移动的和尚和山:Chōgen和Gyōki, Mañjuśrī和五台的邪教

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
David Quinter
{"title":"移动的和尚和山:Chōgen和Gyōki, Mañjuśrī和五台的邪教","authors":"David Quinter","doi":"10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The renown of Chōgen (1121–1206), who spearheaded Tōdaiji’s early medieval restoration, rests greatly on his reputed three pilgrimages to China. However, scholars have long questioned Chōgen’s accounts, with some doubting that he ever went. The current majority view is that he did go. But doubts linger concerning other details Chōgen claims, including his professed veneration of Mañjuśrī at Mt. Wutai. On one hand, Kujō Kanezane’s (1149–1207) diary records an 1183 dialogue in which Chōgen reports that he could not travel to Wutai due to the Jin occupation. On the other hand, Chōgen’s 1185 vow for Tōdaiji’s restored Great Buddha claims that he did make it to Wutai. But given that Wutai remained under Jin control then, and we have no evidence for a trip by Chōgen in that interim, how can we understand this incongruity? This article contextualizes that incongruity within Chōgen’s cultic and performative practices, arguing that questions of Chōgen’s veneration of Mañjuśrī ‘at Wutai’ require more than tests of historical veracity to assess. I suggest instead that the very ‘fit’ and ‘non-fit’ of the moving pieces and players provide the keys to understanding how Chōgen places Wutai and his cultic practices within broader cultural imaginaries.","PeriodicalId":36684,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Chinese Religions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving monks and mountains: Chōgen and the cults of Gyōki, Mañjuśrī, and Wutai\",\"authors\":\"David Quinter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The renown of Chōgen (1121–1206), who spearheaded Tōdaiji’s early medieval restoration, rests greatly on his reputed three pilgrimages to China. However, scholars have long questioned Chōgen’s accounts, with some doubting that he ever went. The current majority view is that he did go. But doubts linger concerning other details Chōgen claims, including his professed veneration of Mañjuśrī at Mt. Wutai. On one hand, Kujō Kanezane’s (1149–1207) diary records an 1183 dialogue in which Chōgen reports that he could not travel to Wutai due to the Jin occupation. On the other hand, Chōgen’s 1185 vow for Tōdaiji’s restored Great Buddha claims that he did make it to Wutai. But given that Wutai remained under Jin control then, and we have no evidence for a trip by Chōgen in that interim, how can we understand this incongruity? This article contextualizes that incongruity within Chōgen’s cultic and performative practices, arguing that questions of Chōgen’s veneration of Mañjuśrī ‘at Wutai’ require more than tests of historical veracity to assess. I suggest instead that the very ‘fit’ and ‘non-fit’ of the moving pieces and players provide the keys to understanding how Chōgen places Wutai and his cultic practices within broader cultural imaginaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Chōgen(1121-1206)是Tōdaiji中世纪早期修复的先锋,他的名声很大程度上取决于他著名的三次中国朝圣。然而,学者们长期以来一直质疑Chōgen的说法,有些人怀疑他是否去过。目前大多数人认为他确实去了。但对其他细节Chōgen的说法仍有疑问,包括他自称崇拜Mañjuśrī在五台山。一方面,金泽久井(1149-1207)的日记记录了1183年的一段对话,其中Chōgen报告说,由于金军的占领,他无法前往五台。另一方面,Chōgen在1185年为Tōdaiji的复生大佛立誓时声称,他确实去过五台。但考虑到当时五台仍在金国的控制之下,而且我们没有证据表明Chōgen在此期间进行了一次旅行,我们如何理解这种不协调呢?本文将这种不协调置于Chōgen的崇拜和表演实践中,认为Chōgen对Mañjuśrī“在五台”的崇拜问题需要更多的历史真实性测试来评估。相反,我认为正是这些移动的棋子和角色的“适合”和“不适合”提供了理解Chōgen如何将五台和他的崇拜实践置于更广泛的文化想象中的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving monks and mountains: Chōgen and the cults of Gyōki, Mañjuśrī, and Wutai
ABSTRACT The renown of Chōgen (1121–1206), who spearheaded Tōdaiji’s early medieval restoration, rests greatly on his reputed three pilgrimages to China. However, scholars have long questioned Chōgen’s accounts, with some doubting that he ever went. The current majority view is that he did go. But doubts linger concerning other details Chōgen claims, including his professed veneration of Mañjuśrī at Mt. Wutai. On one hand, Kujō Kanezane’s (1149–1207) diary records an 1183 dialogue in which Chōgen reports that he could not travel to Wutai due to the Jin occupation. On the other hand, Chōgen’s 1185 vow for Tōdaiji’s restored Great Buddha claims that he did make it to Wutai. But given that Wutai remained under Jin control then, and we have no evidence for a trip by Chōgen in that interim, how can we understand this incongruity? This article contextualizes that incongruity within Chōgen’s cultic and performative practices, arguing that questions of Chōgen’s veneration of Mañjuśrī ‘at Wutai’ require more than tests of historical veracity to assess. I suggest instead that the very ‘fit’ and ‘non-fit’ of the moving pieces and players provide the keys to understanding how Chōgen places Wutai and his cultic practices within broader cultural imaginaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Chinese Religions
Studies in Chinese Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信