官僚政治中的盲点与亮点:印尼环境治理动态中的政策协同生产分析

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Muhammad Alif K. Sahide, Micah R. Fisher, Nurhady Sirimorok, Fatwa Faturachmat, Ahmad Dhiaulhaq, Ahmad Maryudi, Karno B. Batiran, Supratman Supratman
{"title":"官僚政治中的盲点与亮点:印尼环境治理动态中的政策协同生产分析","authors":"Muhammad Alif K. Sahide,&nbsp;Micah R. Fisher,&nbsp;Nurhady Sirimorok,&nbsp;Fatwa Faturachmat,&nbsp;Ahmad Dhiaulhaq,&nbsp;Ahmad Maryudi,&nbsp;Karno B. Batiran,&nbsp;Supratman Supratman","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>There has been growing interest in recent years in a better understanding of knowledge/science and policy co-production in environmental governance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We aim to shed more light on the politics among the numerous actors shaping ideas that drive environmental policy in Indonesia. We focus our theoretical engagement on a framing of bureaucratic politics, which is a research tradition that has made various strides in explaining the formal and non-formal processes that influence environmental governance outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>Building from a wide range of case studies drawn from deep engagement of participatory research in policy-making in Indonesia, we established a simple typology that helps explain eight categories that emerge when bureaucracies, knowledge institutions, and publics come together to shape environmental governance outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The bureaucratic politics specifically clarified the features of cases that have clear fragmentation of bureaucracy but clear explanation variables from the formal and informal interest of bureaucracy. Potential uncovered by bureaucratic politics framing means that, if the metapolitical works alter, the bureaucracy works smoothly or makes it impossible for bureaucracy to operationalize their formal and informal interest in capturing the dynamics of macro and micro politics. In terms of form of knowledge, knowledge produced “from below” can also be used in policy co-production. It can be produced by non-expert actors, or from dialogue among them and sympathetic experts that occur below the bureaucracy's radar (people-driven).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Our ideal policy co-production implication is where the three actors have a strong foundation of “common consciousness” and interact equally to address a particular environmental policy agenda, with enough working space to jointly commit to creating the knowledge base to shape policy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co-production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Alif K. Sahide,&nbsp;Micah R. Fisher,&nbsp;Nurhady Sirimorok,&nbsp;Fatwa Faturachmat,&nbsp;Ahmad Dhiaulhaq,&nbsp;Ahmad Maryudi,&nbsp;Karno B. Batiran,&nbsp;Supratman Supratman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.12693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Motivation</h3>\\n \\n <p>There has been growing interest in recent years in a better understanding of knowledge/science and policy co-production in environmental governance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aim to shed more light on the politics among the numerous actors shaping ideas that drive environmental policy in Indonesia. We focus our theoretical engagement on a framing of bureaucratic politics, which is a research tradition that has made various strides in explaining the formal and non-formal processes that influence environmental governance outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>Building from a wide range of case studies drawn from deep engagement of participatory research in policy-making in Indonesia, we established a simple typology that helps explain eight categories that emerge when bureaucracies, knowledge institutions, and publics come together to shape environmental governance outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The bureaucratic politics specifically clarified the features of cases that have clear fragmentation of bureaucracy but clear explanation variables from the formal and informal interest of bureaucracy. Potential uncovered by bureaucratic politics framing means that, if the metapolitical works alter, the bureaucracy works smoothly or makes it impossible for bureaucracy to operationalize their formal and informal interest in capturing the dynamics of macro and micro politics. In terms of form of knowledge, knowledge produced “from below” can also be used in policy co-production. It can be produced by non-expert actors, or from dialogue among them and sympathetic experts that occur below the bureaucracy's radar (people-driven).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our ideal policy co-production implication is where the three actors have a strong foundation of “common consciousness” and interact equally to address a particular environmental policy agenda, with enough working space to jointly commit to creating the knowledge base to shape policy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们越来越有兴趣更好地了解环境治理中的知识/科学和政策共同生产。我们的目标是更多地揭示在印度尼西亚推动环境政策的众多行动者之间形成思想的政治。我们将我们的理论参与集中在官僚政治的框架上,这是一种研究传统,在解释影响环境治理结果的正式和非正式过程方面取得了各种进展。通过深入参与印度尼西亚政策制定的参与式研究,我们建立了一个简单的类型学,有助于解释在官僚机构、知识机构和公众共同塑造环境治理成果时出现的八个类别。发现官僚政治具体阐明了官僚主义碎片化明显、官僚主义正式利益和非正式利益解释变量明确的案例特征。官僚政治框架所揭示的潜力意味着,如果元政治工作发生变化,官僚机构就会顺利运作,或者使官僚机构无法实现其在捕捉宏观和微观政治动态方面的正式和非正式利益。从知识的形式来看,“自下而上”产生的知识也可以用于政策协同生产。它可以由非专业演员产生,也可以由他们与富有同情心的专家之间的对话产生,这种对话发生在官僚机构的雷达之下(以人为本)。政策影响我们理想的政策合作影响是,三个参与者具有强大的“共同意识”基础,并在解决特定的环境政策议程方面平等互动,有足够的工作空间共同致力于创建知识库以制定政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co-production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia

Motivation

There has been growing interest in recent years in a better understanding of knowledge/science and policy co-production in environmental governance.

Purpose

We aim to shed more light on the politics among the numerous actors shaping ideas that drive environmental policy in Indonesia. We focus our theoretical engagement on a framing of bureaucratic politics, which is a research tradition that has made various strides in explaining the formal and non-formal processes that influence environmental governance outcomes.

Methods and approach

Building from a wide range of case studies drawn from deep engagement of participatory research in policy-making in Indonesia, we established a simple typology that helps explain eight categories that emerge when bureaucracies, knowledge institutions, and publics come together to shape environmental governance outcomes.

Findings

The bureaucratic politics specifically clarified the features of cases that have clear fragmentation of bureaucracy but clear explanation variables from the formal and informal interest of bureaucracy. Potential uncovered by bureaucratic politics framing means that, if the metapolitical works alter, the bureaucracy works smoothly or makes it impossible for bureaucracy to operationalize their formal and informal interest in capturing the dynamics of macro and micro politics. In terms of form of knowledge, knowledge produced “from below” can also be used in policy co-production. It can be produced by non-expert actors, or from dialogue among them and sympathetic experts that occur below the bureaucracy's radar (people-driven).

Policy implications

Our ideal policy co-production implication is where the three actors have a strong foundation of “common consciousness” and interact equally to address a particular environmental policy agenda, with enough working space to jointly commit to creating the knowledge base to shape policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信