复合材料层合板断裂试样的系统分析:拉伸、弯曲、I型和II型试验的不同视角

Q1 Engineering
Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun , Tomohiro Yokozeki
{"title":"复合材料层合板断裂试样的系统分析:拉伸、弯曲、I型和II型试验的不同视角","authors":"Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Yokozeki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Novel hybrid laminates consisting of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers and steel plate cold commercial (CFRP-SPCC) have been successfully manufactured and tested in the present study. Four different tests have been made i.e., tensile test, flexural test, double cantilever beam (DCB) or Mode I test, and end notched flexure (ENF) or Mode II test. After being tested, these samples need to be evaluated. Hence, an inappropriate evaluation step while identifying the cause of failure of the failed specimens can create a false conclusion. The present study aims to systematically evaluate the fractured specimens of CFRP-SPCC in different tests (tensile, flexural, DCB, and ENF test) using different tools, i.e., pocket camera, digital microscope, light microscope, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The results showed, in terms of tensile, the highest strength occurred with 1475.4 MPa. In comparison, the highest flexural strength occurred with 1516.1 MPa, while DCB and ENF showed the highest values with 116.4 and 330 J/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that digital and light microscopes are satisfied to evaluate the specimen in tensile test. However, for the flexural test, ENF, and DCB test, besides the light microscope, further analysis using SEM-EDX is recommended to evaluate the specimen after failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic analysis of fractured specimens of composite laminates: Different perspectives between tensile, flexural, Mode I, and Mode II test\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Yokozeki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Novel hybrid laminates consisting of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers and steel plate cold commercial (CFRP-SPCC) have been successfully manufactured and tested in the present study. Four different tests have been made i.e., tensile test, flexural test, double cantilever beam (DCB) or Mode I test, and end notched flexure (ENF) or Mode II test. After being tested, these samples need to be evaluated. Hence, an inappropriate evaluation step while identifying the cause of failure of the failed specimens can create a false conclusion. The present study aims to systematically evaluate the fractured specimens of CFRP-SPCC in different tests (tensile, flexural, DCB, and ENF test) using different tools, i.e., pocket camera, digital microscope, light microscope, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The results showed, in terms of tensile, the highest strength occurred with 1475.4 MPa. In comparison, the highest flexural strength occurred with 1516.1 MPa, while DCB and ENF showed the highest values with 116.4 and 330 J/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that digital and light microscopes are satisfied to evaluate the specimen in tensile test. However, for the flexural test, ENF, and DCB test, besides the light microscope, further analysis using SEM-EDX is recommended to evaluate the specimen after failure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究成功制造并测试了由碳纤维增强聚合物和冷商用钢板(CFRP-SPCC)组成的新型混合层压板。已经进行了四种不同的测试,即拉伸测试、弯曲测试、双悬臂梁(DCB)或模式i测试,以及端部缺口弯曲(ENF)或模式II测试。测试后,需要对这些样品进行评估。因此,在确定失效试样的失效原因时,不适当的评估步骤可能会产生错误的结论。本研究旨在使用不同的工具,即袖珍相机、数字显微镜、光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM),系统地评估CFRP-SPCC在不同测试(拉伸、弯曲、DCB和ENF测试)中的断裂试样。结果表明,就拉伸而言,最高强度出现在1475.4MPa。相比之下,最高弯曲强度出现在1516.1MPa,而DCB和ENF分别显示出最高值,分别为116.4和330J/m2。结果表明,数字显微镜和光学显微镜能很好地评价试样的拉伸性能。然而,对于弯曲试验、ENF和DCB试验,除了光学显微镜外,建议使用SEM-EDX进行进一步分析,以评估失效后的试样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic analysis of fractured specimens of composite laminates: Different perspectives between tensile, flexural, Mode I, and Mode II test

Novel hybrid laminates consisting of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers and steel plate cold commercial (CFRP-SPCC) have been successfully manufactured and tested in the present study. Four different tests have been made i.e., tensile test, flexural test, double cantilever beam (DCB) or Mode I test, and end notched flexure (ENF) or Mode II test. After being tested, these samples need to be evaluated. Hence, an inappropriate evaluation step while identifying the cause of failure of the failed specimens can create a false conclusion. The present study aims to systematically evaluate the fractured specimens of CFRP-SPCC in different tests (tensile, flexural, DCB, and ENF test) using different tools, i.e., pocket camera, digital microscope, light microscope, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The results showed, in terms of tensile, the highest strength occurred with 1475.4 MPa. In comparison, the highest flexural strength occurred with 1516.1 MPa, while DCB and ENF showed the highest values with 116.4 and 330 J/m2, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that digital and light microscopes are satisfied to evaluate the specimen in tensile test. However, for the flexural test, ENF, and DCB test, besides the light microscope, further analysis using SEM-EDX is recommended to evaluate the specimen after failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信