艾米丽·狄金森在类比的边缘:列文谜

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Shira Wolosky
{"title":"艾米丽·狄金森在类比的边缘:列文谜","authors":"Shira Wolosky","doi":"10.1353/edj.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Like a number of nineteenth-century thinkers including Nietzsche, Emerson, and Whitman, Emily Dickinson challenges the metaphysical map that had charted thought in religion and philosophy along analogical paths since Plato. With far more anxiety than her contemporaries, she challenges the rule of analogy as what grounds, aligns, and configures experience, with radical implications for poetics, for metaphysics, and for the risks of post-metaphysical meaning. Dickinson's work balances on the edge of analogy, at a break in its idealization and its reign of/as intelligibility. Her resistance to analogy threatens incoherence but also points to new senses in which the rupture of likeness within unity is affirmative. In the twentieth century, Emmanuel Levinas explores the possibility of such a positive post-metaphysics, theorizing a mode for valuing multiplicity rather than unity in both the world and art. His challenge to totality points not to a destructive collapse of coherence but to another kind of making-sense of experience, both in conduct and interpretation. Does Dickinson also? Do her moments of disorientation also open to reorientation? Sometimes. Dickinson's verses are terse and lapidary, and closer analysis shows them to be self-interruptive, full of cracks and breaks that rupture what at first seem declarations or definitions or iconic representations of states or observations. Yet these interruptions can be positive ventures, where the limitations of analogy are exposed, and its ruptures experienced not only negatively but also positively, in ways that are clarified in Levinasian terms.","PeriodicalId":41721,"journal":{"name":"Emily Dickinson Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emily Dickinson at the Edge of Analogy: Levinasian Enigma\",\"authors\":\"Shira Wolosky\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/edj.2022.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Like a number of nineteenth-century thinkers including Nietzsche, Emerson, and Whitman, Emily Dickinson challenges the metaphysical map that had charted thought in religion and philosophy along analogical paths since Plato. With far more anxiety than her contemporaries, she challenges the rule of analogy as what grounds, aligns, and configures experience, with radical implications for poetics, for metaphysics, and for the risks of post-metaphysical meaning. Dickinson's work balances on the edge of analogy, at a break in its idealization and its reign of/as intelligibility. Her resistance to analogy threatens incoherence but also points to new senses in which the rupture of likeness within unity is affirmative. In the twentieth century, Emmanuel Levinas explores the possibility of such a positive post-metaphysics, theorizing a mode for valuing multiplicity rather than unity in both the world and art. His challenge to totality points not to a destructive collapse of coherence but to another kind of making-sense of experience, both in conduct and interpretation. Does Dickinson also? Do her moments of disorientation also open to reorientation? Sometimes. Dickinson's verses are terse and lapidary, and closer analysis shows them to be self-interruptive, full of cracks and breaks that rupture what at first seem declarations or definitions or iconic representations of states or observations. Yet these interruptions can be positive ventures, where the limitations of analogy are exposed, and its ruptures experienced not only negatively but also positively, in ways that are clarified in Levinasian terms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emily Dickinson Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emily Dickinson Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/edj.2022.0002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emily Dickinson Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/edj.2022.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:与尼采、爱默生和惠特曼等19世纪思想家一样,艾米莉·狄金森挑战了自柏拉图以来沿着类比路径描绘宗教和哲学思想的形而上学地图。带着比同时代人多得多的焦虑,她挑战了类比的规则,以此作为经验的基础、排列和配置,对诗学、形而上学以及后形而上学意义的风险有着激进的影响。狄金森的作品在类比的边缘保持平衡,打破了其理想化和可理解性的统治。她对类比的抵制威胁到不连贯,但也指出了新的意义,在这种意义上,统一中相似性的破裂是肯定的。在20世纪,伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)探索了这种积极的后形而上学的可能性,在世界和艺术中理论化了一种重视多样性而不是统一性的模式。他对整体的挑战不是指向连贯性的破坏性崩溃,而是指向另一种对经验的理解,包括行为和解释。狄金森也是吗?她迷失方向的时刻也会重新定位吗?有时。狄金森的诗简洁而精雕细琢,仔细分析就会发现它们是自我中断的,充满了裂缝和断裂,打破了最初看起来像是声明、定义或对状态或观察的标志性表现。然而,这些中断可以是积极的冒险,在这里,类比的局限性被暴露出来,它的破裂不仅是消极的,而且是积极的,以列维纳斯术语澄清的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emily Dickinson at the Edge of Analogy: Levinasian Enigma
Abstract:Like a number of nineteenth-century thinkers including Nietzsche, Emerson, and Whitman, Emily Dickinson challenges the metaphysical map that had charted thought in religion and philosophy along analogical paths since Plato. With far more anxiety than her contemporaries, she challenges the rule of analogy as what grounds, aligns, and configures experience, with radical implications for poetics, for metaphysics, and for the risks of post-metaphysical meaning. Dickinson's work balances on the edge of analogy, at a break in its idealization and its reign of/as intelligibility. Her resistance to analogy threatens incoherence but also points to new senses in which the rupture of likeness within unity is affirmative. In the twentieth century, Emmanuel Levinas explores the possibility of such a positive post-metaphysics, theorizing a mode for valuing multiplicity rather than unity in both the world and art. His challenge to totality points not to a destructive collapse of coherence but to another kind of making-sense of experience, both in conduct and interpretation. Does Dickinson also? Do her moments of disorientation also open to reorientation? Sometimes. Dickinson's verses are terse and lapidary, and closer analysis shows them to be self-interruptive, full of cracks and breaks that rupture what at first seem declarations or definitions or iconic representations of states or observations. Yet these interruptions can be positive ventures, where the limitations of analogy are exposed, and its ruptures experienced not only negatively but also positively, in ways that are clarified in Levinasian terms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Emily Dickinson Journal (EDJ) showcases the poet at the center of current critical practices and perspectives. EDJ features writing by talented young scholars as well as work by those established in the field. Contributors explore the many ways in which Dickinson illuminates and challenges. No other journal provides this quality or quantity of scholarship on Dickinson. The Emily Dickinson Journal is sponsored by the Emily Dickinson International Society (EDIS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信