{"title":"青铜有什么用?第一部分:支持","authors":"M. Kuijpers, D. Fontijn","doi":"10.1086/721205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution we argue that the adoption of bronze in prehistory implied much more than the introduction of a new material. It allowed for an entirely new range of objects and added a new dimension to notions of standardization. As the first material that is potentially infinitely recyclable, it also afforded novel ideas about the connection between material and classes of valuables.","PeriodicalId":53917,"journal":{"name":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Does Bronze Do? Part I: Affordances\",\"authors\":\"M. Kuijpers, D. Fontijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution we argue that the adoption of bronze in prehistory implied much more than the introduction of a new material. It allowed for an entirely new range of objects and added a new dimension to notions of standardization. As the first material that is potentially infinitely recyclable, it also afforded novel ideas about the connection between material and classes of valuables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this contribution we argue that the adoption of bronze in prehistory implied much more than the introduction of a new material. It allowed for an entirely new range of objects and added a new dimension to notions of standardization. As the first material that is potentially infinitely recyclable, it also afforded novel ideas about the connection between material and classes of valuables.