{"title":"编辑","authors":"Nicola Yelland","doi":"10.1177/14639491231153289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the first issue of 2023, we publish six articles, a colloquium and a book review that reflect the range and diversity of the field. The articles consider superdiversity and gender diversity, a review of research regarding the Anthropocene, experiences with the more-than-human, and children’s rights. Since we entered the global pandemic in 2020, it seems paradoxically inevitable that time has both stopped and moved with unstoppable speed. At the time of writing, the numbers of people contracting and being hospitalised with COVID-19 seem to be on the rise as the northern hemisphere progresses through winter, and in the south we welcome visitors from all over the globe seeking respite from the cold, as well as from the pandemic. Everyone seems to be craving a return to ‘normal’ that is being characterised with the term ‘the new normal’, while many of us regard normal as being irrelevant, or non-existent, and seek just to live fulfilling and sustainable lives. The articles in this issue seek new and alternative ways of reflecting on children’s lives as we move slowly on from the identification of the global pandemic, with the hope that the schism created offers us hope for doing things differently, to obtain more equitable and just childhoods for all children and their families and communities. In the first article, Chan and Ritchie ask us to participate in ‘Exploring a Tiriti-based superdiversity paradigm within early childhood care and education in Aotearoa New Zealand’. The article uses the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Treaty of Waitangi, on Indigenous rights) to report the findings of their study, which ‘used a process of document analysis to examine early childhood care and education responses to increasing superdiversity in the “bicultural” legislative context of Aotearoa New Zealand’. The authors consider official documents that privilege the settler population’s view of Indigenous and migrant populations, which they deem to be ‘vulnerable’. They then use the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Vertovec’s (2007, 2019) superdiversity approach to explore these representations in an attempt to reconceptualise ways in which the nation’s priority learners might be supported. Next, Merewether interrogates one aspect of Piaget’s original works related to young children’s animism in ‘Enchanted animism: A matter of care’. Piaget maintained that young children can be characterised as being at a stage of ‘primitive thought’ prior to becoming more rational at a later stage. Merewether’s article calls for us to rethink this notion and suggests that ‘children’s animism, or “enchanted animism”’, is a ‘matter of care’, which then enables ‘an ethic of living more responsively and attentively with more-than-human others’. In her article, Merewether maintains that young children’s playful and enchanted animism enables them to experience their lifeworlds, including the more-than-human, in new and dynamic ways, and that adults should be attuned to this new way of thinking. Timmons and Airton also interrogate official documents in their article, ‘Welcoming gender diversity in the early years: Interpreting professional guiding documents for gender-expansive practice’. In this article, the documents pertain to human rights protection across Canada – in particular Editorial","PeriodicalId":46773,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Yelland\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14639491231153289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the first issue of 2023, we publish six articles, a colloquium and a book review that reflect the range and diversity of the field. The articles consider superdiversity and gender diversity, a review of research regarding the Anthropocene, experiences with the more-than-human, and children’s rights. Since we entered the global pandemic in 2020, it seems paradoxically inevitable that time has both stopped and moved with unstoppable speed. At the time of writing, the numbers of people contracting and being hospitalised with COVID-19 seem to be on the rise as the northern hemisphere progresses through winter, and in the south we welcome visitors from all over the globe seeking respite from the cold, as well as from the pandemic. Everyone seems to be craving a return to ‘normal’ that is being characterised with the term ‘the new normal’, while many of us regard normal as being irrelevant, or non-existent, and seek just to live fulfilling and sustainable lives. The articles in this issue seek new and alternative ways of reflecting on children’s lives as we move slowly on from the identification of the global pandemic, with the hope that the schism created offers us hope for doing things differently, to obtain more equitable and just childhoods for all children and their families and communities. In the first article, Chan and Ritchie ask us to participate in ‘Exploring a Tiriti-based superdiversity paradigm within early childhood care and education in Aotearoa New Zealand’. The article uses the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Treaty of Waitangi, on Indigenous rights) to report the findings of their study, which ‘used a process of document analysis to examine early childhood care and education responses to increasing superdiversity in the “bicultural” legislative context of Aotearoa New Zealand’. The authors consider official documents that privilege the settler population’s view of Indigenous and migrant populations, which they deem to be ‘vulnerable’. They then use the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Vertovec’s (2007, 2019) superdiversity approach to explore these representations in an attempt to reconceptualise ways in which the nation’s priority learners might be supported. Next, Merewether interrogates one aspect of Piaget’s original works related to young children’s animism in ‘Enchanted animism: A matter of care’. Piaget maintained that young children can be characterised as being at a stage of ‘primitive thought’ prior to becoming more rational at a later stage. Merewether’s article calls for us to rethink this notion and suggests that ‘children’s animism, or “enchanted animism”’, is a ‘matter of care’, which then enables ‘an ethic of living more responsively and attentively with more-than-human others’. In her article, Merewether maintains that young children’s playful and enchanted animism enables them to experience their lifeworlds, including the more-than-human, in new and dynamic ways, and that adults should be attuned to this new way of thinking. Timmons and Airton also interrogate official documents in their article, ‘Welcoming gender diversity in the early years: Interpreting professional guiding documents for gender-expansive practice’. In this article, the documents pertain to human rights protection across Canada – in particular Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":46773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231153289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231153289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在2023年的第一期,我们发表了六篇文章,一个讨论会和一篇书评,反映了该领域的范围和多样性。这些文章讨论了超多样性和性别多样性,对人类世研究的回顾,超越人类的经验,以及儿童权利。自从我们在2020年进入全球大流行以来,看似矛盾的是,时间既停止了,又以不可阻挡的速度前进。在撰写本文时,随着北半球进入冬季,感染和住院的COVID-19人数似乎在上升,在南半球,我们欢迎来自全球各地的游客寻求缓解寒冷和大流行的机会。每个人似乎都渴望回归“正常”,这被称为“新常态”,而我们中的许多人认为正常是无关紧要的,或者不存在的,而只是寻求充实和可持续的生活。在我们缓慢地摆脱对这一全球流行病的确认之际,本期的文章寻求以新的和替代的方式来反思儿童的生活,希望所造成的分裂给我们带来希望,以不同的方式做事,为所有儿童及其家庭和社区获得更公平和公正的童年。在第一篇文章中,Chan和Ritchie要求我们参与“在新西兰奥特罗阿的早期儿童保育和教育中探索基于tiriti的超多样性范式”。这篇文章以《怀唐伊条约》(The Tiriti o Waitangi Treaty,关于原住民权利的条约)为视角,报告了他们的研究结果,该研究“使用文献分析的过程来检查幼儿保育和教育对新西兰“双文化”立法背景下日益增加的超级多样性的反应”。这组作者认为,官方文件赋予了定居者对土著和移民人口的特权,他们认为土著和移民人口是“脆弱的”。然后,他们使用Te Tiriti o Waitangi和Vertovec(2007年,2019年)的超多样性方法来探索这些表征,试图重新定义支持国家优先学习者的方式。接下来,Merewether在“魔法万物有灵论:一个关心的问题”中询问皮亚杰与幼儿万物有灵论相关的原创作品的一个方面。皮亚杰认为,幼儿在后期变得更加理性之前,可以被描述为处于“原始思维”阶段。Merewether的文章呼吁我们重新思考这一概念,并建议“儿童万物有灵论,或“魔法万物有灵论”,是一种“关心的问题”,它使“一种比人类更积极、更专注地生活的伦理”成为可能。在她的文章中,梅雷韦瑟坚持认为,幼儿的有趣和迷人的万物有灵论使他们能够以新的和充满活力的方式体验他们的生活世界,包括超越人类的世界,成年人应该适应这种新的思维方式。蒂蒙斯和艾顿在他们的文章《早期欢迎性别多样性:解读性别扩张实践的专业指导文件》中也质疑了官方文件。在这篇文章中,文件涉及整个加拿大的人权保护-特别是社论
In the first issue of 2023, we publish six articles, a colloquium and a book review that reflect the range and diversity of the field. The articles consider superdiversity and gender diversity, a review of research regarding the Anthropocene, experiences with the more-than-human, and children’s rights. Since we entered the global pandemic in 2020, it seems paradoxically inevitable that time has both stopped and moved with unstoppable speed. At the time of writing, the numbers of people contracting and being hospitalised with COVID-19 seem to be on the rise as the northern hemisphere progresses through winter, and in the south we welcome visitors from all over the globe seeking respite from the cold, as well as from the pandemic. Everyone seems to be craving a return to ‘normal’ that is being characterised with the term ‘the new normal’, while many of us regard normal as being irrelevant, or non-existent, and seek just to live fulfilling and sustainable lives. The articles in this issue seek new and alternative ways of reflecting on children’s lives as we move slowly on from the identification of the global pandemic, with the hope that the schism created offers us hope for doing things differently, to obtain more equitable and just childhoods for all children and their families and communities. In the first article, Chan and Ritchie ask us to participate in ‘Exploring a Tiriti-based superdiversity paradigm within early childhood care and education in Aotearoa New Zealand’. The article uses the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Treaty of Waitangi, on Indigenous rights) to report the findings of their study, which ‘used a process of document analysis to examine early childhood care and education responses to increasing superdiversity in the “bicultural” legislative context of Aotearoa New Zealand’. The authors consider official documents that privilege the settler population’s view of Indigenous and migrant populations, which they deem to be ‘vulnerable’. They then use the lens of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Vertovec’s (2007, 2019) superdiversity approach to explore these representations in an attempt to reconceptualise ways in which the nation’s priority learners might be supported. Next, Merewether interrogates one aspect of Piaget’s original works related to young children’s animism in ‘Enchanted animism: A matter of care’. Piaget maintained that young children can be characterised as being at a stage of ‘primitive thought’ prior to becoming more rational at a later stage. Merewether’s article calls for us to rethink this notion and suggests that ‘children’s animism, or “enchanted animism”’, is a ‘matter of care’, which then enables ‘an ethic of living more responsively and attentively with more-than-human others’. In her article, Merewether maintains that young children’s playful and enchanted animism enables them to experience their lifeworlds, including the more-than-human, in new and dynamic ways, and that adults should be attuned to this new way of thinking. Timmons and Airton also interrogate official documents in their article, ‘Welcoming gender diversity in the early years: Interpreting professional guiding documents for gender-expansive practice’. In this article, the documents pertain to human rights protection across Canada – in particular Editorial
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood (CIEC) is a peer-reviewed international research journal. The journal provides a forum for researchers and professionals who are exploring new and alternative perspectives in their work with young children (from birth to eight years of age) and their families. CIEC aims to present opportunities for scholars to highlight the ways in which the boundaries of early childhood studies and practice are expanding, and for readers to participate in the discussion of emerging issues, contradictions and possibilities.