis Modderman, Roger L. Becker
{"title":"从粪便中回收苋菜杂草种子的方法比较","authors":"Melissa L. Wilson,&nbsp;Anthony Brusa,&nbsp;Hatley Christensen,&nbsp;Samuel Strack,&nbsp;Eddie Alto,&nbsp;Luis F. Allen,&nbsp;Scott D. Cortus,&nbsp;Chryseis Modderman,&nbsp;Roger L. Becker","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land-applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are time consuming and often inconclusive. Although new genetic seed testing is making detection easier, methods to separate seed from contaminated manure are needed. Six methods were compared for their ability to recover 100 Palmer amaranth seeds added to bedded or nonbedded cattle manure: dry sieving, rinse sieving, manure saturation sieving without blending and with blending, and dispersion sieving without blending and with blending. Seed recovery was highest (&gt;90%) with the rinse sieving method regardless of manure type. The dispersion methods are not recommended as they recovered &lt;24.7% of seeds. Following each method, genetic testing successfully identified Palmer amaranth presence, indicating no interference of recovery method with DNA extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure\",\"authors\":\"Melissa L. Wilson,&nbsp;Anthony Brusa,&nbsp;Hatley Christensen,&nbsp;Samuel Strack,&nbsp;Eddie Alto,&nbsp;Luis F. Allen,&nbsp;Scott D. Cortus,&nbsp;Chryseis Modderman,&nbsp;Roger L. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ael2.20065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land-applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are time consuming and often inconclusive. Although new genetic seed testing is making detection easier, methods to separate seed from contaminated manure are needed. Six methods were compared for their ability to recover 100 Palmer amaranth seeds added to bedded or nonbedded cattle manure: dry sieving, rinse sieving, manure saturation sieving without blending and with blending, and dispersion sieving without blending and with blending. Seed recovery was highest (&gt;90%) with the rinse sieving method regardless of manure type. The dispersion methods are not recommended as they recovered &lt;24.7% of seeds. Following each method, genetic testing successfully identified Palmer amaranth presence, indicating no interference of recovery method with DNA extraction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Palmer amaranth(Amaranthus palmeri S.Watson)入侵新地区的一条途径是进口受污染的牲畜饲料,然后污染土地施用的肥料。如果怀疑饲料受到污染,就需要检测工具来检测粪便,但传统的方法很耗时,而且往往没有结论。尽管新的基因种子检测使检测变得更容易,但仍需要从受污染的粪便中分离种子的方法。比较了六种方法回收添加到有床或无床牛粪中的100粒帕尔默苋种子的能力:干筛、漂洗筛、无混合和有混合的粪肥饱和筛,以及无混合和混合的分散筛。无论粪肥类型如何,冲洗筛分法的种子回收率最高(>90%)。不推荐使用分散方法,因为它们回收的种子少于24.7%。在每种方法之后,基因测试都成功地确定了Palmer苋的存在,表明回收方法对DNA提取没有干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure

Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure

One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land-applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are time consuming and often inconclusive. Although new genetic seed testing is making detection easier, methods to separate seed from contaminated manure are needed. Six methods were compared for their ability to recover 100 Palmer amaranth seeds added to bedded or nonbedded cattle manure: dry sieving, rinse sieving, manure saturation sieving without blending and with blending, and dispersion sieving without blending and with blending. Seed recovery was highest (>90%) with the rinse sieving method regardless of manure type. The dispersion methods are not recommended as they recovered <24.7% of seeds. Following each method, genetic testing successfully identified Palmer amaranth presence, indicating no interference of recovery method with DNA extraction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信