社区科学知情的地方政策:Pinole Creek垃圾评估案例研究

Win Cowger, Itzel Gomez, Norma Martinez-Rubin, Ann Moriarty, Todd Harwell, Lisa Anich
{"title":"社区科学知情的地方政策:Pinole Creek垃圾评估案例研究","authors":"Win Cowger,&nbsp;Itzel Gomez,&nbsp;Norma Martinez-Rubin,&nbsp;Ann Moriarty,&nbsp;Todd Harwell,&nbsp;Lisa Anich","doi":"10.1029/2022CSJ000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for the community. The key scientific questions were: how much trash was in the creek at the time of the study, what types of trash were most abundant, and where should the community be most concerned about trash in the creek? The team enlisted additional community volunteers at local events. A randomized sampling design and a community science-adapted version of The San Francisco Estuary Institute's Trash Monitoring Playbook was used to survey the trash in the creek. The Thriving Earth Team estimated there were 37 m<sup>3</sup> and 47,820 pieces of total trash in the creek channel with an average concentration of 2 m<sup>3</sup> per km and 2,697 pieces per km. The community gained an understanding of the scale of the problem. Plastic and single-use trash were most abundant, and the community members expressed high concern about plastic single-use food packaging and tobacco-related waste. The community identified locations in the creek where trash was abundant and prioritized follow-up study locations. Seven new recommendations were presented to the Pinole City Council. The City Council unanimously voted to further discuss ordinance-related recommendations. And that was when community science contributed to local policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2022CSJ000017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Science-Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Win Cowger,&nbsp;Itzel Gomez,&nbsp;Norma Martinez-Rubin,&nbsp;Ann Moriarty,&nbsp;Todd Harwell,&nbsp;Lisa Anich\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2022CSJ000017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for the community. The key scientific questions were: how much trash was in the creek at the time of the study, what types of trash were most abundant, and where should the community be most concerned about trash in the creek? The team enlisted additional community volunteers at local events. A randomized sampling design and a community science-adapted version of The San Francisco Estuary Institute's Trash Monitoring Playbook was used to survey the trash in the creek. The Thriving Earth Team estimated there were 37 m<sup>3</sup> and 47,820 pieces of total trash in the creek channel with an average concentration of 2 m<sup>3</sup> per km and 2,697 pieces per km. The community gained an understanding of the scale of the problem. Plastic and single-use trash were most abundant, and the community members expressed high concern about plastic single-use food packaging and tobacco-related waste. The community identified locations in the creek where trash was abundant and prioritized follow-up study locations. Seven new recommendations were presented to the Pinole City Council. The City Council unanimously voted to further discuss ordinance-related recommendations. And that was when community science contributed to local policy development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community science\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2022CSJ000017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022CSJ000017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022CSJ000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年秋天,在当地一家商店喝咖啡时,三个利益相关者,丽莎·阿尼奇(康特拉科斯塔资源保护区流域经理)、诺玛·马丁-鲁宾(社区成员和皮诺尔委员会成员)和安·莫里亚蒂(皮诺尔溪流域之友董事会成员),会面讨论了他们如何共同努力,解决一系列持续存在的问题:皮诺尔溪的垃圾和不统一的地方行动。上述成员加上Itzel Gomez(地球团队)被称为“核心社区团队”(图1)。当提到“社区”时,它指的是核心社区团队及其在Pinole中的网络和合作伙伴。核心社区团队由具有环保意识和公民意识的志愿者组成,他们看到了使用标准化方法调查小溪垃圾的价值,这种方法对其他人来说是可以辩护的。该组织决定向繁荣地球交流中心提交一份提案,以寻求方向上的支持和帮助。繁荣地球交流(TEX)是美国地球物理联合会(AGU)的一项倡议和计划,致力于将社区、科学家、合作伙伴和利益相关者联合起来,参与社区科学进程,解决与自然灾害、自然资源和气候变化有关的社区层面问题。该小组将他们的项目正式命名为“繁荣地球团队”(包括本手稿的所有作者),标题为“参与社区保护皮诺尔河流域:评估垃圾影响以促进繁荣的生态系统”。加州是少数几个积极管理河流垃圾的州之一。美国加州皮诺尔的几个社区团体合作开展了一个“繁荣地球交流”社区科学项目。其目的是评估皮诺尔溪的垃圾,并为社区确定政策发展机会。关键的科学问题是:在研究时,小溪里有多少垃圾,什么类型的垃圾最丰富,社区应该最关心小溪里的垃圾在哪里?该团队在当地活动中招募了更多的社区志愿者。采用随机抽样设计和旧金山河口研究所垃圾监测手册的社区科学改编版本来调查小溪中的垃圾。“繁荣地球”小组估计,河道内的垃圾总量分别为37立方米和47,820件,平均浓度为每公里2立方米和每公里2,697件。社区逐渐认识到问题的严重性。塑料和一次性垃圾最多,社区成员对塑料一次性食品包装和烟草相关垃圾表示高度关注。社区确定了小溪中垃圾丰富的地点,并确定了后续研究的优先地点。皮诺尔市议会收到了七项新的建议。市议会一致投票决定进一步讨论与条例有关的建议。那时,社区科学为当地政策的制定做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Community Science-Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment

Community Science-Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment

California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for the community. The key scientific questions were: how much trash was in the creek at the time of the study, what types of trash were most abundant, and where should the community be most concerned about trash in the creek? The team enlisted additional community volunteers at local events. A randomized sampling design and a community science-adapted version of The San Francisco Estuary Institute's Trash Monitoring Playbook was used to survey the trash in the creek. The Thriving Earth Team estimated there were 37 m3 and 47,820 pieces of total trash in the creek channel with an average concentration of 2 m3 per km and 2,697 pieces per km. The community gained an understanding of the scale of the problem. Plastic and single-use trash were most abundant, and the community members expressed high concern about plastic single-use food packaging and tobacco-related waste. The community identified locations in the creek where trash was abundant and prioritized follow-up study locations. Seven new recommendations were presented to the Pinole City Council. The City Council unanimously voted to further discuss ordinance-related recommendations. And that was when community science contributed to local policy development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信