具有隐藏信息和昂贵的国家验证的企业集团的最优融资

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Rosa Ferrentino, Luca Vota
{"title":"具有隐藏信息和昂贵的国家验证的企业集团的最优融资","authors":"Rosa Ferrentino,&nbsp;Luca Vota","doi":"10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This manuscript addresses the issue, particularly interesting for a conglomerate firm, of the choice of the optimal financing method (namely, the most efficient one) between the joint one and the separate one. In particular, the authors identify the properties of the optimal financing contract for three investment projects under the assumptions of the literature on Costly State Verification (CSV), namely, uncorrelated returns, hidden information (the return of a single project is a borrower’s private information), lender performing sequential audit and residual claimant borrower. The authors’ research method consists of solving the optimization problem of the borrower’s expected utility subject to appropriate incentive constraints and the lender’s participation constraint. The novelty of this contribution is the demonstration that joint financing with return pooling between the high and low states is more efficient than separate financing, as it implies a lower expected audit cost for the lender and, if the investment cost is not too high, also less credit rationing for the borrower. Joint financing with return pooling between the intermediate and low states, instead, is found to be less efficient than separate financing in terms of expected audit cost and, in the presence of sufficiently high investment cost, also credit rationing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45289,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The optimal financing of a conglomerate firm with hidden information and costly state verification\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Ferrentino,&nbsp;Luca Vota\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This manuscript addresses the issue, particularly interesting for a conglomerate firm, of the choice of the optimal financing method (namely, the most efficient one) between the joint one and the separate one. In particular, the authors identify the properties of the optimal financing contract for three investment projects under the assumptions of the literature on Costly State Verification (CSV), namely, uncorrelated returns, hidden information (the return of a single project is a borrower’s private information), lender performing sequential audit and residual claimant borrower. The authors’ research method consists of solving the optimization problem of the borrower’s expected utility subject to appropriate incentive constraints and the lender’s participation constraint. The novelty of this contribution is the demonstration that joint financing with return pooling between the high and low states is more efficient than separate financing, as it implies a lower expected audit cost for the lender and, if the investment cost is not too high, also less credit rationing for the borrower. Joint financing with return pooling between the intermediate and low states, instead, is found to be less efficient than separate financing in terms of expected audit cost and, in the presence of sufficiently high investment cost, also credit rationing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10436-022-00418-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这份手稿解决了一个问题,对于企业集团来说尤其有趣,即在联合融资和单独融资之间选择最佳融资方式(即最有效的融资方式)。特别是,作者在成本状态验证(CSV)文献的假设下,确定了三个投资项目的最佳融资合同的性质,即不相关的回报、隐藏信息(单个项目的回报是借款人的私人信息)、进行顺序审计的贷款人和剩余索赔借款人。作者的研究方法包括在适当的激励约束和贷款人的参与约束下解决借款人的预期效用优化问题。这一贡献的新颖之处在于,证明了在高州和低州之间进行回报池联合融资比单独融资更有效,因为这意味着贷款人的预期审计成本更低,如果投资成本不太高,借款人的信贷配给也更少。相反,在预期审计成本方面,以及在投资成本足够高的情况下,信贷配给方面,中等州和低州之间的回报池联合融资的效率低于单独融资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The optimal financing of a conglomerate firm with hidden information and costly state verification

The optimal financing of a conglomerate firm with hidden information and costly state verification

This manuscript addresses the issue, particularly interesting for a conglomerate firm, of the choice of the optimal financing method (namely, the most efficient one) between the joint one and the separate one. In particular, the authors identify the properties of the optimal financing contract for three investment projects under the assumptions of the literature on Costly State Verification (CSV), namely, uncorrelated returns, hidden information (the return of a single project is a borrower’s private information), lender performing sequential audit and residual claimant borrower. The authors’ research method consists of solving the optimization problem of the borrower’s expected utility subject to appropriate incentive constraints and the lender’s participation constraint. The novelty of this contribution is the demonstration that joint financing with return pooling between the high and low states is more efficient than separate financing, as it implies a lower expected audit cost for the lender and, if the investment cost is not too high, also less credit rationing for the borrower. Joint financing with return pooling between the intermediate and low states, instead, is found to be less efficient than separate financing in terms of expected audit cost and, in the presence of sufficiently high investment cost, also credit rationing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Finance
Annals of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Annals of Finance provides an outlet for original research in all areas of finance and its applications to other disciplines having a clear and substantive link to the general theme of finance. In particular, innovative research papers of moderate length of the highest quality in all scientific areas that are motivated by the analysis of financial problems will be considered. Annals of Finance''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following areas: accounting and finance, asset pricing, banking and finance, capital markets and finance, computational finance, corporate finance, derivatives, dynamical and chaotic systems in finance, economics and finance, empirical finance, experimental finance, finance and the theory of the firm, financial econometrics, financial institutions, mathematical finance, money and finance, portfolio analysis, regulation, stochastic analysis and finance, stock market analysis, systemic risk and financial stability. Annals of Finance also publishes special issues on any topic in finance and its applications of current interest. A small section, entitled finance notes, will be devoted solely to publishing short articles – up to ten pages in length, of substantial interest in finance. Officially cited as: Ann Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信