内包流程是否有回报?

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Grzegorz Grela, M. Hofman
{"title":"内包流程是否有回报?","authors":"Grzegorz Grela, M. Hofman","doi":"10.1108/JGOSS-06-2020-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine whether insourcing of processes pays off and verifies key hypotheses regarding the financial ratios of organisations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper randomly selects and then surveys 1996 organisations, of which 9.5% (190) stated that they used insourcing, 1.9% (37) made a decision to implement insourcing in the near future and 88.6% did not use insourcing. Then, for available firm data (100 insourcing firms and 100 firms without it), the financial statements of the surveyed companies were obtained to compare the most important financial ratios. The financial situation was compared at four-time points. The mean and median values of individual indicators were compared with the significance of relevant statistical tests.\n\n\nFindings\nA U-shaped curve of financial results in the time of enterprises that implemented insourcing and reverse U-shaped curve for enterprises that did not have insourcing are seen. Thus, the insourcing of processes pays off in the long run.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations exist in the generalisation of the results obtained, due to the limited number of samples qualified for analyses (limited reliable financial data).\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research highlights the importance of effective insourcing projects in the long term.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is the first to quantify the financial performance of companies that have used insourcing in comparison with a reference group. This paper defines insourcing and contributes to the growing number of studies on insourcing by bringing attention to the financial outcomes in the long run.\n","PeriodicalId":43346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does insourcing of processes pay off?\",\"authors\":\"Grzegorz Grela, M. Hofman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JGOSS-06-2020-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to examine whether insourcing of processes pays off and verifies key hypotheses regarding the financial ratios of organisations.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper randomly selects and then surveys 1996 organisations, of which 9.5% (190) stated that they used insourcing, 1.9% (37) made a decision to implement insourcing in the near future and 88.6% did not use insourcing. Then, for available firm data (100 insourcing firms and 100 firms without it), the financial statements of the surveyed companies were obtained to compare the most important financial ratios. The financial situation was compared at four-time points. The mean and median values of individual indicators were compared with the significance of relevant statistical tests.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA U-shaped curve of financial results in the time of enterprises that implemented insourcing and reverse U-shaped curve for enterprises that did not have insourcing are seen. Thus, the insourcing of processes pays off in the long run.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLimitations exist in the generalisation of the results obtained, due to the limited number of samples qualified for analyses (limited reliable financial data).\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe research highlights the importance of effective insourcing projects in the long term.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study is the first to quantify the financial performance of companies that have used insourcing in comparison with a reference group. This paper defines insourcing and contributes to the growing number of studies on insourcing by bringing attention to the financial outcomes in the long run.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-06-2020-0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-06-2020-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究旨在检验过程的内包是否有回报,并验证有关组织财务比率的关键假设。设计/方法/方法本文随机选择并调查了1996家组织,其中9.5%(190)的组织表示他们使用了内包,1.9%(37)的组织决定在不久的将来实施内包,88.6%的组织没有使用内包。然后,对于可用的公司数据(100家内包公司和100家没有内包公司),获得被调查公司的财务报表,以比较最重要的财务比率。对四个时间点的财务状况进行了比较。将各个指标的平均值和中值与相关统计检验的显著性进行比较。发现实施内包的企业财务业绩呈U型曲线,未实施内包企业财务业绩则呈倒U型曲线。因此,从长远来看,流程的内包是有回报的。研究局限性/含义由于可供分析的样本数量有限(可靠的财务数据有限),所获得结果的概括存在局限性。实际含义研究强调了有效的内包项目的长期重要性。独创性/价值这项研究首次将使用内包的公司的财务业绩与参考组进行比较。本文定义了内包,并通过关注长期的财务结果,为越来越多的内包研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does insourcing of processes pay off?
Purpose This study aims to examine whether insourcing of processes pays off and verifies key hypotheses regarding the financial ratios of organisations. Design/methodology/approach This paper randomly selects and then surveys 1996 organisations, of which 9.5% (190) stated that they used insourcing, 1.9% (37) made a decision to implement insourcing in the near future and 88.6% did not use insourcing. Then, for available firm data (100 insourcing firms and 100 firms without it), the financial statements of the surveyed companies were obtained to compare the most important financial ratios. The financial situation was compared at four-time points. The mean and median values of individual indicators were compared with the significance of relevant statistical tests. Findings A U-shaped curve of financial results in the time of enterprises that implemented insourcing and reverse U-shaped curve for enterprises that did not have insourcing are seen. Thus, the insourcing of processes pays off in the long run. Research limitations/implications Limitations exist in the generalisation of the results obtained, due to the limited number of samples qualified for analyses (limited reliable financial data). Practical implications The research highlights the importance of effective insourcing projects in the long term. Originality/value This study is the first to quantify the financial performance of companies that have used insourcing in comparison with a reference group. This paper defines insourcing and contributes to the growing number of studies on insourcing by bringing attention to the financial outcomes in the long run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing aims to foster and lead the international debate on global operations and strategic sourcing. It provides a central, authoritative and independent forum for the critical evaluation and dissemination of research and development, applications, processes and current practices relating to sourcing strategically for products, services, competences and resources on a global scale and to designing, implementing and managing the resulting global operations. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing places a strong emphasis on applied research with relevant implications for both knowledge and practice. Also, the journal aims to facilitate the exchange of ideas and opinions on research projects and issues. As such, on top of a standard section publishing scientific articles, there will be two additional sections: "The Industry ViewPoint": in this section, industrial practitioners from around the world will be invited (max 2 contributions per issue) to present their point of view on a relevant subject area. This is intended to give the journal not just an academic focus, but a practical focus as well. In this way, we intend to reflect a trend that has characterised the past few decades, where interests and initiatives in research, academia and industry have been more and more converging to the point of collaborative relationships being a common practice. "Research Updates - Executive Summaries". In this section, researchers around the world will be given the opportunity to present their research projects in the area of global sourcing and outsourcing by means of an executive summary of their project. This will increase awareness of the on-going research projects in the area and it will attract interest from industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信