支持早期代数思维的发展,一种数字的替代方法

Q2 Mathematics
Linda C. H. Venenciano, Seanyelle L. Yagi, Fay K. Zenigami, Barbara J. Dougherty
{"title":"支持早期代数思维的发展,一种数字的替代方法","authors":"Linda C. H. Venenciano, Seanyelle L. Yagi, Fay K. Zenigami, Barbara J. Dougherty","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT First-grade mathematics curriculum has been typically constructed to emphasize the development of whole number and operations. Topics addressed to a lesser extent include algebraic thinking, measurement, and geometry. In this research study, we suggest an alternative to this balance of topics. We compared prior research and learning expectations from the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010) against a learning progression which we proposed as one that develops early algebraic thinking. We described lesson clusters and shared evidence of student thinking to illustrate our learning progression. Findings from this work have implications for what has been considered the start of the learning progression for mathematics.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"12 1","pages":"38 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting the Development of Early Algebraic Thinking, an Alternative Approach to Number\",\"authors\":\"Linda C. H. Venenciano, Seanyelle L. Yagi, Fay K. Zenigami, Barbara J. Dougherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT First-grade mathematics curriculum has been typically constructed to emphasize the development of whole number and operations. Topics addressed to a lesser extent include algebraic thinking, measurement, and geometry. In this research study, we suggest an alternative to this balance of topics. We compared prior research and learning expectations from the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010) against a learning progression which we proposed as one that develops early algebraic thinking. We described lesson clusters and shared evidence of student thinking to illustrate our learning progression. Findings from this work have implications for what has been considered the start of the learning progression for mathematics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要一年级数学课程的构建通常强调整数和运算的发展。较少涉及的主题包括代数思维、测量和几何。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种替代这种主题平衡的方法。我们将之前的研究和来自数学共同核心国家标准(CCSSI,2010)的学习期望与我们提出的发展早期代数思维的学习进展进行了比较。我们描述了课程集群,并分享了学生思维的证据,以说明我们的学习进展。这项工作的发现对数学学习进展的开始有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting the Development of Early Algebraic Thinking, an Alternative Approach to Number
ABSTRACT First-grade mathematics curriculum has been typically constructed to emphasize the development of whole number and operations. Topics addressed to a lesser extent include algebraic thinking, measurement, and geometry. In this research study, we suggest an alternative to this balance of topics. We compared prior research and learning expectations from the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010) against a learning progression which we proposed as one that develops early algebraic thinking. We described lesson clusters and shared evidence of student thinking to illustrate our learning progression. Findings from this work have implications for what has been considered the start of the learning progression for mathematics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信