Vikas Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, A. Bharti, R. Avinash, K. H. Raghwendra
{"title":"丁丙诺啡和芬太尼减轻喉镜和插管血液动力学变化的疗效比较研究:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。","authors":"Vikas Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, A. Bharti, R. Avinash, K. H. Raghwendra","doi":"10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nHemodynamic changes are the most common predicted response after laryngoscopy and intubation during general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy of buprenorphine with fentanyl to attenuate this stress response.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOne hundred and thirty patients of either sex between the age group of 18-70 years, admitted for the routine surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized, clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (60 patients in each group): group F received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and group B received buprenorphine 2.5 μg/kg; both via intravenous route. Each group received a total volume of 10 mL by adding normal saline to the total drug volume, given over 60 seconds, 5 minutes before intubation. Thereafter patients were induced using routine balanced anesthesia technique, and the hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (0 minute), 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug and again at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. Continuous variables were presented as mean with an 80% confidence interval, and a t-test was applied for comparing the difference of means between two groups after we checked the normality condition. Chi-square test was applied to test the independence of attributes of categorical variables. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the outcome variables between the two groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were statistically insignificant up to 5 minutes after study drug, thereafter mean HR and MAP at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation, were statistically significant between the two groups, and P value was less than 0.05.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe dose of 2.5 μg/kg buprenorphine is an effective alternative to fentanyl 2 μg/kg for attenuating the hemodynamic response accompanying laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without causing any hemodynamic adverse effect.","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"60 1 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Efficacy of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, A. Bharti, R. Avinash, K. H. Raghwendra\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nHemodynamic changes are the most common predicted response after laryngoscopy and intubation during general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy of buprenorphine with fentanyl to attenuate this stress response.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nOne hundred and thirty patients of either sex between the age group of 18-70 years, admitted for the routine surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized, clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (60 patients in each group): group F received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and group B received buprenorphine 2.5 μg/kg; both via intravenous route. Each group received a total volume of 10 mL by adding normal saline to the total drug volume, given over 60 seconds, 5 minutes before intubation. Thereafter patients were induced using routine balanced anesthesia technique, and the hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (0 minute), 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug and again at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. Continuous variables were presented as mean with an 80% confidence interval, and a t-test was applied for comparing the difference of means between two groups after we checked the normality condition. Chi-square test was applied to test the independence of attributes of categorical variables. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the outcome variables between the two groups.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIn both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were statistically insignificant up to 5 minutes after study drug, thereafter mean HR and MAP at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation, were statistically significant between the two groups, and P value was less than 0.05.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe dose of 2.5 μg/kg buprenorphine is an effective alternative to fentanyl 2 μg/kg for attenuating the hemodynamic response accompanying laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without causing any hemodynamic adverse effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"60 1 1\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study of Efficacy of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.
BACKGROUND
Hemodynamic changes are the most common predicted response after laryngoscopy and intubation during general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy of buprenorphine with fentanyl to attenuate this stress response.
METHODS
One hundred and thirty patients of either sex between the age group of 18-70 years, admitted for the routine surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized, clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (60 patients in each group): group F received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and group B received buprenorphine 2.5 μg/kg; both via intravenous route. Each group received a total volume of 10 mL by adding normal saline to the total drug volume, given over 60 seconds, 5 minutes before intubation. Thereafter patients were induced using routine balanced anesthesia technique, and the hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (0 minute), 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug and again at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. Continuous variables were presented as mean with an 80% confidence interval, and a t-test was applied for comparing the difference of means between two groups after we checked the normality condition. Chi-square test was applied to test the independence of attributes of categorical variables. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the outcome variables between the two groups.
RESULTS
In both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were statistically insignificant up to 5 minutes after study drug, thereafter mean HR and MAP at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation, were statistically significant between the two groups, and P value was less than 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS
The dose of 2.5 μg/kg buprenorphine is an effective alternative to fentanyl 2 μg/kg for attenuating the hemodynamic response accompanying laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without causing any hemodynamic adverse effect.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.