{"title":"仍然没有邓宁-克鲁格效应:对希特勒的回应","authors":"Gilles E. Gignac , Marcin Zajenkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary criticism raised by Hiller (2023) pertained to the transformation of the self-assessed intelligence (SAI) scores applied by Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020), an investigation that suggested the Dunning-Kruger effect (DKE) may be primarily a statistical artefact. Hiller recommended an alternative transformation. Our re-analysis of Gignac and Zajenkowski's data with Hiller's recommended transformation failed to find evidence in favour of the DK hypothesis. Hiller also recommended SAI measurement with a percentile-based approach. Based on a review of the literature, one investigation has employed a percentile-based approach to SAI measurement, and it largely failed to support the DK hypothesis, when analysed with the non-linear regression approach recommended by Gignac and Zajenkowski. We conclude by encouraging researchers to continue to derive novel approaches to testing the DK hypothesis, especially approaches that overcome known methodological challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Still no Dunning-Kruger effect: A reply to Hiller\",\"authors\":\"Gilles E. Gignac , Marcin Zajenkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The primary criticism raised by Hiller (2023) pertained to the transformation of the self-assessed intelligence (SAI) scores applied by Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020), an investigation that suggested the Dunning-Kruger effect (DKE) may be primarily a statistical artefact. Hiller recommended an alternative transformation. Our re-analysis of Gignac and Zajenkowski's data with Hiller's recommended transformation failed to find evidence in favour of the DK hypothesis. Hiller also recommended SAI measurement with a percentile-based approach. Based on a review of the literature, one investigation has employed a percentile-based approach to SAI measurement, and it largely failed to support the DK hypothesis, when analysed with the non-linear regression approach recommended by Gignac and Zajenkowski. We conclude by encouraging researchers to continue to derive novel approaches to testing the DK hypothesis, especially approaches that overcome known methodological challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000144\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The primary criticism raised by Hiller (2023) pertained to the transformation of the self-assessed intelligence (SAI) scores applied by Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020), an investigation that suggested the Dunning-Kruger effect (DKE) may be primarily a statistical artefact. Hiller recommended an alternative transformation. Our re-analysis of Gignac and Zajenkowski's data with Hiller's recommended transformation failed to find evidence in favour of the DK hypothesis. Hiller also recommended SAI measurement with a percentile-based approach. Based on a review of the literature, one investigation has employed a percentile-based approach to SAI measurement, and it largely failed to support the DK hypothesis, when analysed with the non-linear regression approach recommended by Gignac and Zajenkowski. We conclude by encouraging researchers to continue to derive novel approaches to testing the DK hypothesis, especially approaches that overcome known methodological challenges.
期刊介绍：
This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
