2015年的刑法修正案是否改变了适用保护措施的做法?研究报告

Probacja Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0014.9325
Małgorzata Pyrcak-Górowska
{"title":"2015年的刑法修正案是否改变了适用保护措施的做法?研究报告","authors":"Małgorzata Pyrcak-Górowska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.9325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is the result of the research on the practice of applying a protective\nmeasure in the form of placement in a forensic psychiatric facility\nan insane perpetrator, before and after July 1st, 2015. The purpose of the\nresearch was to determine whether and how outpatient protective measures\ninfluenced the practice of applying psychiatric detention in case of\ninsane persons, in particular, whether outpatient treatment is used instead\nof placement in a psychiatric facility in the case of committing offences\nwith a lower degree of social harmfulness. The purpose of the research\non the procedural law was to determine whether the judicature of the\nSupreme Court emphasizing the procedural standard in cases concerning\nthe discontinuation of proceedings against an insane perpetrator affected\nthe observance of procedural guarantees of insane perpetrators in criminal\nproceedings. The conclusions of the research are based on the statistical\ndata of the Ministry of Justice, the General Prosecutor’s Office and the\nfile research. The conclusions of the research are as follows: there was no significant change concerning the practice of imposing placement in\na psychiatric facility on insane perpetrators after July 1st, 2015. The types\nof prohibited acts the commission of which justify placing the perpetrator\nin a psychiatric facility have not changed significantly. On the other\nhand, the procedural guarantees of the insane perpetrator are respected\nto a slightly higher degree at present. Therefore, it should be considered\nwhether the conditions for the application of placement in a psychiatric\nfacility should not be restricted only to a situation where the perpetrator\nposes a threat to selected, most important legal goods.\n\n","PeriodicalId":34028,"journal":{"name":"Probacja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HAS THE 2015 AMENDMENT TO THE CRIMINAL\\nCODE CHANGED THE PRACTICE OF APPLYING\\nPROTECTIVE MEASURES? RESEARCH REPORT\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Pyrcak-Górowska\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0014.9325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is the result of the research on the practice of applying a protective\\nmeasure in the form of placement in a forensic psychiatric facility\\nan insane perpetrator, before and after July 1st, 2015. The purpose of the\\nresearch was to determine whether and how outpatient protective measures\\ninfluenced the practice of applying psychiatric detention in case of\\ninsane persons, in particular, whether outpatient treatment is used instead\\nof placement in a psychiatric facility in the case of committing offences\\nwith a lower degree of social harmfulness. The purpose of the research\\non the procedural law was to determine whether the judicature of the\\nSupreme Court emphasizing the procedural standard in cases concerning\\nthe discontinuation of proceedings against an insane perpetrator affected\\nthe observance of procedural guarantees of insane perpetrators in criminal\\nproceedings. The conclusions of the research are based on the statistical\\ndata of the Ministry of Justice, the General Prosecutor’s Office and the\\nfile research. The conclusions of the research are as follows: there was no significant change concerning the practice of imposing placement in\\na psychiatric facility on insane perpetrators after July 1st, 2015. The types\\nof prohibited acts the commission of which justify placing the perpetrator\\nin a psychiatric facility have not changed significantly. On the other\\nhand, the procedural guarantees of the insane perpetrator are respected\\nto a slightly higher degree at present. Therefore, it should be considered\\nwhether the conditions for the application of placement in a psychiatric\\nfacility should not be restricted only to a situation where the perpetrator\\nposes a threat to selected, most important legal goods.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probacja\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probacja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对2015年7月1日前后精神错乱加害人以安置形式实施保护措施的实践进行研究的结果。研究的目的是确定门诊保护措施是否以及如何影响对精神病患者实施精神拘留的做法,特别是,在社会危害程度较低的犯罪案件中,是否使用门诊治疗而不是将其安置在精神病院。对程序法进行研究的目的是确定最高法院在有关中止对精神失常罪犯的诉讼的案件中强调程序标准的司法是否影响了对精神失常罪犯在刑事诉讼中程序保障的遵守。本文的研究结论是基于司法部、总检察院的统计数据和档案研究得出的。本研究的结论是:2015年7月1日之后,精神错乱犯罪者被安置在精神病院的做法没有显著变化。犯了违禁行为而有理由将犯罪者送入精神病院的行为类型没有发生重大变化。另一方面,目前对精神失常行为人的程序保障的尊重程度略高。因此,应考虑是否应将申请安置在精神病院的条件仅限于犯罪者对选定的、最重要的法律物品构成威胁的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HAS THE 2015 AMENDMENT TO THE CRIMINAL CODE CHANGED THE PRACTICE OF APPLYING PROTECTIVE MEASURES? RESEARCH REPORT
The article is the result of the research on the practice of applying a protective measure in the form of placement in a forensic psychiatric facility an insane perpetrator, before and after July 1st, 2015. The purpose of the research was to determine whether and how outpatient protective measures influenced the practice of applying psychiatric detention in case of insane persons, in particular, whether outpatient treatment is used instead of placement in a psychiatric facility in the case of committing offences with a lower degree of social harmfulness. The purpose of the research on the procedural law was to determine whether the judicature of the Supreme Court emphasizing the procedural standard in cases concerning the discontinuation of proceedings against an insane perpetrator affected the observance of procedural guarantees of insane perpetrators in criminal proceedings. The conclusions of the research are based on the statistical data of the Ministry of Justice, the General Prosecutor’s Office and the file research. The conclusions of the research are as follows: there was no significant change concerning the practice of imposing placement in a psychiatric facility on insane perpetrators after July 1st, 2015. The types of prohibited acts the commission of which justify placing the perpetrator in a psychiatric facility have not changed significantly. On the other hand, the procedural guarantees of the insane perpetrator are respected to a slightly higher degree at present. Therefore, it should be considered whether the conditions for the application of placement in a psychiatric facility should not be restricted only to a situation where the perpetrator poses a threat to selected, most important legal goods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信