{"title":"尼泊尔立法机构中公民平等代表权问题:言论与现实","authors":"Ganesh Prasad Pandeya, T. Oyama","doi":"10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To what extent the legislature represents the views of all social groups is a central question in multiethnic societies like Nepal. The results from descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of all representatives from 1959 to 2013 show the existence of a prolonged unequal representation of caste/ethnic groups in the legislature of Nepal. A few subgroups of peoples have historically created a ‘creamy layer’ throughout all political systems. Although women and some excluded identities have gained substantial seats in the later period, progress for many groups, particularly historically marginalized ones, has been far too slow. The representation patterns are largely associated with a design of political institutions, such as electoral system and ethnic quotas, as well as the socioeconomic status of a group linked to poverty, wealth, adult literacy, and human development. These findings suggest that the chances of equal representation appear not just to the worth of group effort rather than its ability to influence the political process through power and resources. Thus, reforming political institutions, particularly the electoral systems, and improving the socioeconomic status of women and excluded identities, all of which demand strong political will and commitment, may narrow down inequality in political representation.","PeriodicalId":44333,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Political Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"45 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The question of equal representation of citizens in the legislature of Nepal: rhetoric and reality\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Prasad Pandeya, T. Oyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To what extent the legislature represents the views of all social groups is a central question in multiethnic societies like Nepal. The results from descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of all representatives from 1959 to 2013 show the existence of a prolonged unequal representation of caste/ethnic groups in the legislature of Nepal. A few subgroups of peoples have historically created a ‘creamy layer’ throughout all political systems. Although women and some excluded identities have gained substantial seats in the later period, progress for many groups, particularly historically marginalized ones, has been far too slow. The representation patterns are largely associated with a design of political institutions, such as electoral system and ethnic quotas, as well as the socioeconomic status of a group linked to poverty, wealth, adult literacy, and human development. These findings suggest that the chances of equal representation appear not just to the worth of group effort rather than its ability to influence the political process through power and resources. Thus, reforming political institutions, particularly the electoral systems, and improving the socioeconomic status of women and excluded identities, all of which demand strong political will and commitment, may narrow down inequality in political representation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1570471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The question of equal representation of citizens in the legislature of Nepal: rhetoric and reality
ABSTRACT To what extent the legislature represents the views of all social groups is a central question in multiethnic societies like Nepal. The results from descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of all representatives from 1959 to 2013 show the existence of a prolonged unequal representation of caste/ethnic groups in the legislature of Nepal. A few subgroups of peoples have historically created a ‘creamy layer’ throughout all political systems. Although women and some excluded identities have gained substantial seats in the later period, progress for many groups, particularly historically marginalized ones, has been far too slow. The representation patterns are largely associated with a design of political institutions, such as electoral system and ethnic quotas, as well as the socioeconomic status of a group linked to poverty, wealth, adult literacy, and human development. These findings suggest that the chances of equal representation appear not just to the worth of group effort rather than its ability to influence the political process through power and resources. Thus, reforming political institutions, particularly the electoral systems, and improving the socioeconomic status of women and excluded identities, all of which demand strong political will and commitment, may narrow down inequality in political representation.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Political Science ( AJPS) is an international refereed journal affiliated to the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Published since 1993, AJPS is a leading journal on Asian politics and governance. It publishes high-quality original articles in major areas of political science, including comparative politics, political thought, international relations, public policy, and public administration, with specific reference to Asian regions and countries. AJPS aims to address some of the most contemporary political and administrative issues in Asia (especially in East, South, and Southeast Asia) at the local, national, and global levels. The journal can be of great value to academic experts, researchers, and students in the above areas of political science as well as to practical policy makers, state institutions, and international agencies.