{"title":"含硫天然水体中零价硫的活性","authors":"George R Helz","doi":"10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ionic and molecular carriers of dissolved (filter-passing) zero-valent sulfur (S<sup>0</sup>) in anaerobic natural waters include polysulfides, S<sub>n</sub><sup>2?</sup>, molecular S<sub>8</sub>(aq), organic macromolecules and certain higher valent thioanions. Because S<sup>0</sup> is rapidly transferred among these various carriers, its biogeochemical roles in such processes as dehalogenation of organic compounds, chelation of trace metals, and anaerobic microbial metabolism are not determined solely by one ionic or molecular species. Here, S<sup>0</sup> is treated collectively as a virtual thermodynamic component, and computational as well as graphical methods for quantifying its activity (a<sub>S</sub>0) in natural waters are presented. From a<sub>S</sub>0, concentrations of the ionic and molecular carriers of S<sup>0</sup> can be calculated easily.</p><p>Concentration ratios of any two polysulfide ions define a<sub>S</sub>0 (Method I). Unfortunately these concentrations are often too low in nature for accurate quantification with current methods. Measurements of total divalent sulfur (ΣS<sup>-II</sup>), zero-valent sulfur (ΣS<sup>0</sup>) and pH provide a more widely applicable approach (Method II). Systematic errors in ΣS<sup>0</sup> measurements are the main limit to accuracy of this method at the present time. Alternative methods based on greigite solubility and potentiometry are discussed. A critical comparison of Methods I and II reveals inconsistencies at low ΣS<sup>0</sup>/ΣS<sup>-II</sup> that imply errors in the thermodynamic data for HS<sub>2</sub><sup>?</sup> and S<sub>2</sub><sup>?</sup>. For samples having low ΣS<sup>0</sup>/ΣS<sup>-II</sup>, an interim remedy is recommended: letting pK<sub>a2</sub>?=?6.3 for all HS<sub>n</sub><sup>?</sup> ions.</p><p>Newly assembled data for a<sub>S</sub>0 in a selection of anaerobic natural waters indicate that S<sup>0</sup> is always metastable in the surveyed samples with respect to disproportionation to sulfide and sulfate. In all the surveyed environments, sulfur-rich minerals, such as greigite, covellite and orpiment, are stable in preference to their sulfur-poor cohorts, mackinawite, chalcocite and realgar. The a<sub>S</sub>0 values in the dataset span conditions favoring Hg-polysulfide complexes vs. Hg-sulfide complexes, implying that a<sub>S</sub>0 could affect Hg-methylation rates in nature. No support is found for the common assumption that a<sub>S</sub>0?=?1 in reducing natural waters. This paper calls attention to an urgent need for improved measurement methods, especially for total zero-valent sulfur, as well as new determinations of ionization constants for all HS<sub>n</sub><sup>?</sup> species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12694,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Transactions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity of zero-valent sulfur in sulfidic natural waters\",\"authors\":\"George R Helz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ionic and molecular carriers of dissolved (filter-passing) zero-valent sulfur (S<sup>0</sup>) in anaerobic natural waters include polysulfides, S<sub>n</sub><sup>2?</sup>, molecular S<sub>8</sub>(aq), organic macromolecules and certain higher valent thioanions. Because S<sup>0</sup> is rapidly transferred among these various carriers, its biogeochemical roles in such processes as dehalogenation of organic compounds, chelation of trace metals, and anaerobic microbial metabolism are not determined solely by one ionic or molecular species. Here, S<sup>0</sup> is treated collectively as a virtual thermodynamic component, and computational as well as graphical methods for quantifying its activity (a<sub>S</sub>0) in natural waters are presented. From a<sub>S</sub>0, concentrations of the ionic and molecular carriers of S<sup>0</sup> can be calculated easily.</p><p>Concentration ratios of any two polysulfide ions define a<sub>S</sub>0 (Method I). Unfortunately these concentrations are often too low in nature for accurate quantification with current methods. Measurements of total divalent sulfur (ΣS<sup>-II</sup>), zero-valent sulfur (ΣS<sup>0</sup>) and pH provide a more widely applicable approach (Method II). Systematic errors in ΣS<sup>0</sup> measurements are the main limit to accuracy of this method at the present time. Alternative methods based on greigite solubility and potentiometry are discussed. A critical comparison of Methods I and II reveals inconsistencies at low ΣS<sup>0</sup>/ΣS<sup>-II</sup> that imply errors in the thermodynamic data for HS<sub>2</sub><sup>?</sup> and S<sub>2</sub><sup>?</sup>. For samples having low ΣS<sup>0</sup>/ΣS<sup>-II</sup>, an interim remedy is recommended: letting pK<sub>a2</sub>?=?6.3 for all HS<sub>n</sub><sup>?</sup> ions.</p><p>Newly assembled data for a<sub>S</sub>0 in a selection of anaerobic natural waters indicate that S<sup>0</sup> is always metastable in the surveyed samples with respect to disproportionation to sulfide and sulfate. In all the surveyed environments, sulfur-rich minerals, such as greigite, covellite and orpiment, are stable in preference to their sulfur-poor cohorts, mackinawite, chalcocite and realgar. The a<sub>S</sub>0 values in the dataset span conditions favoring Hg-polysulfide complexes vs. Hg-sulfide complexes, implying that a<sub>S</sub>0 could affect Hg-methylation rates in nature. No support is found for the common assumption that a<sub>S</sub>0?=?1 in reducing natural waters. This paper calls attention to an urgent need for improved measurement methods, especially for total zero-valent sulfur, as well as new determinations of ionization constants for all HS<sub>n</sub><sup>?</sup> species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemical Transactions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemical Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12932-014-0013-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Activity of zero-valent sulfur in sulfidic natural waters
Ionic and molecular carriers of dissolved (filter-passing) zero-valent sulfur (S0) in anaerobic natural waters include polysulfides, Sn2?, molecular S8(aq), organic macromolecules and certain higher valent thioanions. Because S0 is rapidly transferred among these various carriers, its biogeochemical roles in such processes as dehalogenation of organic compounds, chelation of trace metals, and anaerobic microbial metabolism are not determined solely by one ionic or molecular species. Here, S0 is treated collectively as a virtual thermodynamic component, and computational as well as graphical methods for quantifying its activity (aS0) in natural waters are presented. From aS0, concentrations of the ionic and molecular carriers of S0 can be calculated easily.
Concentration ratios of any two polysulfide ions define aS0 (Method I). Unfortunately these concentrations are often too low in nature for accurate quantification with current methods. Measurements of total divalent sulfur (ΣS-II), zero-valent sulfur (ΣS0) and pH provide a more widely applicable approach (Method II). Systematic errors in ΣS0 measurements are the main limit to accuracy of this method at the present time. Alternative methods based on greigite solubility and potentiometry are discussed. A critical comparison of Methods I and II reveals inconsistencies at low ΣS0/ΣS-II that imply errors in the thermodynamic data for HS2? and S2?. For samples having low ΣS0/ΣS-II, an interim remedy is recommended: letting pKa2?=?6.3 for all HSn? ions.
Newly assembled data for aS0 in a selection of anaerobic natural waters indicate that S0 is always metastable in the surveyed samples with respect to disproportionation to sulfide and sulfate. In all the surveyed environments, sulfur-rich minerals, such as greigite, covellite and orpiment, are stable in preference to their sulfur-poor cohorts, mackinawite, chalcocite and realgar. The aS0 values in the dataset span conditions favoring Hg-polysulfide complexes vs. Hg-sulfide complexes, implying that aS0 could affect Hg-methylation rates in nature. No support is found for the common assumption that aS0?=?1 in reducing natural waters. This paper calls attention to an urgent need for improved measurement methods, especially for total zero-valent sulfur, as well as new determinations of ionization constants for all HSn? species.
期刊介绍:
Geochemical Transactions publishes high-quality research in all areas of chemistry as it relates to materials and processes occurring in terrestrial and extraterrestrial systems.