{"title":"概念游戏世界条件下想象力在早期科学教育中的作用","authors":"Marilyn Fleer","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scientists imagine when thinking scientifically, often conceptualised as thought experiments (Albert Einstein), reconciling both the study of the universe and the molecular world (Stephen Hawking) or when engaging with complex ideas, such as in genetics when imagining going down a microscope to study genes (Barbara McClintock). These imaginings are important in science. But does imagination matter in science education? What is the role of imagination in science education in the early years of school? To answer this question, we undertook a cultural-historical study of 18 children (5.6–7.4yers mean 6.4) and 4 teachers who participated in an educational experiment of a Conceptual PlayWorld over 11 weeks. A total of 34.2 h of digital video data were recorded. The results show how imagination was brought to bear on the scientific problem of the relations between the earth, moon, and Sun. The complex science being imagined by children and teachers brought forward imaginary moments and situations as embodied actions, socially engineered affective imagining, common play problems for motivated conditions for science learning, and the need for creating tangible pivots. These conditions developed different expression of imagination: affective imagining, embodied imagining, amplified imagining, and collective imagining. We argue that complexity in science under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld develops different forms of imagining, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of imagination in science education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of imagination in science education in the early years under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Fleer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scientists imagine when thinking scientifically, often conceptualised as thought experiments (Albert Einstein), reconciling both the study of the universe and the molecular world (Stephen Hawking) or when engaging with complex ideas, such as in genetics when imagining going down a microscope to study genes (Barbara McClintock). These imaginings are important in science. But does imagination matter in science education? What is the role of imagination in science education in the early years of school? To answer this question, we undertook a cultural-historical study of 18 children (5.6–7.4yers mean 6.4) and 4 teachers who participated in an educational experiment of a Conceptual PlayWorld over 11 weeks. A total of 34.2 h of digital video data were recorded. The results show how imagination was brought to bear on the scientific problem of the relations between the earth, moon, and Sun. The complex science being imagined by children and teachers brought forward imaginary moments and situations as embodied actions, socially engineered affective imagining, common play problems for motivated conditions for science learning, and the need for creating tangible pivots. These conditions developed different expression of imagination: affective imagining, embodied imagining, amplified imagining, and collective imagining. We argue that complexity in science under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld develops different forms of imagining, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of imagination in science education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of imagination in science education in the early years under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld
Scientists imagine when thinking scientifically, often conceptualised as thought experiments (Albert Einstein), reconciling both the study of the universe and the molecular world (Stephen Hawking) or when engaging with complex ideas, such as in genetics when imagining going down a microscope to study genes (Barbara McClintock). These imaginings are important in science. But does imagination matter in science education? What is the role of imagination in science education in the early years of school? To answer this question, we undertook a cultural-historical study of 18 children (5.6–7.4yers mean 6.4) and 4 teachers who participated in an educational experiment of a Conceptual PlayWorld over 11 weeks. A total of 34.2 h of digital video data were recorded. The results show how imagination was brought to bear on the scientific problem of the relations between the earth, moon, and Sun. The complex science being imagined by children and teachers brought forward imaginary moments and situations as embodied actions, socially engineered affective imagining, common play problems for motivated conditions for science learning, and the need for creating tangible pivots. These conditions developed different expression of imagination: affective imagining, embodied imagining, amplified imagining, and collective imagining. We argue that complexity in science under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld develops different forms of imagining, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of imagination in science education.