卡普托与激进的语言

IF 0.4 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

JOURNAL OF RELIGION Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1086/719795

L. Hedrick

{"title":"卡普托与激进的语言","authors":"L. Hedrick","doi":"10.1086/719795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this review article, I offer a critical reading of John D. Caputo’s polymorphic account of “radical theology.” Following Caputo’s lead, I remain cognizant of the ways in which critique “of” radical theology might always also be critique “as” radical theology, insofar as it performs the “inexhaustibility of recontextualizablility.” In exploring Caputo’s language of radicality, I play with this line between its rooting for and its rooting out of theology.","PeriodicalId":45199,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caputo and the Language of Radicality\",\"authors\":\"L. Hedrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this review article, I offer a critical reading of John D. Caputo’s polymorphic account of “radical theology.” Following Caputo’s lead, I remain cognizant of the ways in which critique “of” radical theology might always also be critique “as” radical theology, insofar as it performs the “inexhaustibility of recontextualizablility.” In exploring Caputo’s language of radicality, I play with this line between its rooting for and its rooting out of theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论文章中，我对约翰·D·卡普托对“激进神学”的多态性描述进行了批判性的解读。在卡普托的领导下，我仍然认识到，对“激进的神学”的批判“也可能永远是批判”，就像“激进的神学”一样，只要它表现出“不可穷尽的可重新文本化”。“在探索卡普托的激进主义语言时，我在它的根源和它的根源之间划出了这条线。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Caputo and the Language of Radicality

In this review article, I offer a critical reading of John D. Caputo’s polymorphic account of “radical theology.” Following Caputo’s lead, I remain cognizant of the ways in which critique “of” radical theology might always also be critique “as” radical theology, insofar as it performs the “inexhaustibility of recontextualizablility.” In exploring Caputo’s language of radicality, I play with this line between its rooting for and its rooting out of theology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF RELIGION RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Religion is one of the publications by which the Divinity School of The University of Chicago seeks to promote critical, hermeneutical, historical, and constructive inquiry into religion. While expecting articles to advance scholarship in their respective fields in a lucid, cogent, and fresh way, the Journal is especially interested in areas of research with a broad range of implications for scholars of religion, or cross-disciplinary relevance. The Editors welcome submissions in theology, religious ethics, and philosophy of religion, as well as articles that approach the role of religion in culture and society from a historical, sociological, psychological, linguistic, or artistic standpoint.