{"title":"编者按","authors":"Yonjoo Cho","doi":"10.1177/15344843221131713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Suk-Nam Yun (1939–), a leading female artist in Korea, integrates painting, clothing, rubbish, silk-screens, and planks of wood to create installations representing such familiar motifs as family and mother. She often depicts women who have suffered and persevered under the patriarchal conditions of Korean society, a patriarchy that has deprived women of social recognition. Yun attempts to challenge these conventions by recreating images of women as strong historic icons, in much the same way that Escobar Marisol (1930–) approached her subjects in the 1960s. In their choice of materials and subject matter, the similarity is clearly visible. However, Yun’s work is more than simply a copy of her Western counterpart; it is infused with a spirit that is uniquely Korean.Nonetheless, her art’s formal and conceptual ‘closeness’ lends itself to a poststructuralist analysis, thereby revealing layers of desire, resistance, and ambiguity. This article explores Yun’s Mother series using Homi Bhabha’s notion of ‘mimicry’ theory in order to demonstrate how her work reveals the disruption and discrepancy between the Korean subject and the “other.” In other words, in her work, we can detect a desire to participate in a discourse with her Western counterparts. Yet strongly rooted in her identity as a Korean subject, Yun expresses a desire to transform and even resist those same conventions.","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Note\",\"authors\":\"Yonjoo Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15344843221131713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Suk-Nam Yun (1939–), a leading female artist in Korea, integrates painting, clothing, rubbish, silk-screens, and planks of wood to create installations representing such familiar motifs as family and mother. She often depicts women who have suffered and persevered under the patriarchal conditions of Korean society, a patriarchy that has deprived women of social recognition. Yun attempts to challenge these conventions by recreating images of women as strong historic icons, in much the same way that Escobar Marisol (1930–) approached her subjects in the 1960s. In their choice of materials and subject matter, the similarity is clearly visible. However, Yun’s work is more than simply a copy of her Western counterpart; it is infused with a spirit that is uniquely Korean.Nonetheless, her art’s formal and conceptual ‘closeness’ lends itself to a poststructuralist analysis, thereby revealing layers of desire, resistance, and ambiguity. This article explores Yun’s Mother series using Homi Bhabha’s notion of ‘mimicry’ theory in order to demonstrate how her work reveals the disruption and discrepancy between the Korean subject and the “other.” In other words, in her work, we can detect a desire to participate in a discourse with her Western counterparts. Yet strongly rooted in her identity as a Korean subject, Yun expresses a desire to transform and even resist those same conventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221131713\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221131713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:Suk-Nam Yun (1939–), a leading female artist in Korea, integrates painting, clothing, rubbish, silk-screens, and planks of wood to create installations representing such familiar motifs as family and mother. She often depicts women who have suffered and persevered under the patriarchal conditions of Korean society, a patriarchy that has deprived women of social recognition. Yun attempts to challenge these conventions by recreating images of women as strong historic icons, in much the same way that Escobar Marisol (1930–) approached her subjects in the 1960s. In their choice of materials and subject matter, the similarity is clearly visible. However, Yun’s work is more than simply a copy of her Western counterpart; it is infused with a spirit that is uniquely Korean.Nonetheless, her art’s formal and conceptual ‘closeness’ lends itself to a poststructuralist analysis, thereby revealing layers of desire, resistance, and ambiguity. This article explores Yun’s Mother series using Homi Bhabha’s notion of ‘mimicry’ theory in order to demonstrate how her work reveals the disruption and discrepancy between the Korean subject and the “other.” In other words, in her work, we can detect a desire to participate in a discourse with her Western counterparts. Yet strongly rooted in her identity as a Korean subject, Yun expresses a desire to transform and even resist those same conventions.
期刊介绍:
As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.