联邦制与城市至上:影响澳大利亚城乡分化的政治维度

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
George Wilkinson, Fiona M. Haslam Mckenzie, J. Bolleter
{"title":"联邦制与城市至上:影响澳大利亚城乡分化的政治维度","authors":"George Wilkinson, Fiona M. Haslam Mckenzie, J. Bolleter","doi":"10.1080/12265934.2021.1997631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With Australia’s population set to triple in the twenty-first century, its federal government is investing in decentralization. This is because Australian states exhibit high urban primacy, where one city is dominantly large. Institutional perspectives of primacy suggest political factors are usually significant drivers. For example, strong localism and decentralized settlement patterns are usually concomitant whilst the same can be said of centralized governance and primacy. It is unclear how institutions might influence primacy in Australia’s large states. To better understand, we contextualize Australian federalism within the primacy debate. Using eighteen measures of intergovernmental power, we determined that the Australian federation is comprised of comparably strong federal and state tiers, underlaid by weak local and regional government. The results suggest primacy in Australian states is reinforced by institutions, contrasting the universality of environmental determinism and suggesting an opportunity to decentralize Australia’s growing population through the devolution of decision making powers.","PeriodicalId":46464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"438 - 462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federalism and urban primacy: political dimensions that influence the city–country divide in Australia\",\"authors\":\"George Wilkinson, Fiona M. Haslam Mckenzie, J. Bolleter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12265934.2021.1997631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With Australia’s population set to triple in the twenty-first century, its federal government is investing in decentralization. This is because Australian states exhibit high urban primacy, where one city is dominantly large. Institutional perspectives of primacy suggest political factors are usually significant drivers. For example, strong localism and decentralized settlement patterns are usually concomitant whilst the same can be said of centralized governance and primacy. It is unclear how institutions might influence primacy in Australia’s large states. To better understand, we contextualize Australian federalism within the primacy debate. Using eighteen measures of intergovernmental power, we determined that the Australian federation is comprised of comparably strong federal and state tiers, underlaid by weak local and regional government. The results suggest primacy in Australian states is reinforced by institutions, contrasting the universality of environmental determinism and suggesting an opportunity to decentralize Australia’s growing population through the devolution of decision making powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"438 - 462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1997631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1997631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着澳大利亚人口在21世纪将增长两倍,澳大利亚联邦政府正在投资于权力下放。这是因为澳大利亚各州表现出高度的城市主导地位,其中一个城市占主导地位。首要的制度观点表明,政治因素通常是重要的驱动因素。例如,强烈的地方主义和分散的定居模式通常是相伴而生的,而集中化的治理和首要地位也是如此。目前尚不清楚机构如何影响澳大利亚大州的主导地位。为了更好地理解,我们将澳大利亚的联邦制置于首要地位的辩论中。通过对政府间权力的18项衡量,我们确定澳大利亚联邦由相对强大的联邦和州一级组成,以弱势的地方和地区政府为基础。研究结果表明,制度强化了澳大利亚各州的首要地位,这与环境决定论的普遍性形成了对比,并提出了通过下放决策权来分散澳大利亚不断增长的人口的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federalism and urban primacy: political dimensions that influence the city–country divide in Australia
ABSTRACT With Australia’s population set to triple in the twenty-first century, its federal government is investing in decentralization. This is because Australian states exhibit high urban primacy, where one city is dominantly large. Institutional perspectives of primacy suggest political factors are usually significant drivers. For example, strong localism and decentralized settlement patterns are usually concomitant whilst the same can be said of centralized governance and primacy. It is unclear how institutions might influence primacy in Australia’s large states. To better understand, we contextualize Australian federalism within the primacy debate. Using eighteen measures of intergovernmental power, we determined that the Australian federation is comprised of comparably strong federal and state tiers, underlaid by weak local and regional government. The results suggest primacy in Australian states is reinforced by institutions, contrasting the universality of environmental determinism and suggesting an opportunity to decentralize Australia’s growing population through the devolution of decision making powers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信