应对传染病威胁的适当治理：发展工作假设
IF 1.9
Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
引用次数: 35
摘要
在当今相互关联的世界中，传染病仍然是对公共健康的威胁。目前正在就如何最好地协调应对传染病威胁进行辩论，该领域在理解哪种具体的结构性治理安排将发挥最佳作用方面仍处于萌芽状态。本文通过证明有可能制定工作假设，具体说明传染病危机的类型和应对危机的类型之间的关系，从而为这一讨论做出贡献。对于危机类型和应对机制类型，仍然缺乏研究，但将这两者结合起来的假设为未来的研究和行动议程提供了一个视角。这无疑阻止了我们在应对危机时在分裂和炒作之间做出选择。它提供了工具，使人们认识到，没有哪种类型的反应是最有效的，也不是所有的反应在具体情况下都同样有效。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats: Developing Working Hypotheses
Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍：
Scholarship on risk, hazards, and crises (emergencies, disasters, or public policy/organizational crises) has developed into mature and distinct fields of inquiry. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (RHCPP) addresses the governance implications of the important questions raised for the respective fields. The relationships between risk, hazards, and crisis raise fundamental questions with broad social science and policy implications. During unstable situations of acute or chronic danger and substantial uncertainty (i.e. a crisis), important and deeply rooted societal institutions, norms, and values come into play. The purpose of RHCPP is to provide a forum for research and commentary that examines societies’ understanding of and measures to address risk,hazards, and crises, how public policies do and should address these concerns, and to what effect. The journal is explicitly designed to encourage a broad range of perspectives by integrating work from a variety of disciplines. The journal will look at social science theory and policy design across the spectrum of risks and crises — including natural and technological hazards, public health crises, terrorism, and societal and environmental disasters. Papers will analyze the ways societies deal with both unpredictable and predictable events as public policy questions, which include topics such as crisis governance, loss and liability, emergency response, agenda setting, and the social and cultural contexts in which hazards, risks and crises are perceived and defined. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy invites dialogue and is open to new approaches. We seek scholarly work that combines academic quality with practical relevance. We especially welcome authors writing on the governance of risk and crises to submit their manuscripts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
