战术神话和对现实的认知

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Paul Lushenko, S. Kreps
{"title":"战术神话和对现实的认知","authors":"Paul Lushenko, S. Kreps","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2225783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the United States has built unmanned systems that focus on decreasing political cost and privileging control, precision, and persistence over survivability, mass, and economic cost. But these are all human choices—they are not immutable or even unique characteristics of drones (or even of the narrow segment of drones on which the authors focus). So how would I answer the authors’ opening question: “Do emerging and disruptive technologies yield an offensive advantage?” I would say the puzzle is not in a technological assessment of a few weapons’ capabilities in a snapshot of time, but instead in the complicated interaction of technologies, tactics, and human choices that ultimately determine the winners and losers of war. And for this more complicated puzzle, I would argue that the article, while factually correct, is unscorable at 12.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"574 - 581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tactical Myths and Perceptions of Reality\",\"authors\":\"Paul Lushenko, S. Kreps\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09636412.2023.2225783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the United States has built unmanned systems that focus on decreasing political cost and privileging control, precision, and persistence over survivability, mass, and economic cost. But these are all human choices—they are not immutable or even unique characteristics of drones (or even of the narrow segment of drones on which the authors focus). So how would I answer the authors’ opening question: “Do emerging and disruptive technologies yield an offensive advantage?” I would say the puzzle is not in a technological assessment of a few weapons’ capabilities in a snapshot of time, but instead in the complicated interaction of technologies, tactics, and human choices that ultimately determine the winners and losers of war. And for this more complicated puzzle, I would argue that the article, while factually correct, is unscorable at 12.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Security Studies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"574 - 581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Security Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2225783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2225783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国已经建立了无人驾驶系统,其重点是降低政治成本,并将控制、精度和持久性置于生存能力、质量和经济成本之上。但这些都是人类的选择——它们并不是无人机(甚至是作者关注的一小部分无人机)不变的,甚至不是独特的特征。那么,我该如何回答作者的开场白:“新兴和颠覆性技术是否会产生进攻优势?”我想说,难题不在于对一些武器能力的技术评估,而在于技术、战术和人类选择的复杂互动,这些互动最终决定了战争的赢家和输家。对于这个更复杂的谜题,我认为这篇文章虽然事实上是正确的,但在12岁时是无法保存的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tactical Myths and Perceptions of Reality
the United States has built unmanned systems that focus on decreasing political cost and privileging control, precision, and persistence over survivability, mass, and economic cost. But these are all human choices—they are not immutable or even unique characteristics of drones (or even of the narrow segment of drones on which the authors focus). So how would I answer the authors’ opening question: “Do emerging and disruptive technologies yield an offensive advantage?” I would say the puzzle is not in a technological assessment of a few weapons’ capabilities in a snapshot of time, but instead in the complicated interaction of technologies, tactics, and human choices that ultimately determine the winners and losers of war. And for this more complicated puzzle, I would argue that the article, while factually correct, is unscorable at 12.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Security Studies
Security Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Security Studies publishes innovative scholarly manuscripts that make a significant contribution – whether theoretical, empirical, or both – to our understanding of international security. Studies that do not emphasize the causes and consequences of war or the sources and conditions of peace fall outside the journal’s domain. Security Studies features articles that develop, test, and debate theories of international security – that is, articles that address an important research question, display innovation in research, contribute in a novel way to a body of knowledge, and (as appropriate) demonstrate theoretical development with state-of-the art use of appropriate methodological tools. While we encourage authors to discuss the policy implications of their work, articles that are primarily policy-oriented do not fit the journal’s mission. The journal publishes articles that challenge the conventional wisdom in the area of international security studies. Security Studies includes a wide range of topics ranging from nuclear proliferation and deterrence, civil-military relations, strategic culture, ethnic conflicts and their resolution, epidemics and national security, democracy and foreign-policy decision making, developments in qualitative and multi-method research, and the future of security studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信