宽容与不宽容:文化意义与话语用法

IF 1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Verkuyten, Rachel Kollar
{"title":"宽容与不宽容:文化意义与话语用法","authors":"M. Verkuyten, Rachel Kollar","doi":"10.1177/1354067X20984356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of tolerance is widely embraced across many settings and is generally considered critical for the peaceful functioning of culturally diverse societies. However, the concepts of tolerance and intolerance have various meanings and can be used in different ways and for different purposes. The various understandings raise different empirical questions and might have different implications for the subject positions of those who are tolerant and those who are tolerated. In this study, we focus on cultural understandings of tolerance and intolerance and how these terms are used in discourses. We first describe how in an open-ended question in a national survey lay people use a classical and a more modern understanding of tolerance to describe situations of tolerance and intolerance. Second, we analyze how those who tolerate and those who are tolerated can flexibly use these different understandings of (in)tolerance for discursively making particular “us–them” distinctions. It is concluded that the notions of tolerance and intolerance have different cultural meanings which both can be used for progressive or oppressive ends.","PeriodicalId":47241,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"172 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1354067X20984356","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerance and intolerance: Cultural meanings and discursive usage\",\"authors\":\"M. Verkuyten, Rachel Kollar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1354067X20984356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of tolerance is widely embraced across many settings and is generally considered critical for the peaceful functioning of culturally diverse societies. However, the concepts of tolerance and intolerance have various meanings and can be used in different ways and for different purposes. The various understandings raise different empirical questions and might have different implications for the subject positions of those who are tolerant and those who are tolerated. In this study, we focus on cultural understandings of tolerance and intolerance and how these terms are used in discourses. We first describe how in an open-ended question in a national survey lay people use a classical and a more modern understanding of tolerance to describe situations of tolerance and intolerance. Second, we analyze how those who tolerate and those who are tolerated can flexibly use these different understandings of (in)tolerance for discursively making particular “us–them” distinctions. It is concluded that the notions of tolerance and intolerance have different cultural meanings which both can be used for progressive or oppressive ends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1354067X20984356\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20984356\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20984356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

宽容的概念在许多环境中被广泛接受,通常被认为对文化多样性社会的和平运作至关重要。然而,容忍和不容忍的概念具有不同的含义,可以以不同的方式和目的使用。不同的理解提出了不同的经验问题,并可能对宽容者和被宽容者的主体立场产生不同的影响。在这项研究中,我们重点关注宽容和不容忍的文化理解,以及这些术语在话语中的使用方式。我们首先描述了在一项全国性调查中的一个开放式问题中,人们如何使用对宽容的经典和更现代的理解来描述宽容和不容忍的情况。其次,我们分析了那些宽容的人和那些被宽容的人如何灵活地利用这些对宽容的不同理解来进行特定的“我们-他们”区分。结论是,容忍和不容忍的概念具有不同的文化含义,两者都可以用于进步或压迫目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tolerance and intolerance: Cultural meanings and discursive usage
The notion of tolerance is widely embraced across many settings and is generally considered critical for the peaceful functioning of culturally diverse societies. However, the concepts of tolerance and intolerance have various meanings and can be used in different ways and for different purposes. The various understandings raise different empirical questions and might have different implications for the subject positions of those who are tolerant and those who are tolerated. In this study, we focus on cultural understandings of tolerance and intolerance and how these terms are used in discourses. We first describe how in an open-ended question in a national survey lay people use a classical and a more modern understanding of tolerance to describe situations of tolerance and intolerance. Second, we analyze how those who tolerate and those who are tolerated can flexibly use these different understandings of (in)tolerance for discursively making particular “us–them” distinctions. It is concluded that the notions of tolerance and intolerance have different cultural meanings which both can be used for progressive or oppressive ends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Culture & Psychology
Culture & Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Culture & Psychology addresses the centrality of culture necessary for a basic understanding of the psychology of human beings: their identity, social conduct, intra- and intersubjective experiences, emotions and semiotic creativity. By drawing on diverse theoretical backgrounds, the editorial aim is to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly investigations and discussions that will advance our basic knowledge of the self in its historical and cultural contexts. The orientation of the journal is towards formulating new conceptualizations of culture in psychology, together with theoretically relevant empirical investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信