促进包容文化:专业发展对教师辅助技术实践支持早期读写能力的影响

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michelle Schladant, Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg, Christina Nunez, M. Dowling, Rebecca Shearer, Jhonelle Bailey, Austin Garilli, Ruby Natale
{"title":"促进包容文化:专业发展对教师辅助技术实践支持早期读写能力的影响","authors":"Michelle Schladant, Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg, Christina Nunez, M. Dowling, Rebecca Shearer, Jhonelle Bailey, Austin Garilli, Ruby Natale","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2022.2099325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the efficacy of assistive technology (AT), many children with disabilities do not have access to AT and are not fully benefiting from inclusive preschool education. The current mixed-methods study examined a multi-faceted professional development (PD) intervention aligned with the CEC’s Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education (EI/ECSE) Standards to increase general early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ use of AT to promote early literacy in young children with disabilities. The 24-week PD intervention included: (a) online modules, (b) coaching; and (c) a classroom kit of AT devices. Participants were six lead teachers, 10 teacher aides, and 34 children from six inclusive classrooms in two preschools. Quantitative methods included pre-and post- surveys, early literacy assessments, and classroom observations. Qualitative analysis explored data from focus groups and input from teacher adherence forms. Results revealed that (a) teachers’ AT knowledge, positive beliefs, and use; and (b) children’s use of AT and early literacy skills significantly increased pre- to post- intervention. Qualitative findings revealed themes relating to how teachers benefitted from the PD and the impact of AT on teacher instruction and child learning. Findings support innovative PD practices to build capacity of practitioners implementing AT as a responsive instructional strategy in inclusive classrooms.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"147 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting a culture of inclusion: impact of professional development on teachers’ assistive technology practices to support early literacy\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Schladant, Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg, Christina Nunez, M. Dowling, Rebecca Shearer, Jhonelle Bailey, Austin Garilli, Ruby Natale\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10901027.2022.2099325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite the efficacy of assistive technology (AT), many children with disabilities do not have access to AT and are not fully benefiting from inclusive preschool education. The current mixed-methods study examined a multi-faceted professional development (PD) intervention aligned with the CEC’s Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education (EI/ECSE) Standards to increase general early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ use of AT to promote early literacy in young children with disabilities. The 24-week PD intervention included: (a) online modules, (b) coaching; and (c) a classroom kit of AT devices. Participants were six lead teachers, 10 teacher aides, and 34 children from six inclusive classrooms in two preschools. Quantitative methods included pre-and post- surveys, early literacy assessments, and classroom observations. Qualitative analysis explored data from focus groups and input from teacher adherence forms. Results revealed that (a) teachers’ AT knowledge, positive beliefs, and use; and (b) children’s use of AT and early literacy skills significantly increased pre- to post- intervention. Qualitative findings revealed themes relating to how teachers benefitted from the PD and the impact of AT on teacher instruction and child learning. Findings support innovative PD practices to build capacity of practitioners implementing AT as a responsive instructional strategy in inclusive classrooms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2099325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2099325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管辅助技术(AT)很有效,但许多残疾儿童无法获得辅助技术,也没有充分受益于包容性学前教育。当前的混合方法研究考察了多方面的专业发展(PD)干预,与CEC的早期干预/早期儿童特殊教育(EI/ECSE)标准相一致,以增加普通幼儿教育(ECE)教师使用AT来促进残疾幼儿的早期读写能力。为期24周的PD干预包括:(a)在线模块,(b)辅导;(c)一套AT设备的教室套件。参与者包括6名班主任、10名助教和来自两所幼儿园6个包容性教室的34名儿童。定量方法包括前后调查、早期读写能力评估和课堂观察。定性分析探讨了焦点小组的数据和教师依从表格的输入。结果显示:(a)教师的AT知识、积极信念和使用;(b)在干预前和干预后,儿童使用AT和早期读写技能显著提高。定性研究结果揭示了教师如何从PD中受益以及AT对教师教学和儿童学习的影响等主题。研究结果支持创新的PD实践,以建立实践者的能力,将AT作为一种响应性教学策略在包容性课堂中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting a culture of inclusion: impact of professional development on teachers’ assistive technology practices to support early literacy
ABSTRACT Despite the efficacy of assistive technology (AT), many children with disabilities do not have access to AT and are not fully benefiting from inclusive preschool education. The current mixed-methods study examined a multi-faceted professional development (PD) intervention aligned with the CEC’s Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education (EI/ECSE) Standards to increase general early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ use of AT to promote early literacy in young children with disabilities. The 24-week PD intervention included: (a) online modules, (b) coaching; and (c) a classroom kit of AT devices. Participants were six lead teachers, 10 teacher aides, and 34 children from six inclusive classrooms in two preschools. Quantitative methods included pre-and post- surveys, early literacy assessments, and classroom observations. Qualitative analysis explored data from focus groups and input from teacher adherence forms. Results revealed that (a) teachers’ AT knowledge, positive beliefs, and use; and (b) children’s use of AT and early literacy skills significantly increased pre- to post- intervention. Qualitative findings revealed themes relating to how teachers benefitted from the PD and the impact of AT on teacher instruction and child learning. Findings support innovative PD practices to build capacity of practitioners implementing AT as a responsive instructional strategy in inclusive classrooms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education
Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, the official journal of the National Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators, publishes original manuscripts, reviews, and information about association activities. Its purpose is to provide a forum for consideration of issues and for exchange of information and ideas about research and practice in early childhood teacher education. JECTE welcomes research reports, position papers, essays on current issues, reflective reports on innovative teacher education practices, letters to the editor and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信