圣马特奥效应在小学阅读发展纵向研究中的分析(1。°至5°)

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Manuel Aguilar Villagrán, Estíbaliz Aragón Mendizabal, José I. Navarro Guzmán, Cándida Delgado Casas, Esperanza Marchena Consejero
{"title":"圣马特奥效应在小学阅读发展纵向研究中的分析(1。°至5°)","authors":"Manuel Aguilar Villagrán,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Aragón Mendizabal,&nbsp;José I. Navarro Guzmán,&nbsp;Cándida Delgado Casas,&nbsp;Esperanza Marchena Consejero","doi":"10.1016/j.ejeps.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Matthew effect on reading refers the contrasted phenomenon on how differences in performance between good and poor readers can increase over time. A longitudinal study was conducted on the presence/absence of Matthew effect in a sample of 1st to 5th year Primary School children. A total of 51 students who started Primary School in 2011 were evaluated five times by several reading measurement tools: Collective Test of Reading Efficacy (TECLE), PROLEC-R (a battery of tests for the evaluation of reading processes, ACL (a Spanish reading comprehension test), and BEL (a standardised Spanish reading test). Assessment was carried out each June between 2011 and 2015. A group of children (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13) considered at risk of being low performance readers (using a percentile criterion below 25 obtained on the TECLE test at the end of the 1st year). A comparison was then made of the progress over 5 years between this group, and a group of average performance readers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26), as well as high-level performance readers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) from the same sample of participants. Tracking the reader profile of students at risk, helps to determine the changes generated in these children through the different assessments over the five years of the study. The overall results showed differences between the groups assessed, but differences between readers at risk and other groups were not increased. Furthermore, the individual monitoring of students at risk showed that some children improvised his/her performance in reading above the average. Educational suggestions from the study are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44987,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejeps.2016.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis del efecto san Mateo en un estudio longitudinal sobre el desarrollo lector durante la educación primaria (1.° a 5.°)\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Aguilar Villagrán,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Aragón Mendizabal,&nbsp;José I. Navarro Guzmán,&nbsp;Cándida Delgado Casas,&nbsp;Esperanza Marchena Consejero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejeps.2016.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Matthew effect on reading refers the contrasted phenomenon on how differences in performance between good and poor readers can increase over time. A longitudinal study was conducted on the presence/absence of Matthew effect in a sample of 1st to 5th year Primary School children. A total of 51 students who started Primary School in 2011 were evaluated five times by several reading measurement tools: Collective Test of Reading Efficacy (TECLE), PROLEC-R (a battery of tests for the evaluation of reading processes, ACL (a Spanish reading comprehension test), and BEL (a standardised Spanish reading test). Assessment was carried out each June between 2011 and 2015. A group of children (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13) considered at risk of being low performance readers (using a percentile criterion below 25 obtained on the TECLE test at the end of the 1st year). A comparison was then made of the progress over 5 years between this group, and a group of average performance readers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26), as well as high-level performance readers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) from the same sample of participants. Tracking the reader profile of students at risk, helps to determine the changes generated in these children through the different assessments over the five years of the study. The overall results showed differences between the groups assessed, but differences between readers at risk and other groups were not increased. Furthermore, the individual monitoring of students at risk showed that some children improvised his/her performance in reading above the average. Educational suggestions from the study are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejeps.2016.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888899216300228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888899216300228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

阅读上的马太效应指的是一种对比现象,即优秀读者和糟糕读者之间的表现差异会随着时间的推移而增加。本研究以小学一至五年级儿童为样本,对马太效应的存在与不存在进行了纵向研究。本研究共对2011年入学的51名小学生进行了五次阅读测试,测试工具包括:阅读效能集体测试(TECLE)、PROLEC-R(一系列阅读过程评估测试)、ACL(西班牙语阅读理解测试)和BEL(西班牙语标准化阅读测试)。评估于2011年至2015年期间每年6月进行。一组儿童(n = 13)被认为有阅读能力低下的风险(使用第一年结束时在TECLE测试中获得的低于25的百分位标准)。然后将这一组与来自同一参与者样本的一组表现一般的阅读者(n = 26)和一组表现良好的阅读者(n = 12)在5年内的进展进行比较。跟踪读者对有风险学生的资料,有助于确定在五年的研究中通过不同的评估在这些孩子身上产生的变化。总体结果显示了评估组之间的差异,但处于危险中的读者和其他组之间的差异并没有增加。此外,对有风险学生的个别监测显示,一些孩子在阅读方面的表现超过了平均水平。并对研究提出的教育建议进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análisis del efecto san Mateo en un estudio longitudinal sobre el desarrollo lector durante la educación primaria (1.° a 5.°)

The Matthew effect on reading refers the contrasted phenomenon on how differences in performance between good and poor readers can increase over time. A longitudinal study was conducted on the presence/absence of Matthew effect in a sample of 1st to 5th year Primary School children. A total of 51 students who started Primary School in 2011 were evaluated five times by several reading measurement tools: Collective Test of Reading Efficacy (TECLE), PROLEC-R (a battery of tests for the evaluation of reading processes, ACL (a Spanish reading comprehension test), and BEL (a standardised Spanish reading test). Assessment was carried out each June between 2011 and 2015. A group of children (n = 13) considered at risk of being low performance readers (using a percentile criterion below 25 obtained on the TECLE test at the end of the 1st year). A comparison was then made of the progress over 5 years between this group, and a group of average performance readers (n = 26), as well as high-level performance readers (n = 12) from the same sample of participants. Tracking the reader profile of students at risk, helps to determine the changes generated in these children through the different assessments over the five years of the study. The overall results showed differences between the groups assessed, but differences between readers at risk and other groups were not increased. Furthermore, the individual monitoring of students at risk showed that some children improvised his/her performance in reading above the average. Educational suggestions from the study are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信