使用患者体验框架评估患者对急诊科护理服务的满意度

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Yann B. Ferrand, L. Fredendall, J. Siemens, Danny Weathers, R. Pirrallo, M. Bitner
{"title":"使用患者体验框架评估患者对急诊科护理服务的满意度","authors":"Yann B. Ferrand, L. Fredendall, J. Siemens, Danny Weathers, R. Pirrallo, M. Bitner","doi":"10.1080/10686967.2022.2083037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patient satisfaction with their experience during an emergency department (ED) visit is affected both by the quality of the clinical care received and the process of care delivered. This study adapts the generic quality framework developed by Golder, Mitra, and Moorman (2012) (GMM) with a Patient Experience Framework (PEF) tailored to the specific nature of ED care delivery, to systematically review research about ED patient experience. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this review examines a range of medical publications that reported process interventions to improve patient satisfaction, and retained sixty-five studies. This extant research was then analyzed using the GMM framework as a theoretical lens: while every study considered the emergency care delivery process, only two studies investigated the patient experience process, four studies examined how patients evaluate the care received, and only one study considered all three processes. The review identifies areas for future research on patient satisfaction with their ED experience, which needs to expand its reach beyond processes of care delivery. Quality managers should focus on how patients experience the services performed and how that experience, along with prior expectations, affects a priori expectations and subsequent evaluation of the care received.","PeriodicalId":38208,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"160 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing patient satisfaction with emergency department care delivery using a patient experience framework\",\"authors\":\"Yann B. Ferrand, L. Fredendall, J. Siemens, Danny Weathers, R. Pirrallo, M. Bitner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10686967.2022.2083037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Patient satisfaction with their experience during an emergency department (ED) visit is affected both by the quality of the clinical care received and the process of care delivered. This study adapts the generic quality framework developed by Golder, Mitra, and Moorman (2012) (GMM) with a Patient Experience Framework (PEF) tailored to the specific nature of ED care delivery, to systematically review research about ED patient experience. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this review examines a range of medical publications that reported process interventions to improve patient satisfaction, and retained sixty-five studies. This extant research was then analyzed using the GMM framework as a theoretical lens: while every study considered the emergency care delivery process, only two studies investigated the patient experience process, four studies examined how patients evaluate the care received, and only one study considered all three processes. The review identifies areas for future research on patient satisfaction with their ED experience, which needs to expand its reach beyond processes of care delivery. Quality managers should focus on how patients experience the services performed and how that experience, along with prior expectations, affects a priori expectations and subsequent evaluation of the care received.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2022.2083037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2022.2083037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要患者对急诊科就诊体验的满意度受到所接受的临床护理质量和所提供的护理过程的影响。本研究采用了Golder、Mitra和Moorman(2012)(GMM)开发的通用质量框架,并根据ED护理提供的具体性质定制了患者体验框架(PEF),以系统地回顾有关ED患者体验的研究。根据系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南,本综述审查了一系列医学出版物,这些出版物报告了提高患者满意度的过程干预措施,并保留了65项研究。然后,使用GMM框架作为理论视角对这项现存的研究进行了分析:虽然每项研究都考虑了紧急护理的提供过程,但只有两项研究调查了患者的体验过程,四项研究考察了患者如何评估所接受的护理,只有一项研究考虑了这三个过程。该综述确定了未来对患者ED体验满意度的研究领域,需要将其范围扩大到护理提供过程之外。质量管理人员应关注患者如何体验所提供的服务,以及这种体验以及之前的期望如何影响先验期望和对所接受护理的后续评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing patient satisfaction with emergency department care delivery using a patient experience framework
Abstract Patient satisfaction with their experience during an emergency department (ED) visit is affected both by the quality of the clinical care received and the process of care delivered. This study adapts the generic quality framework developed by Golder, Mitra, and Moorman (2012) (GMM) with a Patient Experience Framework (PEF) tailored to the specific nature of ED care delivery, to systematically review research about ED patient experience. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this review examines a range of medical publications that reported process interventions to improve patient satisfaction, and retained sixty-five studies. This extant research was then analyzed using the GMM framework as a theoretical lens: while every study considered the emergency care delivery process, only two studies investigated the patient experience process, four studies examined how patients evaluate the care received, and only one study considered all three processes. The review identifies areas for future research on patient satisfaction with their ED experience, which needs to expand its reach beyond processes of care delivery. Quality managers should focus on how patients experience the services performed and how that experience, along with prior expectations, affects a priori expectations and subsequent evaluation of the care received.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management Journal
Quality Management Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信