《和平的前线:改变世界的内幕指南

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Sven Botha
{"title":"《和平的前线:改变世界的内幕指南","authors":"Sven Botha","doi":"10.1080/10220461.2021.2007165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Séverine Autesserre has persistently made noteworthy and invaluable contributions to the literature on peacebuilding and conflict management, and The Frontlines of Peace is no exception to this trend. Autesserre notes that war has cost the international community $10 trillion annually, which equates to 13% of the world’s gross domestic product and an expenditure of $4 per person per day (p. 17). This mass expenditure, according to Autesserre, is a significant flaw of the peace industry at present. Autesserre argues that ‘[c]contrary to what most politicians preach, building peace doesn’t require billions in aid or massive international interventions’; rather, for Autesserre, ‘[r]eal, lasting pace requires giving power to ordinary citizens’ (pp. 18–19). With this premise in mind, Autesserre proceeds to review the peace industry: what she refers to as ‘Peace, Inc’. Peace, Inc adopts a top-down approach in terms of which peacebuilders and interveners originating from outside a conflict zone arrive in a conflict zone with the view that they know best. This approach is often rooted in stereotypes of the populace residing in the conflict zone in question. In order to prove her point, Autesserre points to her own experiences in the field. She recounts an episode, for example, where a European diplomat likened the violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to that witnessed during the Middle Ages. On a different occasion, a humanitarian worker posited that sexual violence was commonplace within Congolese society due to the existence of an extensive rape culture. Such stereotypes result in the perpetuation of negative perceptions of those residing in conflict zones. In the DRC context, locals gained a reputation associated with the idea that ‘Congo is as Congo does’ (p. 71). Reputations of this kind result in external interveners perceiving populations in conflict zones as weak and incompetent, which in turn leads to the former operating on the assumption that they have a better sense of how to resolve conflict than the latter. Against this backdrop, again drawing from her experiences in the field, Autesserre makes the case that insiders and outsiders need to ensure that they interact outside of the workspace in their efforts to bring about peace, as doing so will help disrupt habitual patterns and defuse tense relationships between different sides. Doing so would help to challenge, and in time reset, the top-down approach practised by Peace, Inc. Towards the end of the volume, Autesserre reflects on her years in the field, offering the reader her version of what she terms the ‘Model Intervener’; for Autesserre, such an individual understands that (p. 153):","PeriodicalId":44641,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","volume":"28 1","pages":"655 - 656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Frontlines of Peace: An Insider’s Guide to Changing the World\",\"authors\":\"Sven Botha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10220461.2021.2007165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Séverine Autesserre has persistently made noteworthy and invaluable contributions to the literature on peacebuilding and conflict management, and The Frontlines of Peace is no exception to this trend. Autesserre notes that war has cost the international community $10 trillion annually, which equates to 13% of the world’s gross domestic product and an expenditure of $4 per person per day (p. 17). This mass expenditure, according to Autesserre, is a significant flaw of the peace industry at present. Autesserre argues that ‘[c]contrary to what most politicians preach, building peace doesn’t require billions in aid or massive international interventions’; rather, for Autesserre, ‘[r]eal, lasting pace requires giving power to ordinary citizens’ (pp. 18–19). With this premise in mind, Autesserre proceeds to review the peace industry: what she refers to as ‘Peace, Inc’. Peace, Inc adopts a top-down approach in terms of which peacebuilders and interveners originating from outside a conflict zone arrive in a conflict zone with the view that they know best. This approach is often rooted in stereotypes of the populace residing in the conflict zone in question. In order to prove her point, Autesserre points to her own experiences in the field. She recounts an episode, for example, where a European diplomat likened the violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to that witnessed during the Middle Ages. On a different occasion, a humanitarian worker posited that sexual violence was commonplace within Congolese society due to the existence of an extensive rape culture. Such stereotypes result in the perpetuation of negative perceptions of those residing in conflict zones. In the DRC context, locals gained a reputation associated with the idea that ‘Congo is as Congo does’ (p. 71). Reputations of this kind result in external interveners perceiving populations in conflict zones as weak and incompetent, which in turn leads to the former operating on the assumption that they have a better sense of how to resolve conflict than the latter. Against this backdrop, again drawing from her experiences in the field, Autesserre makes the case that insiders and outsiders need to ensure that they interact outside of the workspace in their efforts to bring about peace, as doing so will help disrupt habitual patterns and defuse tense relationships between different sides. Doing so would help to challenge, and in time reset, the top-down approach practised by Peace, Inc. Towards the end of the volume, Autesserre reflects on her years in the field, offering the reader her version of what she terms the ‘Model Intervener’; for Autesserre, such an individual understands that (p. 153):\",\"PeriodicalId\":44641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"655 - 656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2021.2007165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2021.2007165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ssamverine Autesserre一直对建设和平和处理冲突的文献作出值得注意和宝贵的贡献,《和平前线》也不例外。Autesserre指出,战争每年给国际社会造成10万亿美元的损失,相当于世界国内生产总值的13%,每人每天的支出为4美元(第17页)。根据Autesserre的说法,这种大规模的支出是目前和平产业的一个重大缺陷。Autesserre认为“[c]与大多数政治家所宣扬的相反,建立和平并不需要数十亿美元的援助或大规模的国际干预”;相反,对Autesserre来说,“真正的、持久的步伐需要把权力交给普通公民”(第18-19页)。考虑到这个前提,Autesserre继续回顾和平产业:她称之为“和平公司”。和平公司采用自上而下的方法,来自冲突地区以外的和平建设者和干预者带着他们最了解的观点来到冲突地区。这种做法往往植根于对有关冲突地区居民的刻板印象。为了证明她的观点,Autesserre提到了她自己在这个领域的经历。例如,她讲述了一个插曲,一位欧洲外交官将刚果民主共和国(DRC)的暴力事件比作中世纪的暴力事件。在另一个场合,一名人道主义工作者认为,由于普遍存在强奸文化,性暴力在刚果社会中是司空见惯的。这种陈规定型观念导致对居住在冲突地区的人的消极看法长期存在。在刚果民主共和国的背景下,当地人获得了一种与“刚果就是刚果”的观念相关的声誉(第71页)。这种声誉导致外部干预者认为冲突地区的人民软弱无能,这反过来又导致前者认为他们比后者更懂得如何解决冲突。在这种背景下,Autesserre再次从她在该领域的经验中得出结论,内部人员和外部人员需要确保他们在工作空间之外的互动,以努力实现和平,因为这样做将有助于打破习惯模式,缓和不同方面之间的紧张关系。这样做将有助于挑战和平公司实行的自上而下的方法,并及时进行重置。在书的最后,Autesserre回顾了她在这个领域的岁月,向读者提供了她所谓的“模范干预者”的版本;对于Autesserre来说,这样的人明白(第153页):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Frontlines of Peace: An Insider’s Guide to Changing the World
Séverine Autesserre has persistently made noteworthy and invaluable contributions to the literature on peacebuilding and conflict management, and The Frontlines of Peace is no exception to this trend. Autesserre notes that war has cost the international community $10 trillion annually, which equates to 13% of the world’s gross domestic product and an expenditure of $4 per person per day (p. 17). This mass expenditure, according to Autesserre, is a significant flaw of the peace industry at present. Autesserre argues that ‘[c]contrary to what most politicians preach, building peace doesn’t require billions in aid or massive international interventions’; rather, for Autesserre, ‘[r]eal, lasting pace requires giving power to ordinary citizens’ (pp. 18–19). With this premise in mind, Autesserre proceeds to review the peace industry: what she refers to as ‘Peace, Inc’. Peace, Inc adopts a top-down approach in terms of which peacebuilders and interveners originating from outside a conflict zone arrive in a conflict zone with the view that they know best. This approach is often rooted in stereotypes of the populace residing in the conflict zone in question. In order to prove her point, Autesserre points to her own experiences in the field. She recounts an episode, for example, where a European diplomat likened the violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to that witnessed during the Middle Ages. On a different occasion, a humanitarian worker posited that sexual violence was commonplace within Congolese society due to the existence of an extensive rape culture. Such stereotypes result in the perpetuation of negative perceptions of those residing in conflict zones. In the DRC context, locals gained a reputation associated with the idea that ‘Congo is as Congo does’ (p. 71). Reputations of this kind result in external interveners perceiving populations in conflict zones as weak and incompetent, which in turn leads to the former operating on the assumption that they have a better sense of how to resolve conflict than the latter. Against this backdrop, again drawing from her experiences in the field, Autesserre makes the case that insiders and outsiders need to ensure that they interact outside of the workspace in their efforts to bring about peace, as doing so will help disrupt habitual patterns and defuse tense relationships between different sides. Doing so would help to challenge, and in time reset, the top-down approach practised by Peace, Inc. Towards the end of the volume, Autesserre reflects on her years in the field, offering the reader her version of what she terms the ‘Model Intervener’; for Autesserre, such an individual understands that (p. 153):
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信