Fabienne Meier, S. A. Landolt, T. Bradbury, G. Bodenmann
{"title":"抑郁症患者及其伴侣死亡应对的公平性","authors":"Fabienne Meier, S. A. Landolt, T. Bradbury, G. Bodenmann","doi":"10.1521/JSCP.2021.40.3.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For couples, depression can position diagnosed partners to receive dyadic coping and mates to primarily provide support. We examine whether inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms. Methods: Using data from 62 mixed-gender couples with one partner diagnosed with major depression (60% female), we computed differences between provided and received dyadic coping reported by both partners. With Response Surface Analyses we examined the associations with depressive symptoms. Results: In patients, lower equity of dyadic coping was associated with more depressive symptoms, regardless of whether the patient felt underbenefitted or overbenefitted. In partners, dyadic coping was negatively associated with depressive symptoms while equity of dyadic coping showed no significant associations. Patients and partners both reported providing more dyadic coping than they received. Discussion: Inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms in patients, beyond main effects of dyadic coping, justifying the inclusion of couples in treatment for depression.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity of Dyadic Coping in Patients with Depression and Their Partners\",\"authors\":\"Fabienne Meier, S. A. Landolt, T. Bradbury, G. Bodenmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/JSCP.2021.40.3.249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: For couples, depression can position diagnosed partners to receive dyadic coping and mates to primarily provide support. We examine whether inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms. Methods: Using data from 62 mixed-gender couples with one partner diagnosed with major depression (60% female), we computed differences between provided and received dyadic coping reported by both partners. With Response Surface Analyses we examined the associations with depressive symptoms. Results: In patients, lower equity of dyadic coping was associated with more depressive symptoms, regardless of whether the patient felt underbenefitted or overbenefitted. In partners, dyadic coping was negatively associated with depressive symptoms while equity of dyadic coping showed no significant associations. Patients and partners both reported providing more dyadic coping than they received. Discussion: Inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms in patients, beyond main effects of dyadic coping, justifying the inclusion of couples in treatment for depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/JSCP.2021.40.3.249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/JSCP.2021.40.3.249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Equity of Dyadic Coping in Patients with Depression and Their Partners
Introduction: For couples, depression can position diagnosed partners to receive dyadic coping and mates to primarily provide support. We examine whether inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms. Methods: Using data from 62 mixed-gender couples with one partner diagnosed with major depression (60% female), we computed differences between provided and received dyadic coping reported by both partners. With Response Surface Analyses we examined the associations with depressive symptoms. Results: In patients, lower equity of dyadic coping was associated with more depressive symptoms, regardless of whether the patient felt underbenefitted or overbenefitted. In partners, dyadic coping was negatively associated with depressive symptoms while equity of dyadic coping showed no significant associations. Patients and partners both reported providing more dyadic coping than they received. Discussion: Inequities in dyadic coping covary with depressive symptoms in patients, beyond main effects of dyadic coping, justifying the inclusion of couples in treatment for depression.
期刊介绍:
This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.