新西兰租赁审裁处检讨住宅甲基苯丙胺污染政策后的结果

IF 2.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand Pub Date : 2022-07-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/03036758.2022.2103575
Claudia Denisse Sanchez Lozano, Chris Wilkins, Marta Rychert
{"title":"新西兰租赁审裁处检讨住宅甲基苯丙胺污染政策后的结果","authors":"Claudia Denisse Sanchez Lozano, Chris Wilkins, Marta Rychert","doi":"10.1080/03036758.2022.2103575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The New Zealand policy response to methamphetamine contamination of housing has resulted in reduction of public housing stock, award of significant remediation costs and evictions. The New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal (NZTT) has adjudicated methamphetamine contamination disputes between tenants and landlords without specific guidance in legislation. A 2018 scientific review by the Chief Science Advisor prompted a significant increase in the contamination threshold. To evaluate the outcomes from this policy change, we compared 195 NZTT orders following the threshold increase with 685 orders from before the threshold increase. Landlords remain as major applicants to the NZTT. Cases involving public housing tenancies dramatically decreased from 33% (pre threshold increase) to none. Mention of baseline testing and methamphetamine test results became more prominent after the threshold increase. The average remediation costs decreased from NZ$10,300 to NZ$3,500 per order, perhaps reflecting fewer rooms of houses requiring remediation under the new threshold. Applicants and respondents continued to support their claims based on different scientific thresholds and reports. Discrepancies between adjudicators' interpretations of test results and the threshold to apply continued to generate inconsistencies in NZTT decisions. Legislative and regulatory guidance is still needed to consistently and equitably resolve these disputes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","volume":"53 1","pages":"219-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes from the New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal after a review of policy on residential housing methamphetamine contamination.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Denisse Sanchez Lozano, Chris Wilkins, Marta Rychert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03036758.2022.2103575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The New Zealand policy response to methamphetamine contamination of housing has resulted in reduction of public housing stock, award of significant remediation costs and evictions. The New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal (NZTT) has adjudicated methamphetamine contamination disputes between tenants and landlords without specific guidance in legislation. A 2018 scientific review by the Chief Science Advisor prompted a significant increase in the contamination threshold. To evaluate the outcomes from this policy change, we compared 195 NZTT orders following the threshold increase with 685 orders from before the threshold increase. Landlords remain as major applicants to the NZTT. Cases involving public housing tenancies dramatically decreased from 33% (pre threshold increase) to none. Mention of baseline testing and methamphetamine test results became more prominent after the threshold increase. The average remediation costs decreased from NZ$10,300 to NZ$3,500 per order, perhaps reflecting fewer rooms of houses requiring remediation under the new threshold. Applicants and respondents continued to support their claims based on different scientific thresholds and reports. Discrepancies between adjudicators' interpretations of test results and the threshold to apply continued to generate inconsistencies in NZTT decisions. Legislative and regulatory guidance is still needed to consistently and equitably resolve these disputes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"219-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2103575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2103575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新西兰对住房甲基苯丙胺污染的政策反应导致公共住房存量减少,奖励重大补救成本和驱逐。新西兰租赁法庭(NZTT)在没有具体立法指导的情况下裁决了租户和房东之间的甲基苯丙胺污染纠纷。首席科学顾问在2018年进行的一项科学审查促使污染阈值大幅提高。为了评估这一政策变化的结果,我们将门槛提高后的195份NZTT订单与门槛提高前的685份订单进行了比较。房东仍然是NZTT的主要申请人。涉及公共房屋租约的个案由33%(门槛前增加)大幅减少至零。阈值提高后,基线测试和甲基苯丙胺测试结果的提及变得更加突出。每笔订单的平均修复成本从10300新西兰元降至3500新西兰元,这可能反映出在新门槛下需要修复的房屋房间减少了。申请人和应答者继续根据不同的科学阈值和报告来支持他们的主张。裁判对测试结果的解释和申请门槛之间的差异继续产生NZTT决定的不一致。仍然需要立法和监管指导,以一致和公平地解决这些争端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes from the New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal after a review of policy on residential housing methamphetamine contamination.

The New Zealand policy response to methamphetamine contamination of housing has resulted in reduction of public housing stock, award of significant remediation costs and evictions. The New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal (NZTT) has adjudicated methamphetamine contamination disputes between tenants and landlords without specific guidance in legislation. A 2018 scientific review by the Chief Science Advisor prompted a significant increase in the contamination threshold. To evaluate the outcomes from this policy change, we compared 195 NZTT orders following the threshold increase with 685 orders from before the threshold increase. Landlords remain as major applicants to the NZTT. Cases involving public housing tenancies dramatically decreased from 33% (pre threshold increase) to none. Mention of baseline testing and methamphetamine test results became more prominent after the threshold increase. The average remediation costs decreased from NZ$10,300 to NZ$3,500 per order, perhaps reflecting fewer rooms of houses requiring remediation under the new threshold. Applicants and respondents continued to support their claims based on different scientific thresholds and reports. Discrepancies between adjudicators' interpretations of test results and the threshold to apply continued to generate inconsistencies in NZTT decisions. Legislative and regulatory guidance is still needed to consistently and equitably resolve these disputes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims: The Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand reflects the role of Royal Society Te Aparangi in fostering research and debate across natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in New Zealand/Aotearoa and the surrounding Pacific. Research published in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand advances scientific knowledge, informs government policy, public awareness and broader society, and is read by researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信