支撑线的数量和间隔对手写的大小、速度和流畅性的影响。

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Motor Control Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1123/mc.2021-0034

I. H. Duiser, A. Ledebt, J. van der Kamp, G. Savelsbergh

{"title":"支撑线的数量和间隔对手写的大小、速度和流畅性的影响。","authors":"I. H. Duiser, A. Ledebt, J. van der Kamp, G. Savelsbergh","doi":"10.1123/mc.2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined the effects of number of and separation between support lines on handwriting characteristics of primary school students with satisfactory and unsatisfactory handwriting. Students (mean age 7.9 years) copied a text on paper with a baseline and with two or four support lines with a separation of 3 or 4 mm between the central lines. Handwriting size, velocity, and smoothness were determined for the four conditions relative to baseline. Children with unsatisfactory handwriting wrote larger and had more lifts during baseline condition. Writing between support lines, especially with small separation, immediately reduced the size of handwriting, but also adversely affected velocity and smoothness. Future research is needed to assess long-term effects.","PeriodicalId":49795,"journal":{"name":"Motor Control","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Number and Separation of Support Lines on the Size, Velocity, and Smoothness of Handwriting.\",\"authors\":\"I. H. Duiser, A. Ledebt, J. van der Kamp, G. Savelsbergh\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/mc.2021-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examined the effects of number of and separation between support lines on handwriting characteristics of primary school students with satisfactory and unsatisfactory handwriting. Students (mean age 7.9 years) copied a text on paper with a baseline and with two or four support lines with a separation of 3 or 4 mm between the central lines. Handwriting size, velocity, and smoothness were determined for the four conditions relative to baseline. Children with unsatisfactory handwriting wrote larger and had more lifts during baseline condition. Writing between support lines, especially with small separation, immediately reduced the size of handwriting, but also adversely affected velocity and smoothness. Future research is needed to assess long-term effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motor Control\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motor Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2021-0034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2021-0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考察了支持线数和支持线间距对笔迹满意和不满意小学生笔迹特征的影响。学生们(平均年龄7.9岁)在纸上抄写一篇文章，其中有一条基线和两条或四条支撑线，中间线之间间隔3或4毫米。笔迹的大小、速度和平滑度在四种情况下相对于基线进行测定。书写不理想的儿童在基线条件下书写更大，有更多的提升。支撑线之间的书写，尤其是小间距的书写，会立即减小笔迹的大小，同时也会对书写速度和流畅度产生不利影响。需要进一步的研究来评估长期影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Effects of Number and Separation of Support Lines on the Size, Velocity, and Smoothness of Handwriting.

We examined the effects of number of and separation between support lines on handwriting characteristics of primary school students with satisfactory and unsatisfactory handwriting. Students (mean age 7.9 years) copied a text on paper with a baseline and with two or four support lines with a separation of 3 or 4 mm between the central lines. Handwriting size, velocity, and smoothness were determined for the four conditions relative to baseline. Children with unsatisfactory handwriting wrote larger and had more lifts during baseline condition. Writing between support lines, especially with small separation, immediately reduced the size of handwriting, but also adversely affected velocity and smoothness. Future research is needed to assess long-term effects.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Motor Control 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Motor Control (MC), a peer-reviewed journal, provides a multidisciplinary examination of human movement across the lifespan. To keep you abreast of current developments in the field of motor control, it offers timely coverage of important topics, including issues related to motor disorders. This international journal publishes many types of research papers, from clinical experimental to modeling and theoretical studies. These papers come from such varied disciplines as biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. Motor Control, the official journal of the International Society of Motor Control, is designed to provide a multidisciplinary forum for the exchange of scientific information on the control of human movement across the lifespan, including issues related to motor disorders. Motor Control encourages submission of papers from a variety of disciplines including, but not limited to, biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. This peer-reviewed journal publishes a wide variety of types of research papers including clinical experimental, modeling, and theoretical studies. To be considered for publication, papers should clearly demonstrate a contribution to the understanding of control of movement. In addition to publishing research papers, Motor Control publishes review articles, quick communications, commentaries, target articles, and book reviews. When warranted, an entire issue may be devoted to a specific topic within the area of motor control.