危险中的民主:公共雇员言论自由危机

IF 3.2 3区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Administration & Society Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1177/00953997221137568

R. Roberts

{"title":"危险中的民主:公共雇员言论自由危机","authors":"R. Roberts","doi":"10.1177/00953997221137568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that the Pickering/Connick/Garcetti line of cases defining the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of public employees provides them little protection when they engage in organizational dissent. The article explains that the U.S. Supreme Court has embraced a managerial approach to the freedom of speech rights of public employees because of its belief that organizational dissent may seriously undermine the efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations. Due to this fact, the article argues that public employees must develop a comprehensive understanding of First Amendment freedom of speech jurisprudence to maximize their protection from retaliation.","PeriodicalId":47966,"journal":{"name":"Administration & Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"613 - 631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy at Risk: The Public Employee Freedom of Speech Crisis\",\"authors\":\"R. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00953997221137568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article argues that the Pickering/Connick/Garcetti line of cases defining the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of public employees provides them little protection when they engage in organizational dissent. The article explains that the U.S. Supreme Court has embraced a managerial approach to the freedom of speech rights of public employees because of its belief that organizational dissent may seriously undermine the efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations. Due to this fact, the article argues that public employees must develop a comprehensive understanding of First Amendment freedom of speech jurisprudence to maximize their protection from retaliation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration & Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"613 - 631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221137568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration & Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221137568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文章认为，皮克林/康尼克/加塞蒂一系列定义第一修正案公职人员言论自由权利的案件，在他们参与组织异议时，几乎没有为他们提供保护。文章解释说，美国最高法院对公职人员的言论自由权采取了管理方法，因为它认为组织异议可能会严重损害公共组织的效率和效力。鉴于这一事实，文章认为，公职人员必须全面理解《第一修正案》的言论自由判例，以最大限度地保护他们免受报复。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Democracy at Risk: The Public Employee Freedom of Speech Crisis

The article argues that the Pickering/Connick/Garcetti line of cases defining the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of public employees provides them little protection when they engage in organizational dissent. The article explains that the U.S. Supreme Court has embraced a managerial approach to the freedom of speech rights of public employees because of its belief that organizational dissent may seriously undermine the efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations. Due to this fact, the article argues that public employees must develop a comprehensive understanding of First Amendment freedom of speech jurisprudence to maximize their protection from retaliation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Administration & Society PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Administration & Society seeks to further the understanding of public and human service organizations, their administrative processes, and their effect on society. The journal publishes empirically oriented research reports and theoretically specific articles that synthesize or contribute to the advancement of understanding and explanation in these fields. Of particular interest are (1) studies that analyze the effects of the introduction of administrative strategies, programs, change interventions, and training; and (2) studies of intergroup, interorganizational, and organization-environment relationships and policy processes.