{"title":"作为一个机构的主流参与:关于“合法性和模糊性:智障人士的制度逻辑及其结果”的评论(Ineland,2020)","authors":"Ilan Wiesel","doi":"10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ineland's (2020) article has offered an original and productive framework to understand and navigate the challenges of mainstream participation by people with intellectual disabilities. The article...","PeriodicalId":43838,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"7 1","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstream participation as an institution: commentary on “Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities” (Ineland, 2020)\",\"authors\":\"Ilan Wiesel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ineland's (2020) article has offered an original and productive framework to understand and navigate the challenges of mainstream participation by people with intellectual disabilities. The article...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"64-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2020.1733435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mainstream participation as an institution: commentary on “Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities” (Ineland, 2020)
Ineland's (2020) article has offered an original and productive framework to understand and navigate the challenges of mainstream participation by people with intellectual disabilities. The article...