{"title":"评价页岩在压裂液中分散性的实验方法","authors":"I. A. Muggli, K. Chellappah, I. Collins","doi":"10.2118/197044-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We propose an experimental approach to evaluate how typical fluids influence shale dispersion. In this approach, finely ground shale is left to settle in the fracturing fluid, generating particle-size and concentration profiles within the settling column. Samples are taken at various settling times and depths and then analyzed with regard to turbidity and capillary-suction-time (CST) behavior. Particle-size-distribution (PSD) measurements are used to further substantiate analysis. Turbidity data indicate the volume of particles present, and PSD data indicate the sizes of these particles (or flocs). This approach was tested using ground shale, Eagle Ford brine (EFB), and three typical fluid additives. Without additives present, shale flocculation resulted in rapid particle settling, and samples taken from suspension gave low turbidity and CST values. With additives present, suspensions were better dispersed and hence tended to give higher CST values. Some additives hindered flocculation more effectively than others. The results suggest that low CST numbers might not always be desirable; additives that are good inhibitors might hinder flocculation of shale particulates and hence promote higher CST numbers. In this paper we discuss how our proposed experimental approach can give insights into the influence of additives on the degree and nature of shale dispersion.","PeriodicalId":22071,"journal":{"name":"Spe Production & Operations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/197044-PA","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Approach To Assess the Dispersion of Shale in Fracturing Fluids\",\"authors\":\"I. A. Muggli, K. Chellappah, I. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197044-PA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We propose an experimental approach to evaluate how typical fluids influence shale dispersion. In this approach, finely ground shale is left to settle in the fracturing fluid, generating particle-size and concentration profiles within the settling column. Samples are taken at various settling times and depths and then analyzed with regard to turbidity and capillary-suction-time (CST) behavior. Particle-size-distribution (PSD) measurements are used to further substantiate analysis. Turbidity data indicate the volume of particles present, and PSD data indicate the sizes of these particles (or flocs). This approach was tested using ground shale, Eagle Ford brine (EFB), and three typical fluid additives. Without additives present, shale flocculation resulted in rapid particle settling, and samples taken from suspension gave low turbidity and CST values. With additives present, suspensions were better dispersed and hence tended to give higher CST values. Some additives hindered flocculation more effectively than others. The results suggest that low CST numbers might not always be desirable; additives that are good inhibitors might hinder flocculation of shale particulates and hence promote higher CST numbers. In this paper we discuss how our proposed experimental approach can give insights into the influence of additives on the degree and nature of shale dispersion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spe Production & Operations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/197044-PA\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spe Production & Operations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197044-PA\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Production & Operations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197044-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Experimental Approach To Assess the Dispersion of Shale in Fracturing Fluids
We propose an experimental approach to evaluate how typical fluids influence shale dispersion. In this approach, finely ground shale is left to settle in the fracturing fluid, generating particle-size and concentration profiles within the settling column. Samples are taken at various settling times and depths and then analyzed with regard to turbidity and capillary-suction-time (CST) behavior. Particle-size-distribution (PSD) measurements are used to further substantiate analysis. Turbidity data indicate the volume of particles present, and PSD data indicate the sizes of these particles (or flocs). This approach was tested using ground shale, Eagle Ford brine (EFB), and three typical fluid additives. Without additives present, shale flocculation resulted in rapid particle settling, and samples taken from suspension gave low turbidity and CST values. With additives present, suspensions were better dispersed and hence tended to give higher CST values. Some additives hindered flocculation more effectively than others. The results suggest that low CST numbers might not always be desirable; additives that are good inhibitors might hinder flocculation of shale particulates and hence promote higher CST numbers. In this paper we discuss how our proposed experimental approach can give insights into the influence of additives on the degree and nature of shale dispersion.
期刊介绍:
SPE Production & Operations includes papers on production operations, artificial lift, downhole equipment, formation damage control, multiphase flow, workovers, stimulation, facility design and operations, water treatment, project management, construction methods and equipment, and related PFC systems and emerging technologies.