Seongmin Kim, K. Min, Sanghoon Lee, J. Hong, J. Song, Jae Kwan Lee, N. Lee
{"title":"交界性卵巢肿瘤患者行卵巢囊肿切除术可行吗?回顾性研究和文献综述","authors":"Seongmin Kim, K. Min, Sanghoon Lee, J. Hong, J. Song, Jae Kwan Lee, N. Lee","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog4902051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Given that borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are usually found in young, fertile women without a history of childbirth, fertility preservation should be considered in the treatment plan. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of ovarian cystectomy in patients with BOTs. Methods: Patients with BOTs treated between August 2007 and August 2016 at our institution were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery: the cystectomy group and the oophorectomy group with or without salpingectomy, and differences in surgical outcomes were compared. The cumulative disease recurrence was also compared using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Of the 162 patients enrolled, 128 (79.0%) underwent an oophorectomy with or without salpingectomy and 34 (21.0%) underwent an ovarian cystectomy. The patients in the cystectomy group were younger than those in the oophorectomy group (29.2 years vs. 46.5 years, p< 0.001), and the proportion of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was higher in the cystectomy group than in the oophorectomy group (88.2% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). During the mean follow-up period of 44 months, six patients (3.70%) developed disease recurrence (five [3.9%] and one [2.9%] in the oophorectomy and cystectomy groups, respectively). The two-year disease-free survival rate was 97.1% and 97.6% in the cystectomy and oophorectomy groups, respectively, and did not differ between the groups (p = 0.818). Discussion: Ovarian cystectomy can be considered a safe and effective option for young women with BOTs who wish to preserve their fertility.","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is ovarian cystectomy feasible for patients with borderline ovarian tumors? A retrospective study and review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Seongmin Kim, K. Min, Sanghoon Lee, J. Hong, J. Song, Jae Kwan Lee, N. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.ceog4902051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Given that borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are usually found in young, fertile women without a history of childbirth, fertility preservation should be considered in the treatment plan. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of ovarian cystectomy in patients with BOTs. Methods: Patients with BOTs treated between August 2007 and August 2016 at our institution were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery: the cystectomy group and the oophorectomy group with or without salpingectomy, and differences in surgical outcomes were compared. The cumulative disease recurrence was also compared using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Of the 162 patients enrolled, 128 (79.0%) underwent an oophorectomy with or without salpingectomy and 34 (21.0%) underwent an ovarian cystectomy. The patients in the cystectomy group were younger than those in the oophorectomy group (29.2 years vs. 46.5 years, p< 0.001), and the proportion of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was higher in the cystectomy group than in the oophorectomy group (88.2% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). During the mean follow-up period of 44 months, six patients (3.70%) developed disease recurrence (five [3.9%] and one [2.9%] in the oophorectomy and cystectomy groups, respectively). The two-year disease-free survival rate was 97.1% and 97.6% in the cystectomy and oophorectomy groups, respectively, and did not differ between the groups (p = 0.818). Discussion: Ovarian cystectomy can be considered a safe and effective option for young women with BOTs who wish to preserve their fertility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4902051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4902051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is ovarian cystectomy feasible for patients with borderline ovarian tumors? A retrospective study and review of the literature
Background: Given that borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are usually found in young, fertile women without a history of childbirth, fertility preservation should be considered in the treatment plan. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of ovarian cystectomy in patients with BOTs. Methods: Patients with BOTs treated between August 2007 and August 2016 at our institution were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery: the cystectomy group and the oophorectomy group with or without salpingectomy, and differences in surgical outcomes were compared. The cumulative disease recurrence was also compared using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Of the 162 patients enrolled, 128 (79.0%) underwent an oophorectomy with or without salpingectomy and 34 (21.0%) underwent an ovarian cystectomy. The patients in the cystectomy group were younger than those in the oophorectomy group (29.2 years vs. 46.5 years, p< 0.001), and the proportion of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was higher in the cystectomy group than in the oophorectomy group (88.2% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). During the mean follow-up period of 44 months, six patients (3.70%) developed disease recurrence (five [3.9%] and one [2.9%] in the oophorectomy and cystectomy groups, respectively). The two-year disease-free survival rate was 97.1% and 97.6% in the cystectomy and oophorectomy groups, respectively, and did not differ between the groups (p = 0.818). Discussion: Ovarian cystectomy can be considered a safe and effective option for young women with BOTs who wish to preserve their fertility.
期刊介绍:
CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.